Tennessee Constitutional Amendment 1, Right-to-Work Amendment (2022)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Tennessee Constitutional Amendment 1
Flag of Tennessee.png
Election date
November 8, 2022
Topic
Labor and unions
Status
Approveda Approved
Type
Constitutional amendment
Origin
State legislature

Tennessee Constitutional Amendment 1, the Right-to-Work Amendment, was on the ballot in Tennessee as a legislatively referred constitutional amendment on November 8, 2022.[1] The measure was approved.

A "yes" vote supported amending the state constitution to add a new section to make it illegal for workplaces to require mandatory labor union membership for employees as a condition for employment.

A "no" vote opposed this amendment, while maintaining a similar law in state statutes.


Election results

Tennessee Amendment 1

Result Votes Percentage

Approved Yes

1,141,941 69.79%
No 494,239 30.21%
Results are officially certified.
Source

Overview

What did the amendment do?

See also: Text of measure

Constitutional Amendment 1 added a new section to the Tennessee Constitution to make it illegal for workplaces to require mandatory labor union membership for employees as a condition for employment. This type of policy is known as right-to-work. Tennessee enacted a right-to-work law in 1947.[2]

As of January 2021, 27 states had right-to-work laws in place. The majority of right-to-work laws were passed by states between 1944 and 1958, although some were passed after 2010. Of the 27 states, 18 had right-to-work laws, and nine states had right-to-work constitutional amendments.[3]

Did other states vote on right-to-work laws?

See also: History of right-to-work ballot measures

At the time of the election, Ballotpedia had tracked 28 right-to-work ballot measures appearing on statewide ballots between 1944 and 2018. Of the 28 measures, 18 were constitutional amendments, seven were statutes, and three were referendums on statutes passed by the legislature. Out of the 18 constitutional amendments, eight were approved, and 10 were defeated. Two statutes were approved, and five were defeated. Two of the referendums were approved upholding the right-to-work law, and one was defeated repealing the law.

At the time of the election, the last vote on a right-to-work law was in 2018 in Missouri. Voters defeated Proposition A, which repealed a right-to-work law passed by the state legislature. The law was repealed with 67.47% of voters rejecting the law and 32.53% of voters deciding to uphold the law.

Who supported and opposed the amendment?

See also: Support and Opposition

The amendment was sponsored by Senator Brian Kelsey (R). He said, "The Tennessee right-to-work law states that workers cannot be hired or fired, or in any way discriminated against based on whether or not they are a member of a union. I think that this right is an important enough civil right that it belongs in our state constitution."[4]

It was passed during the 2020 and 2021 legislative sessions largely along party lines, with Republican Senator Todd Gardenhire and Representative Scotty Campbell joining Democrats in the minority.

Senator Sara Kyle (D), who opposed the measure, said, "Right-to-work is a false slogan. The true effect of this legislation is to destroy the freedom and power of collective bargaining. Collective bargaining has lifted millions of workers out of poverty and provided families with health care and dignity in retirement. That gives big corporations the upper hand."[4]

Text of measure

Ballot title

The official ballot title was as follows:[5]

Shall Article XI of the Constitution of Tennessee be amended by adding the following language as a new section?


It is unlawful for any person, corporation, association, or this state or its political subdivisions to deny or attempt to deny employment to any person by reason of the person’s membership in, affiliation with, resignation from, or refusal to join or affiliate with any labor union or employee organization.[6]

Ballot summary

The official ballot summary was as follows:[5]

This amendment would add a new section to article XI of the Tennessee Constitution to make it illegal for any person, corporation, association, or the State of Tennessee or its political subdivisions to deny or attempt to deny employment to any person because of the person’s membership in, affiliation with, resignation from, or refusal to join or affiliate with any labor union or employee organization.[6]

Constitutional changes

See also: Article XI, Tennessee Constitution

The measure added a new section to Article XI of the state constitution. The following underlined text was added:[2]

It is unlawful for any person, corporation, association, or this state or its political subdivisions to deny or attempt to deny employment to any person by reason of the person's membership in, affiliation with, resignation from, or refusal to join or affiliate with any labor union or employee organization.[6]

Full text

The full text can be found here.

