Nevada Question 1, Equality of Rights Amendment (2022)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Nevada Question 1, Equality of Rights Amendment
Flag of Nevada.png
Election date
November 8, 2022
Topic
Constitutional rights
Status
Approveda Approved
Type
Constitutional amendment
Origin
State legislature

Nevada Question 1, the Equality of Rights Amendment, was on the ballot in Nevada as a legislatively referred constitutional amendment on November 8, 2022.[1] The measure was approved.

A "yes" vote supported adding language to the Nevada Constitution that prohibits the denial or abridgment of rights on account of an individual's race, color, creed, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, age, disability, ancestry or national origin.

A "no" vote opposed this amendment to the Nevada Constitution that prohibits the denial or abridgment of rights on account of an individual's race, color, creed, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, age, disability, ancestry or national origin.


Election results

Nevada Question 1

Result Votes Percentage

Approved Yes

580,022 58.63%
No 409,228 41.37%
Results are officially certified.
Source

Overview

How did Question 1 change the constitution?

See also: Text of measure

The amendment added a new section to the end of Article 1 of the Nevada Constitution that states: "Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by this State or any of its political subdivisions on account of race, color, creed, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, age, disability, ancestry or national origin."[1]

Do other state constitutions have similar provisions?

See also: Equal rights provisions in state constitutions and Federal Equal Rights Amendment

As of 2022, 25 state constitutions had provisions that guaranteed equal rights either in their original text or added later as an amendment. The last state to adopt an equal rights provision was Delaware in January 2021.[2][3]

As of 2022, there was also an effort to adopt a federal Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) into the U.S. Constitution. For the ERA to become a part of the U.S. Constitution, the amendment needed to pass both chambers of Congress by a two-thirds vote and then receive ratification by three-fourths of the states. The ERA passed the U.S. House of Representatives on October 12, 1971, and it passed the U.S. Senate on March 22, 1972. Congress set a ratification deadline of March 22, 1979, for state legislatures to consider the amendment. In 1978, Congress passed a joint resolution extending the deadline to June 30, 1982. By 1982, 35 of the necessary 38 states had ratified the amendment. On March 21, 2017, Nevada was the first state to ratify the ERA after the deadline.[4]

What did supporters and opponents say about Question 1?

See also: Support and Opposition

State Senator Patricia Spearman (D), a sponsor of the amendment, said, "We've waited long enough for equal rights to be incorporated into our state constitution … We must be brave in protecting the weak, the downtrodden, the oppressed. We must be brave in lifting our fellow Nevadans to a place of justice and equality."[5]

Alliance Defending Freedom, a nonprofit that litigates cases related to religion and family issues, said, "S.J.R. 8 would open the door to government-mandated discrimination, inequality, and coercion. As discussed below, it would hurt women, religious organizations and schools, medical professionals, and could even mandate that taxpayers pay for others to receive abortions."[6]

Text of measure

Ballot title

The official ballot title was as follows:[1]

Question 1: Senate Joint Resolution No. of the 80th Session:

Shall the Nevada Constitution be amended by adding a specific guarantee that equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by this State or any of its cities, counties, or other political subdivisions on account of race, color, creed, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, age, disability, ancestry, or national origin? [7]

Ballot summary

The official ballot summary was as follows:[1]

This ballot measure would add new language to the Nevada Constitution specifically guaranteeing that equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the State or any of its cities, counties, or other political subdivisions based on race, color, creed, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, age, disability, ancestry, or national origin.

A “Yes” vote would amend the Nevada Constitution to add new language specifically guaranteeing that equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the State or any of its cities, counties, or other political subdivisions based on race, color, creed, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, age, disability, ancestry, or national origin.

A “No” vote would not amend the Nevada Constitution to add new language specifically guaranteeing that equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the State or any of its cities, counties, or other political subdivisions based on race, color, creed, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, age, disability, ancestry or national origin. [7]

Constitutional changes

See also: Article 1, Nevada Constitution

The measure added a new section to Article 1 of the Nevada Constitution. The following underlined text was added:[1]

Sec. 24. Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by this State or any of its political subdivisions on account of race, color, creed, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, age, disability, ancestry or national origin.[7]

Full text

The full text is available here.

Readability score

See also: Ballot measure readability scores, 2022

Using the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL) and Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) formulas, Ballotpedia scored the readability of the ballot title and summary for this measure. Readability scores are designed to indicate the reading difficulty of text. The Flesch-Kincaid formulas account for the number of words, syllables, and sentences in a text; they do not account for the difficulty of the ideas in the text. The state legislature wrote the ballot language for this measure.

