Tennessee Constitutional Amendment 4, Remove Religious Minister Disqualification Amendment (2022)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Tennessee Constitutional Amendment 4
Flag of Tennessee.png
Election date
November 8, 2022
Topic
State legislatures measures and Religion
Status
Approveda Approved
Type
Constitutional amendment
Origin
State legislature

Tennessee Constitutional Amendment 4, the Remove Religious Minister Disqualification Amendment, appeared on the ballot in Tennessee as a legislatively referred constitutional amendment on November 8, 2022.[1] The measure was approved.

A "yes" vote supported repealing Section 1 of Article IX of the Tennessee Constitution, which stated that religious ministers were disqualified from being elected to the state General Assembly.

A "no" vote opposed repealing Section 1 of Article IX of the Tennessee Constitution.


Election results

Tennessee Amendment 4

Result Votes Percentage

Approved Yes

1,020,981 63.24%
No 593,461 36.76%
Results are officially certified.
Source

Overview

What did Amendment 4 change?

See also: Text of the measure

Amendment 4 repealed Section 1 of Article IX of the Tennessee Constitution, which said that religious ministers were disqualified from being elected to the state General Assembly. In 1978, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that forbidding religious ministers from holding public office was unconstitutional. Due to McDaniel v. Paty, the constitutional language was not enforced.

Why were clergy banned from serving in public office?

See also: Clergy serving in office

The practice of prohibiting clergy from serving in public office came from English law to prevent “dual office-holding,” as well as preventing a diminishment of the independence of the House of Commons by the Crown, since ministers in England were subject to the powers of the Crown.[2]

The practice carried over to the United States as 13 states initially established this ban in their constitutions. There was some disagreement among the founding fathers regarding this ban on clergy serving in public office. While some, like Thomas Jefferson, wanted to clearly establish the separation between church and state, others, like James Madison, believed that it violated a “fundamental principle of liberty by punishing a religious profession with the privation of a civil right.”[2]

Did other states ban clergy from serving in public office?

See also: States previously forbidding clergy from serving in public office

According to the McDaniel v. Paty syllabus, 13 states initially banned clergy from serving in public office in the drafting of their constitutions. Only Tennessee and Maryland kept this provision in their constitutions going into the 20th century. In 1978, Maryland put a constitutional amendment on the ballot to remove this provision from their constitution, and voters approved it.[3]

In the McDaniel v. Paty case, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that it is unconstitutional to ban clergy from serving in public office because it violates both the First and Fourteenth amendments. While the law was declared unconstitutional, the provision remained in the Tennessee Constitution.[3]

How did this measure get on the ballot?

See also: Path to the ballot

To get a legislatively referred constitutional amendment on the ballot, the amendment must pass both houses of the state legislature in two consecutive sessions.

In its first legislative session, the amendment was introduced as Senate Joint Resolution 178 (SJR 178) by Senator Mark Pody (R-17) on February 7, 2019. The measure passed the Senate on May 2, 2019, with 100% of the votes (31-0). The measure then passed the House with 100% of the votes (85-0) on June 17, 2020.

In the following legislative session (2021-2022), the amendment was introduced as Senate Joint Resolution 55 (SJR 55). On April 8, 2022, the Senate unanimously voted to adopt the amendment with 32 yes votes. On April 24, 2022, the House voted to concur with the Senate, with 89 yes votes and 1 no vote.

Text of the measure

Ballot title

The official ballot title was as follows:[4]

Shall Article IX, Section 1 of the Constitution of Tennessee be amended by deleting the section?[5]

Ballot summary

The official ballot summary was as follows:[4]

This amendment would delete article IX, section 1 of the Tennessee Constitution, which prohibits ministers of the gospel and priests of any denomination from holding a seat in either House of the legislature.[5]

Constitutional changes

See also: Article IX, Tennessee Constitution

Constitutional Amendment 4 would repeal Section 1 of Article IX of the Tennessee Constitution. The following struck-through text would be deleted:[6]

Whereas ministers of the Gospel are by their profession, dedicated to God and the care of souls, and ought not to be diverted from the great duties of their functions; therefore, no minister of the Gospel, or priest of any denomination whatever, shall be eligible to a seat in either House of the Legislature.[5]

Readability score

See also: Ballot measure readability scores, 2022

Using the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL) and Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) formulas, Ballotpedia scored the readability of the ballot title and summary for this measure. Readability scores are designed to indicate the reading difficulty of text. The Flesch-Kincaid formulas account for the number of words, syllables, and sentences in a text; they do not account for the difficulty of the ideas in the text. The state legislature wrote the ballot language for this measure.