Readability score

See also: Ballot measure readability scores, 2022

Using the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL) and Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) formulas, Ballotpedia scored the readability of the ballot title and summary for this measure. Readability scores are designed to indicate the reading difficulty of text. The Flesch-Kincaid formulas account for the number of words, syllables, and sentences in a text; they do not account for the difficulty of the ideas in the text. The state legislature wrote the ballot language for this measure.

The FKGL for the ballot title is grade level 20, and the FRE is 9. The word count for the ballot title is 68.

The FKGL for the ballot summary is grade level 33, and the FRE is -23. The word count for the ballot summary is 65.


Support

VoteYeson1.png

Yes on 1 Committee led the campaign in support of the amendment. Governor Bill Lee (R) was the chair of the committee.[7]

Supporters

Officials

Former Officials

Organizations

  • Americans for Tax Reform
  • Beacon Impact
  • National Federation of Independent Business - Tennessee
  • Tennessee Chamber of Commerce
  • The Beacon Center of Tennessee

Arguments

  • State Sen. Paul Bailey (R): "Tennessee workers want to make their own choices in the workplace, and this amendment will forever seal that right. It also sends a strong message that Tennessee will continue to foster a business-friendly climate into the future for locating high quality jobs. There is no better place than our state constitution to ensure that Tennessee remains a right-to-work state."
  • Justin Owen, president of Beacon Impact and executive committee member of Yes on 1: "We think ‘Right to Work’ is one of the reasons our economy has been strong, as a state, up there with lacking a state income tax, it’s one of the biggest things that employers look at when relocating when investing and expanding"
  • Justin Owen, president of Beacon Impact and executive committee member of Yes on 1: "There are a lot of misconceptions that ‘Right to Work’ means you can be fired for any reason, that’s a completely separate law that’s called employment-at-will. Right to Work is really simple, all it says is that if you want to join a union and pay dues, you should be allowed to do so and can’t be fired for doing so. If you don’t want to join a union and pay dues you shouldn’t be prohibited from doing so."
  • State Rep. John Holsclaw (R): Holsclaw, the chairman of the Tennessee Employee Affairs subcommittee, said, "Adding this language to our state constitution sends a message very loud and clear that Tennesseans want to make their own choices in the workplace."
  • State Sen. Brian Kelsey (R): "The Tennessee right-to-work law states that workers cannot be hired or fired, or in any way discriminated against based on whether or not they are a member of a union. I think that this right is an important enough civil right that it belongs in our state constitution."


Opposition

Noon1.png

Vote No on 1 was the committee registered in opposition to Amendment 1.[8]

Opponents

Officials

Candidates

Unions

  • Tennessee AFL-CIO

Individuals

Arguments

  • State Sen. Sara Kyle (D): "Right-to-work is a false slogan. The true effect of this legislation is to destroy the freedom and power of collective bargaining. Collective bargaining has lifted millions of workers out of poverty and provided families with health care and dignity in retirement. That gives big corporations the upper hand."
  • Lendon Grisham, president of Teamsters Local 480: "The union must represent a nonmember, and the nonmember enjoys the same negotiated wages, protections and benefits. Right to work is wrong and it has no place in our constitution."
  • Kermit Moore, president of A Philip Randolph Institute; Anne Langendorfer, president of United Campus Workers; and Tobey Patton, a business representative at Teamsters Local 480: "Federal law forces unions to represent everyone. It’s a legal fact. Senator Kelsey's constitutional change, which would permanently lock this unfair law into our state, runs counter to basic principles of fairness to which unite us all, conservative and progressive. 'Right to work' is a flawed statute that should not be turned into a flawed amendment to our constitution."
  • Billy Dycus, president of Tennessee AFL-CIO: "With the Tennessee House of Representative’s final approval of SJR 0002, the Republican supermajority sent a clear message: our state is pro-business and anti-worker. In spite of repeated, powerful testimony against this harmful resolution over the past several months and hundreds of phone calls and e-mails, legislators once again chose to ignore the voices of working families and side with corporate special interests."
  • State Rep. John Ray Clemmons (D): "It’s really interesting to me that they’re pushing this constitutional amendment — you know this has been a law for 75 years under Republican and Democratic control legislators and repealing it has never been on the table. [...] We should reserve amending our state’s constitution for very important things that need to be addressed I think this whole initiative is nothing but political points scoring with some big corporate donors and corporate interest in, really we’re wasting time in failing to address the needs and focus on working families."