The FKGL for the ballot title is grade level 29, and the FRE is -12. The word count for the ballot title is 56.

The FKGL for the ballot summary is grade level 30, and the FRE is -16. The word count for the ballot summary is 174.


Support

Supporters

Officials

Organizations

  • Battle Born Progress
  • Human Rights Campaign PAC
  • Progressive Leadership Alliance of Nevada
  • Sierra Club Tioyabe Chapter

Arguments

  • State Sen. Pat Spearman (D): "We've waited long enough for equal rights to be incorporated into our state constitution … We must be brave in protecting the weak, the downtrodden, the oppressed. We must be brave in lifting our fellow Nevadans to a place of justice and equality."
  • State Sen. Scott Hammond (R): "I can find no part of it that is anything but equality under the law. This is a question of justice, period."
  • Senate Majority Leader Nicole Cannizzaro (D): "The time is NOW to show the nation that we, as Nevadans, lead when it comes to equality for all. At every decision point in history, the quest for equality has met with stiff and obstinate opposition. Equal justice has NEVER been given. We must persist in this effort to achieve equal rights. There are nearly 30 states that have passed or are considering state equal rights amendments to their constitutions. Most provide for the equality of rights to not be abridged or denied because of sex. The measure before you today clarifies that the equality of rights should not only be based upon the sex of an individual, but on the wholistic aspects of all persons, which includes the mind, body, and spirit."

Official arguments

The following was the argument in support of Question 1 found in the Statewide Ballot Questions 2022 Pamphlet Guide:[8]

  • Statewide Ballot Questions 2022: Equality is a cornerstone of our democracy, but not everyone enjoys full equality. Historically, certain groups have been discriminated against because of their characteristics. One of the most effective ways to help ensure equality is to specifically include protections from discrimination in the Nevada Constitution, making them far more difficult to repeal, undermine, or overturn based on the political mood of the day. Approving Question 1 will establish an enduring commitment to equality for everyone. Although some protection against discrimination exists in federal and state law, there are gaps in the existing legal patchwork that have resulted in unavailable or inadequate protection for certain classes of people, including instances of unequal pay for women and pregnancy discrimination. This ballot measure fills those gaps by providing comprehensive state constitutional guarantees of equal treatment under the law for the classifications of race, color, creed, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, age, disability, ancestry, and national origin. Contrary to opponents’ arguments, religion is one of the classifications protected by this ballot measure because courts interpret “creed” to have the same meaning as “religion.” Therefore, by prohibiting discrimination based on a person’s “creed,” this ballot measure adds an additional layer of constitutional protection for our religious liberties. Approving Question 1 will also improve outcomes for people in the protected classifications who have been discriminated against in Nevada by allowing our courts to apply a heightened level of scrutiny to laws or actions of the State or local governments that violate any of the protected classifications. This ballot measure will provide clear guidance to courts and lawmakers on Nevada’s commitment to protect against discrimination and advance equality based on the unique text and history of Nevada’s equal rights amendment. Do not be misled by opponents’ arguments about Question 1. Their arguments consist of unfounded speculation intended to distract from the clear goal of this ballot measure, which is to ensure equality. They argue that this ballot measure may be used to protect abortion rights, undermine women’s sports by allowing male and transgender athletes to compete unfairly against women and girls in school sports, and challenge the traditional separation of men’s and women’s restrooms and locker rooms in government-owned facilities. First, Nevada law already guarantees the right to an abortion, and this ballot measure will not change that right. Second, this ballot measure will not remove the State’s ability to ensure competitive balance in school sports. Finally, it will not prevent the traditional separation of men’s and women’s restrooms and locker rooms in government-owned facilities, such as public schools, universities, and colleges. This ballot measure will not diminish the rights of some people at the expense of others but, instead, will advance equality for all by filling the gaps in existing protections. Additionally, this ballot measure will not eliminate the authority of the State and local governments to protect classifications of people, including children and other vulnerable populations, who have always been entitled to such protections. Governmental entities will still be able to pass laws or take actions to protect classifications of people but will have to honor Nevada’s constitutional commitment to equality when doing so. Everyone deserves to be treated equally under the law. Vote “Yes” on Question 1.

Opposition

If you are aware of any opponents or opposing arguments, please send an email with a link to [email protected].