The FKGL for the ballot title is grade level 12, and the FRE is 34. The word count for the ballot title is 15.

The FKGL for the ballot summary is grade level 18, and the FRE is 21. The word count for the ballot summary is 32.


Support

Supporters

Officials

Arguments

  • State Rep. Harold Love (D-58): “These are what we might call opportunities to clean up what was already done but not done fully. In the legislature, we’ll have what we call clean up bills … In the Tennessee Constitution, surely, this is something that is no longer applicable but will be an opportunity for the voters to remove the language from it.”
  • State Rep. Johnny Shaw (D-80): "I think that clergy are the proper people to serve constituents across the state of Tennessee because I think we will certainly stick as close to what’s right, fair, and equal in all situations."


Oppose

Ballotpedia did not locate a campaign in opposition to the ballot measure.

Background

Clergy serving in office

This section contains information from the McDaniel v. Paty syllabus. According to the syllabus, the disqualification of members of the clergy from serving in public office initially carried over from English law. There were varying reasons for forbidding clergy from serving in public office. In England, it was to prevent dual office-holding in both the Parliament and Convocation, and to "insure that the priest or deacon devoted himself to his sacred calling" rather than to "such mundane activities as were appropriate to a member of the House of Commons.” Preventing clergy from serving in public office could have also been a means to prevent ministers from using membership in the House of Commons to diminish the government’s independence, since ministers were subject to the powers of the Crown.[2]

In the United States, seven original states and six of the new states carried this English practice over into their own laws. States may have prevented clergy from serving to establish the separation of church and state.[2]

Thomas Jefferson, when drafting a 1783 version of the Virginia Constitution, advocated for preventing clergy from serving in public office, taking the stance of the philosopher John Locke, who argued for confining the power of clergy "within the bounds of the church, nor can it in any manner be extended to civil affairs; because the church itself is a thing absolutely separate and distinct from the commonwealth." James Madison disagreed with this view, saying "does not the exclusion of Ministers of the Gospel as such violate a fundamental principle of liberty by punishing a religious profession with the privation of a civil right?”[2]

States previously forbidding clergy from serving in public office

Thirteen states, including Tennessee, had provisions in their constitution forbidding clergy from serving in the state legislature. Seven of the original states carried over this practice from English law while six additional states created similar laws. Eleven states–Delaware, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, Missouri, New York, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Virginia–amended their constitutions and dropped these provisions during the late 1700’s and 1800’s. Maryland and Tennessee kept these provisions in their constitutions into the 20th century. In 1978, the U.S. Supreme Court found that the Tennessee law was unconstitutional in its McDaniel v. Paty ruling because it violated the First Amendment. That same year, Maryland put a constitutional amendment on the ballot to remove the provision from their constitution, and voters approved the removal. Tennessee was the only state left with this kind of provision in its constitution.[3]

McDaniel v. Paty

When Tennessee first established its constitution in 1796, it included a statute that prohibited clergy from serving as legislators. In 1977, Paul A. McDaniel, a Baptist minister, filed as a candidate to run for office. An opposing candidate, Selma Cash Paty, sued in the Chancery Court for a declaratory judgment that McDaniel was disqualified. The Chancellor Franks of the Chancery Court ruled that the statute prohibiting clergy from serving as legislators was unconstitutional and violated the First and Fourteenth Amendments. After the election, the Tennessee Supreme Court reversed the decision by the Chancery Court and held that the disqualification of clergy from serving in public office imposed no burden on religious belief and restricted "religious action … [only] in the lawmaking process of government—where religious action is absolutely prohibited by the establishment clause.” The court held that the justification of separating church and state was sufficient to justify the disqualification.[2][7] The U.S. Supreme Court later struck down this decision, ruling that prohibiting ministers from serving in public office is unconstitutional because it violates both the First and Fourteenth Amendments.

Path to the ballot

See also: Amending the Tennessee Constitution

In Tennessee, a legislatively referred constitutional amendment requires a vote in each chamber of the Tennessee State Legislature in two successive legislative sessions with an election in between. However, there are two different vote requirements depending on the session. During the first legislative session, the constitutional amendment needs to receive a simple majority (50%+1) vote in each legislative chamber. During the second legislative session, the constitutional amendment needs to receive a two-thirds vote in each legislative chamber.