Campaign finance

See also: Campaign finance requirements for Tennessee ballot measures
The campaign finance information on this page reflects the most recent scheduled reports that Ballotpedia has processed, which covered through December 31, 2022.


There was one committee, Yes on 1, registered to support the amendment. They reported $243,245 in contributions. Vote No on 1 and Workplace Democracy and Justice were the committees registered in opposition to this amendment. They reported $43,233 in contributions.

   .sbtotaltable {
   width: 50%;
   }
   .sbtotaltable th {
    font-size:1.2em;
   }
   .sbtotaltable td {
       text-align:center;
      }
   .sbtotalheader {
       background-color: black !important;
       color:white !important;
       font-size:1.0em;
       font-weight:bold;
   }
   .sbtotaltotal {
       font-weight:bold;
   }
   

    
Cash Contributions In-Kind Contributions Total Contributions Cash Expenditures Total Expenditures
Support $242,975.00 $270.00 $243,245.00 $240,407.01 $240,677.01
Oppose $25,400.00 $17,833.82 $43,233.82 $34.65 $17,868.47
Total $268,375.00 $18,103.82 $286,478.82 $240,441.66 $258,545.48

Support

The following table includes contribution and expenditure totals for the committee in support of the ballot measure.[9]

   .sbtotaltable {
   width: 50%;
   }
   .sbtotaltable th {
    font-size:1.2em;
   }
   .sbtotaltable td {
       text-align:center;
      }
   .sbtotalheader {
       background-color: black !important;
       color:white !important;
       font-size:1.0em;
       font-weight:bold;
   }
   .sbtotaltotal {
       font-weight:bold;
   }
   

    
Committees in support of Amendment 1
Committee Cash Contributions In-Kind Contributions Total Contributions Cash Expenditures Total Expenditures
Yes on 1 $242,975.00 $270.00 $243,245.00 $240,407.01 $240,677.01
Total $242,975.00 $270.00 $243,245.00 $240,407.01 $240,677.01

Donors

The following table shows the top donors to the committee registered in support of the ballot measure.[9]

Donor Cash Contributions In-Kind Contributions Total Contributions
Bill Lee for Tennessee $25,000.00 $0.00 $25,000.00
William Haslam $25,000.00 $0.00 $25,000.00
Brian Hunt $16,500.00 $0.00 $16,500.00
Tennessee Chamber of Commerce $12,500.00 $0.00 $12,500.00

Opposition

The following table includes contribution and expenditure totals for the committees in opposition to the initiative.[9]

   .sbtotaltable {
   width: 50%;
   }
   .sbtotaltable th {
    font-size:1.2em;
   }
   .sbtotaltable td {
       text-align:center;
      }
   .sbtotalheader {
       background-color: black !important;
       color:white !important;
       font-size:1.0em;
       font-weight:bold;
   }
   .sbtotaltotal {
       font-weight:bold;
   }
   

    
Committees in opposition to Amendment 1
Committee Cash Contributions In-Kind Contributions Total Contributions Cash Expenditures Total Expenditures
Vote No on 1 $25,300.00 $17,833.82 $43,133.82 $11.85 $17,845.67
Workplace Democracy and Justice $100.00 $0.00 $100.00 $22.80 $22.80
Total $25,400.00 $17,833.82 $43,233.82 $34.65 $17,868.47

Donors

The following were the top donors to the committee.[9]

Donor Cash Contributions In-Kind Contributions Total Contributions
Tennessee State Council SEIU $25,000.00 $0.00 $25,000.00

Methodology

To read Ballotpedia's methodology for covering ballot measure campaign finance information, click here.

Background

Right-to-work in Tennessee

See also: Right-to-work laws

Right-to-work laws are pieces of legislation that guarantee that no employee can be required to join, or not join, a union, or be required to pay dues to a labor union as a condition of employment. Right-to-work laws also prohibit labor unions and employers from entering into contracts that only employ unionized workers for the jobs under the contract.[10]

In 1947, the Tennessee State Legislature passed a right-to-work law along with six other states. At the time, Tennessee had a Democratic state government trifecta. A trifecta exists when one political party simultaneously holds the governor’s office and majorities in both state legislative chambers.[10]

The 2022 amendment was referred to the ballot by a Republican-controlled legislature. The votes in the two separate legislative sessions were largely along party lines with two Republican legislators joining the minority, Senator Todd Gardenhire and Rep. Scotty Campbell. Tennessee had a Republican trifecta beginning in 2011.[1]

Right-to-work laws across the country

As of January 2021, 27 states had right-to-work laws in place. The majority of right-to-work laws were passed by states between 1944 and 1958, although some were passed after 2010. Of the 27 states, 18 had right-to-work laws, and nine states had right-to-work constitutional amendments.[3]

History of right-to-work ballot measures

The following table features right-to-work ballot measures that appeared on statewide ballots between 1944 and 2018. Of the 28 measures, 12 were approved, and 16 were defeated.