Opponents

Organizations

  • Alliance Defending Freedom
  • Nevada Families for Freedom
  • Pro-Life League of Nevada

Arguments

  • Janine Hansen, state president of Nevada Families for Freedom: "[The amendment] will result result {{sic}} in inequality and confusion and will eliminate protections and benefits women currently enjoy."
  • Don Nelson, Pro-Life League of Nevada: "Courts in New Mexico and Connecticut have used state Equal Rights Amendments laws similar to the language in [this amendment] to overturn state laws prohibiting taxpayer funding of abortion on the grounds that to not fund abortion is sex discrimination. The rationale is that since abortion is a medical procedure sought only by women, laws treating abortion differently from other medical procedures is a form of sex discrimination. The same rationale will be used to expand and protect abortion in Nevada."
  • Alliance Defending Freedom: "S.J.R. 8 would open the door to government-mandated discrimination, inequality, and coercion. As discussed below, it would hurt women, religious organizations and schools, medical professionals, and could even mandate that taxpayers pay for others to receive abortions. ... By enshrining 'gender identity' in the state constitution, it would mandate that men who self-identify as women be allowed to compete for spots on female sports teams, women’s scholarships, and other academic and sports-related opportunities specifically for women. ... S.J.R. 8 would deny state financial aid to students at faith-based colleges and universities unless they abandon policies and practices reflecting their sincerely held beliefs about marriage and sexuality."

Official arguments

The following was the argument opposing Question 1 found in the Statewide Ballot Questions 2022 Pamphlet Guide:[9]

  • Statewide Ballot Questions 2022: Proponents fail to acknowledge the impact Question 1 may have on individual liberties and safety. They state that this ballot measure will protect against religious discrimination based on a person’s “creed” or religion. But they fail to explain how this ballot measure can give new constitutional protections to classifications such as sex, sexual orientation, and gender identity or expression and, at the same time, actually protect the religious liberties of individuals who hold traditional views on marriage and gender and want to live according to those values. Question 1 may also be used by proponents to support access to abortion. Already, the highest courts in some states have interpreted their constitutional equal rights provisions to mandate taxpayer funding of medically necessary abortions through Medicaid. If Question 1 is approved, proponents may use this ballot measure as a basis to demand taxpayer funding of abortions in Nevada. And if the U.S. Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade, proponents may use this ballot measure as a basis to claim abortion rights in Nevada despite the Supreme Court’s decision. Further, Question 1 may be used by biological males and transgender athletes as a basis to undermine women’s sports by demanding equal rights that allow them to compete unfairly against women and girls in school sports and for athletic scholarships. Question 1 may also be used to challenge the traditional separation of men’s and women’s restrooms and locker rooms in government-owned facilities, such as public schools, universities, and colleges, potentially allowing biological men and women in each other’s restrooms and locker rooms and threatening everyone’s personal safety and privacy. In 1978, Nevadans overwhelmingly voted against the proposed Equal Rights Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which was limited to protecting against discrimination on account of sex. If passed, Question 1 would dramatically expand the equal rights protected specifically in the Nevada Constitution beyond sex to include a total of ten classifications. However, this ballot measure contains no provisions to guide courts in resolving conflicts among the protections provided to all of these classifications. For instance, there is no way to know how courts would resolve challenges to existing age-based laws regarding sexual consent, child endangerment, and parental consent and notification, some of which involve classifications based on both age and sex. No other state has implemented such a broad and legally untested constitutional provision protecting equal rights, and Nevada should not be the first state to do so. Enshrining such broad and untested equal rights language into the Nevada Constitution will make it difficult to fix its inevitable unintended consequences. Approval of Question 1 will result in a flood of litigation, clogging our court system because of its vague and expansive language. Further, because Question 1 cements this language into the Nevada Constitution, it will require another lengthy constitutional amendment process to undo its negative effects. This ballot measure is harmful and misguided. Vote “No” on Question 1.

Campaign finance

See also: Campaign finance requirements for Nevada ballot measures

If you are aware of a committee that was registered to support or oppose this amendment, please email [email protected].

   .sbtotaltable {
   width: 50%;
   }
   .sbtotaltable th {
    font-size:1.2em;
   }
   .sbtotaltable td {
       text-align:center;
      }
   .sbtotalheader {
       background-color: black !important;
       color:white !important;
       font-size:1.0em;
       font-weight:bold;
   }
   .sbtotaltotal {
       font-weight:bold;
   }
   

    
Cash Contributions In-Kind Contributions Total Contributions Cash Expenditures Total Expenditures
Support $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Oppose $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Media editorials

See also: 2022 ballot measure media endorsements

Support

The following media editorial boards published an editorial supporting the ballot measure:

  • Las Vegas Sun Editorial Board: "Currently, a patchwork of local, state and federal laws provides inconsistent protection against identity-based discrimination in Nevada. The result is that everyone from individuals to government and school officials to law enforcement are often unsure of when and how to take action against discriminatory practices. By passing this long-overdue amendment to the state constitution and enshrining these protections in the most powerful legal document in the state, Nevadans can expect consistent, reliable and predictable protection against discriminatory practices by their government."