2019-2020

This amendment was introduced as Senate Joint Resolution 178 on February 7, 2019. On May 2, 2019, the state Senate passed SJR 178 in a vote of 31-0. On June 17, 2020, the state House passed SJR 178 in a vote of 85-0.[1]

Vote in the Tennessee State Senate
May 2, 2019
Requirement: Approval in two legislative sessions is required; a simple majority vote of all members in each chamber in the first and a two-thirds (66.67 percent) vote of all members in each chamber in the second
Number of yes votes required: 16  Approveda
YesNoNot voting
Total3100
Total percent100%0%0%
Democrat400
Republican2700

Vote in the Tennessee House of Representatives
June 17, 2020
Requirement: Approval in two legislative sessions is required; a simple majority vote of all members in each chamber in the first and a two-thirds (66.67 percent) vote of all members in each chamber in the second
Number of yes votes required: 46  Approveda
YesNoNot voting
Total8500
Total percent100%0%0%
Democrat2000
Republican6500

2021-2022

The amendment was introduced in its second legislative session as Senate Joint Resolution 55. On April 8, 2021, the state Senate approved SJR 55 by a vote of 32-0.[8] On April 8, 2022, the Senate unanimously voted to adopt the amendment with 32 yes votes.[9] And on April 24, 2022, the House voted to concur with the Senate, with 89 yes votes and 1 no vote.[10]

Vote in the Tennessee State Senate
April 8, 2021
Requirement: Approval in two legislative sessions is required; a simple majority vote of all members in each chamber in the first and a two-thirds (66.67 percent) vote of all members in each chamber in the second
Number of yes votes required: 22  Approveda
YesNoNot voting
Total3201
Total percent96.97%0.00%3.03%
Democrat501
Republican2700

Vote in the Tennessee House of Representatives
April 27, 2022
Requirement: Approval in two legislative sessions is required; a simple majority vote of all members in each chamber in the first and a two-thirds (66.67 percent) vote of all members in each chamber in the second
Number of yes votes required: 66  Approveda
YesNoNot voting
Total8918
Total percent90%1%8%
Democrat2311
Republican6607

See also

How to cast a vote

See also: Voting in Tennessee

Click "Show" to learn more about current voter registration rules, identification requirements, and poll times in Tennessee.

External links

Footnotes

  1. 1.0 1.1 Tennessee State Legislature, "SJR 178 Overview," accessed June 18, 2020
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 Legal Information Institute, "Paul A. McDANIEL, Appellant, v. Selma Cash PATY et al.," accessed August 23, 2022
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 Middle State Tennessee University, "Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom," accessed August 23, 2022
  4. 4.0 4.1 Tennessee Secretary of State, "2022 Proposed Constitutional Amendments," accessed July 22, 2022
  5. 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "quotedisclaimer" defined multiple times with different content Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "quotedisclaimer" defined multiple times with different content
  6. Tennessee State Legislature, "SJR 178 Full Text," accessed June 18, 2020
  7. Oyez, "McDaniel v. Paty," accessed August 23, 2022
  8. Tennessee General Assembly, "Senate Joint Resolution 55," accessed April 18, 2022
  9. Legiscan, "Tennessee Senate Joint Resolution 55 Roll Call vote," accessed May 3, 2022
  10. Legiscan, "Tennessee Senate Joint Resolution 55 Roll Call vote," accessed May 3, 2022
  11. LexisNexis, "Tenn. Code Ann. § 2-3-201", accessed August 15, 2024
  12. LexisNexis, "Tenn. Code Ann. § 2-7-127," accessed August 15, 2024
  13. Tennessee Secretary of State, "Everything You Need to Know to #GoVoteTN Tuesday," accessed August 15, 2024
  14. 14.0 14.1 14.2 Tennessee Secretary of State, "Register to Vote," accessed May 3, 2023
  15. 15.0 15.1 NCSL, "State Profiles: Elections," accessed August 13, 2024
  16. Tennessee Secretary of State, "Tennessee Mail-In Application For Voter Registration," accessed November 15, 2024
  17. LexisNexis, “Tenn. Code Ann. § 2-2-141,” accessed November 14, 2024
  18. Under federal law, the national mail voter registration application (a version of which is in use in all states with voter registration systems) requires applicants to indicate that they are U.S. citizens in order to complete an application to vote in state or federal elections, but does not require voters to provide documentary proof of citizenship. According to the U.S. Department of Justice, the application "may require only the minimum amount of information necessary to prevent duplicate voter registrations and permit State officials both to determine the eligibility of the applicant to vote and to administer the voting process."
  19. 19.0 19.1 Tennesse Secretary of State, "What ID is required when voting?" accessed May 3, 2023 Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "tvid" defined multiple times with different content