History of right-to-work on the ballot
State Year Measure Type Result
Arkansas 1944 Amendment 35 Constitutional Approveda
California 1944 Proposition 12 Constitutional Defeatedd
Florida 1944 Amendment 5 Constitutional Defeatedd
Arizona 1946 Proposition 4 Constitutional Approveda
Nebraska 1946 Amendment 1 Constitutional Approveda
South Dakota 1946 Proposed Amendment Constitutional Approveda
Arizona 1948 Proposition 4 Statute (Referendum) Approveda (Upheld)
Maine 1948 Barlow/Tabb Statutes Statute Defeatedd
Massachusetts 1948 Question 5 Statute Defeatedd
New Mexico 1948 Amendment 3 Constitutional Defeatedd
North Dakota 1948 Referendum 2 Statute Approveda
Nevada 1952 Question 1 Statute Approveda
Washington 1956 Initiative 198 Statute Defeatedd
California 1958 Proposition 18 Constitutional Defeatedd
Colorado 1958 Measure 5 Constitutional Defeatedd
Idaho 1958 Initiative 1 Statute Defeatedd
Kansas 1958 Amendment 3 Constitutional Approveda
Ohio 1958 Amendment 2 Constitutional Defeatedd
Washington 1958 Initiative 202 Statute Defeatedd
Mississippi 1960 Proposed Amendment Constitutional Approveda
Oklahoma 1964 State Question 409 Constitutional Defeatedd
Missouri 1978 Amendment 23 Constitutional Defeatedd
Idaho 1986 Referendum 1 Statute (Referendum) Approveda (Upheld)
Oklahoma 2001 State Question 695 Constitutional Approveda
Colorado 2008 Initiative 47 Constitutional Defeatedd
Alabama 2016 Amendment 8 Constitutional Approveda
Virginia 2016 Question 1 Constitutional Defeatedd
Missouri 2018 Proposition A Statute (Referendum) Defeatedd (Repealed)

Arguments for and against right-to-work

Both supporters and opponents of right-to-work laws make philosophical, economic, and political arguments. The following table contains a selection of arguments from both sides:

Debate surrounding right-to-work (RTW) laws
Argument Support Opposition
Philosophical NRWF: RTW is about individual freedom. Workers should be allowed to decide whether to provide a labor union with financial support and represent themselves as individuals in relationships with their employers.[11]

Seventh-Day Adventist Church: Workers should not be required to contribution to labor unions that utilize methods that compromise the individual’s conscience. Workers lose free will in the workplace due to forced payments to unions.[12]

John Stowe, Roman Catholic Bishop of the Diocese of Lexington, KY: RTW violates the principle of the common good. Workers should be required to contribute dues to labor unions that negotiate for the common good of a workplace’s employees.[13]

Utility Workers Union of America: RTW creates a free-rider problem. Some workers discontinue paying their fair share, while everyone, including non-paying workers, reaps the benefits, creating division among workers.[14]

Economic The Heritage Foundation: RTW laws make labor unions less aggressive, encouraging domestic and foreign business investment.[15]
U.S. Chamber of Commerce: RTW helps increase the production output of businesses, which translates to higher incomes for workers.[16]
Economic Policy Institute: RTW lowers wages and benefits for workers and reduces consumer demand, weaking the middle class.[17]

SEIU Local 521: RTW tilts the balance of power toward bosses in the workplace, making workplaces less safe for workers.[18]

Political National Right to Work Legal Defense: Unions are responsible for the tax-and-spend policies of the federal government. Unions collect billions each year from dues. Workers should get to decide whether to contribute to unions.[19] CAP: RTW weakens workers' voices in the federal and state governments and decreases voter turnout.[20]