Opposition

The following media editorial boards published an editorial opposing the ballot measure:

  • Las Vegas Review-Journal Editorial Board: "Question 1 bills itself as the Equal Rights Amendment. It would prohibit state and local governments from denying or abridging rights based on a host of factors. The list includes race, color, creed, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, age, disability, ancestry or national origin. That may sound benign, but it will result in unintended consequences involving conflicts between various “protected” classes. Enactment of this vaguely worded amendment would send the state into uncharted legal territory. A minimum drinking or driving age is discriminatory? In addition, some of this is duplicative and already codified in federal law. Broad initiatives such as this typically become the playground of lawyers hoping to win from the judiciary what the people’s elected representatives are unwilling to grant."


Polls

See also: Nevada ballot measure polls
Are you aware of a poll on this ballot measure that should be included below? You can share ballot measure polls, along with source links, with us at [email protected].
Nevada Equal Rights Amendment (2022)
Poll
Dates
Sample size
Margin of error
Support
Oppose
Undecided
NV Indy Fest 7/20/22-7/29/22 741 LV ± 3.6% 62% 23% 15%
Question: "Amending the Nevada Constitution to add the following section: "Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by this State or any of its political subdivisions on account of race, color, creed, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, age, disability, ancestry or national origin.""
Suffolk University 8/14/22-8/17/22 500 LV ± 4.4% 69.4% 20% 9%
Question: "A ballot initiative would add the Equal Rights Amendment to Nevada’s State Constitution. It would change the Nevada Constitution to “guarantee that equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by this State or any of its cities, counties, or other political subdivisions on account of race, color, creed, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, age, disability, ancestry, or national origin.” At this point, do you strongly support, somewhat support, somewhat oppose, or strongly oppose this ballot initiative?"
OH Predictive Insights for The Nevada Independent 7/8/22-7/19/22 924 RV ± 3.22% 72% 13% 15%
Question: "A question on the ballot asks if the Nevada Constitution should be amended to add this section: "Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by this State or any of its political subdivisions on account of race, color, creed, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, age, disability, ancestry, or national origin." Do you support this or oppose this?"
Note: LV is likely voters, RV is registered voters, and EV is eligible voters.

Background

Equality of rights in the Nevada Constitution

Article I of the Nevada Constitution is known as the Declaration of Rights. As of 2021, the declaration's first section stated that: "All men are by Nature free and equal and have certain inalienable rights among which are those of enjoying and defending life and liberty; Acquiring, Possessing and Protecting property and pursuing and obtaining safety and happiness."

Equal rights provisions in state constitutions

As of September 2021, 25 state constitutions had provisions that guaranteed equal rights either in their original text or added later as an amendment. The formulation of the provisions varies state by state. The last state to adopt an equal rights provision was Delaware in January 2021. The map below highlights which states have equal rights provisions in their state constitutions.[2][3]

Federal Equal Rights Amendment

The first federal Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) was introduced in Congress in 1923. The text of the amendment stated:[10]

Section 1. Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.

Sec. 2. The Congress shall have the power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.

Sec. 3. This amendment shall take effect two years after the date of ratification.[7]

For the ERA to become a part of the U.S. Constitution, the amendment needed to pass both chambers of Congress by a two-thirds vote and then receive ratification by three-fourths of the states. The ERA passed the U.S. House of Representatives on October 12, 1971, and it passed the U.S. Senate on March 22, 1972. Congress set a ratification deadline of March 22, 1979, for state legislatures to consider the amendment. In 1978, Congress passed a joint resolution extending the deadline to June 30, 1982. By 1982, 35 of the necessary 38 states had ratified the amendment.[4]

On March 21, 2017, Nevada was the first state to ratify the ERA after the deadline. The amendment passed the Nevada State Assembly by a vote of 28-14. It passed the Nevada State Senate by a vote of 13-8.

Illinois and Virginia ratified the amendment in 2018 and 2020, respectively.

The map below shows the status of the federal ERA by state:[4]

Constitutional amendments in Nevada

In Nevada, the state legislature can propose amendments to the state constitution, and citizens can propose initiated constitutional amendments. Between 1995 and 2020, 62 constitutional amendments appeared on statewide ballots. Of that total, 38 were approved, and 24 were defeated. The following chart illustrates trends in constitutional amendments on the ballot in Nevada:

Constitutional amendments on the ballot in Nevada, 1995-2020
Total number Approved Percent approved Defeated Percent defeated Even-year average Even-year median Even-year minimum Even-year maximum
62 38 61.3% 24 38.7% 4.75 3.50 1 12

Path to the ballot

See also: Amending the Nevada Constitution

In Nevada, a majority vote is required in two successive sessions of the Nevada State Legislature to place an amendment on the ballot.