AFL-CIO: RTW tilts the balance of power toward big corporations in politics. Unions provide a counterforce to corporations in politics.[21]

Taft-Hartley Act

See also: Taft-Hartley Act

Congress passed the Taft-Hartley Act in 1947, which allowed individual states to enact right-to-work laws. Between 1935 and 1947, the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA), also known as the Wagner Act, permitted collective bargaining agreements in all states between employers and unions that required all employees at a workplace to pay dues to the union. These agreements were known as union security agreements. As of 2018, the NLRA continues to permit union security agreements, although the Taft-Hartley Act allows states to forbid union security agreements via right-to-work laws. President Harry S. Truman (D) vetoed the Taft-Hartley Act, but the House of Representatives and Senate overrode his veto.[22]

In NLRB v. General Motors Corporation of 1967, the Supreme Court ruled that an employee cannot be required to join a labor union by a union security agreement, but can be required to pay dues to the union representing the employee's workplace for collective bargaining costs.[23]

Referred amendments on the ballot in Tennessee

Between 1995 and 2020, the following occurred in Tennessee:

  • There were 11 constitutional amendments on the ballot.
  • The average number of amendments on general election ballots was about one.
  • Voters approved 100% of the constitutional amendments appearing on ballots during that period.
  • Voters last decided on constitutional amendments in 2014, passing all four amendments.
Ballot measures in Tennessee, 1995-2020
Type Total number Approved Percent approved Defeated Percent defeated Average Median Minimum Maximum
Constitutional amendments 11 11 100.0% 0 0.0% 0.9 0.0 0 4

Path to the ballot

See also: Amending the Tennessee Constitution

In Tennessee, a legislatively referred constitutional amendment requires a vote in each chamber of the Tennessee State Legislature in two successive legislative sessions with an election in between. However, there are two different vote requirements depending on the session. During the first legislative session, the constitutional amendment needs to receive a simple majority (50%+1) vote in each legislative chamber. During the second legislative session, the constitutional amendment needs to receive a two-thirds vote in each legislative chamber.

This amendment was introduced as Senate Joint Resolution 648 on January 8, 2020. On February 10, 2020, the state Senate passed SJR 648 in a vote of 24-5. Of the 25 Republicans in the Senate, 24 voted in favor of SJR 648, and Sen. Todd Gardenhire was the sole Republican to vote against it. All four Democrats voted against it. On June 17, 2020, the state House passed SJR 648 in a vote of 68-22. The vote was along party lines with Republicans in the majority and Democrats in the minority.[1]

111th General Assembly:

Vote in the Tennessee State Senate
February 10, 2020
Requirement: Approval in two legislative sessions is required; a simple majority vote of all members in each chamber in the first and a two-thirds (66.67 percent) vote of all members in each chamber in the second
Number of yes votes required: 17  Approveda
YesNoNot voting
Total2450
Total percent82.76%17.24%0%
Democrat040
Republican2410

Vote in the Tennessee House of Representatives
June 17, 2020
Requirement: Approval in two legislative sessions is required; a simple majority vote of all members in each chamber in the first and a two-thirds (66.67 percent) vote of all members in each chamber in the second
Number of yes votes required: 50  Approveda
YesNoNot voting
Total68220
Total percent75.56%24.44%0%
Democrat0220
Republican6800

112th General Assembly:

The amendment was introduced as Senate Joint Resolution 2 (SJR 2) on January 12, 2021. The state Senate passed the amendment on March 8, 2021, by a vote of 24-7. The vote was along party lines with one Republican, Sen. Todd Gardenhire, joining the minority. On April 29, 2021, the state House passed the amendment in a vote of 67-24 with one present and not voting. The vote was also along party lines with Rep. Scotty Campbell (R) joining the Democratic minority.[24]

Vote in the Tennessee State Senate
March 8, 2021
Requirement: Approval in two legislative sessions is required; a simple majority vote of all members in each chamber in the first and a two-thirds (66.67 percent) vote of all members in each chamber in the second
Number of yes votes required: 22  Approveda
YesNoNot voting
Total2470
Total percent77.42%22.58%0.00%
Democrat060
Republican2410

Vote in the Tennessee House of Representatives
April 29, 2021
Requirement: Approval in two legislative sessions is required; a simple majority vote of all members in each chamber in the first and a two-thirds (66.67 percent) vote of all members in each chamber in the second
Number of yes votes required: 66  Approveda
YesNoNot voting
Total67241
Total percent72.83%26.09%1.09%
Democrat0230
Republican6711

How to cast a vote

See also: Voting in Tennessee

Click "Show" to learn more about voter registration, identification requirements, and poll times in Tennessee.

See also

External links

Support

Opposition

Submit links to [email protected].

Footnotes

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 Tennessee State Legislature, "SJR 648 Overview," accessed June 18, 2020
  2. 2.0 2.1 Tennessee State Legislature, "SJR 648 Full Text," accessed June 18, 2020
  3. 3.0 3.1 National Right to Work Committee, "State Right to Work Timeline," accessed November 10, 2015
  4. 4.0 4.1 The Neighbor, "Right to work constitutional amendment advances in Senate," accessed June 21, 2021
  5. 5.0 5.1 Tennessee Secretary of State, "2022 Proposed Constitutional Amendments," accessed July 22, 2022
  6. 6.0 6.1 6.2 6.3 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "quotedisclaimer" defined multiple times with different content Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "quotedisclaimer" defined multiple times with different content
  7. The Leaf Chronicle, "Gov. Bill Lee to chair committee aiming to place right-to-work law in Tennessee Constitution," November 22, 2021
  8. No on 1, "Homepage," accessed Oct 27, 2022
  9. 9.0 9.1 9.2 9.3 Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named finance
  10. 10.0 10.1 Workplace Fairness, "Right to Work Laws," accessed December 30, 2015
  11. National Right to Work Foundation, "What Does Right to Work Mean?" accessed July 10, 2018
  12. Seventh-Day Adventist Church, "What is the Adventist Church's stance on trade unions?" June 13, 2016
  13. The Catholic Labor Network, "Kentucky Bishop on Right to Work: 'This cannot be seen as contributing to the common good'," January 26, 2017
  14. Utility Workers Union of America, "Right to Work," July 12, 2018
  15. The Heritage Foundation, "Right to Work Increases Jobs and Choices," November 9, 2011
  16. U.S. Chamber of Commerce, "Right-to-Work Laws: The Economic Evidence," May 11, 2018
  17. Economic Policy Institute, "Right-to-work is wrong for Missouri," July 10, 2018
  18. SEIU Local 521, "Together We Rise: Our Campaign to Fight the “Right-to-Work” (For Less)," accessed July 12, 2018
  19. National Right to Work Legal Defense, "Right to Work Frequently-Asked Questions," accessed July 12, 2018
  20. Center for American Progress Action Fund, "Right-to-Work 101," February 2, 2012
  21. AFL-CIO, "Right to Work," accessed July 12, 2018
  22. Congressional Research Service, Right to Work Laws: Legislative Background and Empirical Research," January 6, 2014
  23. Cornell University Law School, "NLRB v. General Motors Corporation," accessed April 25, 2017
  24. Tennessee State Legislature, "Senate Joint Resolution 2," accessed February 11, 2021
  25. LexisNexis, "Tenn. Code Ann. § 2-3-201", accessed August 15, 2024
  26. LexisNexis, "Tenn. Code Ann. § 2-7-127," accessed August 15, 2024
  27. Tennessee Secretary of State, "Everything You Need to Know to #GoVoteTN Tuesday," accessed August 15, 2024
  28. 28.0 28.1 28.2 Tennessee Secretary of State, "Register to Vote," accessed May 3, 2023
  29. 29.0 29.1 NCSL, "State Profiles: Elections," accessed August 13, 2024
  30. Tennessee Secretary of State, "Tennessee Mail-In Application For Voter Registration," accessed November 15, 2024
  31. LexisNexis, “Tenn. Code Ann. § 2-2-141,” accessed November 14, 2024
  32. Under federal law, the national mail voter registration application (a version of which is in use in all states with voter registration systems) requires applicants to indicate that they are U.S. citizens in order to complete an application to vote in state or federal elections, but does not require voters to provide documentary proof of citizenship. According to the U.S. Department of Justice, the application "may require only the minimum amount of information necessary to prevent duplicate voter registrations and permit State officials both to determine the eligibility of the applicant to vote and to administer the voting process."
  33. 33.0 33.1 Tennesse Secretary of State, "What ID is required when voting?" accessed May 3, 2023 Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "tvid" defined multiple times with different content