On June 1, 2019, the state Senate passed the amendment in a vote of 18-3. On June 3, 2019, the state Assembly passed the amendment in a vote of 33-8.[11]

2019 legislative session

Vote in the Nevada State Senate
June 1, 2019
Requirement: SImple majority vote of all members in each chamber in two sessions
Number of yes votes required: 11  Approveda
YesNoNot voting
Total1830
Total percent85.71%14.28%0.00%
Democrat1210
Republican620

Vote in the Nevada State Assembly
June 3, 2019
Requirement: SImple majority vote of all members in each chamber in two sessions
Number of yes votes required: 21  Approveda
YesNoNot voting
Total3380
Total percent80.48%19.51%0.00%
Democrat2800
Republican580

2021 legislative session

Both chambers of the state legislature needed to pass SJR 8 during the 2021 legislative session to refer the amendment to the ballot for the election on November 8, 2022.

On March 23, 2021, the Nevada State Senate approved SJR 8, with 18 senators supporting and three opposing the amendment. On March 24, the Nevada State Assembly approved SJR 8, with 30 members supporting and 12 opposing the amendment.[11]

As SJR 8 passed both chambers of the legislature in 2019 and 2021, it was referred to the ballot for the election on November 8, 2022.

Vote in the Nevada State Senate
March 23, 2021
Requirement: SImple majority vote of all members in each chamber in two sessions
Number of yes votes required: 11  Approveda
YesNoNot voting
Total1830
Total percent85.7%14.3%0%
Democrat1200
Republican630

Vote in the Nevada State Assembly
March 24, 2021
Requirement: SImple majority vote of all members in each chamber in two sessions
Number of yes votes required: 22  Approveda
YesNoNot voting
Total30120
Total percent71.4%28.6%0.0%
Democrat2600
Republican4120

How to cast a vote

See also: Voting in Nevada

Click "Show" to learn more about voter registration, identification requirements, and poll times in Nevada.

See also

External links

Footnotes

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 Nevada State Legislature, "SJR 8" accessed June 4 2019
  2. 2.0 2.1 WMDT, "House gives final passage to Equal Rights Amendment in Del.," January 28, 2021
  3. 3.0 3.1 Congressional Research Service, "Equal Rights Amendments: State Provisions," August 23, 2004
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 Equal Rights Amendment, "History," accessed August 16, 2021
  5. The Nevada Independent, "Lawmakers push to add equal rights language to Nevada Constitution following long national ERA effort," accessed August 18, 2021
  6. Nevada State Legislature, "ADF Testimony," accessed August 18, 2021
  7. 7.0 7.1 7.2 7.3 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "quotedisclaimer" defined multiple times with different content Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "quotedisclaimer" defined multiple times with different content
  8. Nevada Secretary of State, "Statewide Ballot Questions 2022," accessed October 27, 2022
  9. Nevada Secretary of State, "Statewide Ballot Questions 2022," accessed October 27, 2022
  10. Govinfo.gov, "Text of federal ERA amendment," accessed August 16, 2021
  11. 11.0 11.1 Nevada State Legislature, "SJR 8," accessed March 25, 2021
  12. Nevada Revised Statutes, "Title 24, Chapter 293, Section 273," accessed April 17, 2023
  13. ACLU of Nevada, "Know Your Voting Rights - Voting in Nevada," accessed April 17, 2023
  14. 14.0 14.1 14.2 14.3 Nevada Secretary of State, “Elections,” accessed October 3, 2024
  15. Nevada Secretary of State, “Registering to Vote,” accessed April 17, 2023
  16. Nevada Department of Motor Vehicles, “Voter Registration,” accessed April 17, 2023
  17. The Nevada Independent, “The Indy Explains: How does Nevada verify a voter's eligibility?” April 23, 2017
  18. Under federal law, the national mail voter registration application (a version of which is in use in all states with voter registration systems) requires applicants to indicate that they are U.S. citizens in order to complete an application to vote in state or federal elections, but does not require voters to provide documentary proof of citizenship. According to the U.S. Department of Justice, the application "may require only the minimum amount of information necessary to prevent duplicate voter registrations and permit State officials both to determine the eligibility of the applicant to vote and to administer the voting process."
  19. Nevada Revised Statutes, "NRS 293.277 Conditions for entitlement of person to vote; forms of identification to identify registered voter." accessed April 17, 2023