Maryland Question 4, Marijuana Legalization Amendment (2022)
Maryland Question 4 | |
---|---|
Election date November 8, 2022 | |
Topic Marijuana | |
Status Approved | |
Type Constitutional amendment | Origin State legislature |
Maryland Question 4, the Marijuana Legalization Amendment, was on the ballot in Maryland as a legislatively referred constitutional amendment on November 8, 2022.[1][2] The ballot measure was approved.
A "yes" vote supported legalizing marijuana for adults 21 years of age or older beginning in July 2023 and directing the Maryland State Legislature to pass laws for the use, distribution, regulation, and taxation of marijuana. |
A "no" vote opposed legalizing marijuana for adults 21 years of age or older beginning in July 2023 and directing the Maryland State Legislature to pass laws for the use, distribution, regulation, and taxation of marijuana. |
Election results
Maryland Question 4 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Result | Votes | Percentage | ||
1,302,161 | 67.20% | |||
No | 635,572 | 32.80% |
Aftermath
House Bill 556 (2023)
During the 2023 legislative session, the Maryland State Legislature passed House Bill 556, the implementing legislation for the amendment. It passed the state Senate with amendments by a vote of 30-12 on April 7, 2023. The state House concurred by a vote of 104-35 on April 8, 2023. HB 556 allows companies that are already licensed to sell medical marijuana to pay a one-time conversion fee based on 2022 sales to gain authorization to sell recreational marijuana. HB 556 set the sales tax on recreational marijuana at 9%. It was signed by Gov. Wes Moore (D) on May 3, 2023.[3]
Overview
What did Question 4 do?
- See also: Text of measure
Question 4 amended the Maryland Constitution to add a new article, Article XX, which authorized individuals 21 years of age or older to use and possess marijuana. The added section also authorized the Maryland General Assembly to "provide for the use, distribution, possession, regulation, and taxation of cannabis within the state." During the 2022 legislative session, the state legislature also passed the implementing legislation that took effect once the amendment is adopted.[2]
At the time of the election, marijuana was legal for medicinal use in Maryland under a 2013 law. In April 2014, possession of 10 grams or less of marijuana was decriminalized.[4][5]
How did Question 4 get on the ballot?
- See also: Path to the ballot
Question 4 was introduced as House Bill 1 (HB 1) on January 12, 2022, by Delegate Luke Clippinger (D). It was approved in the state House in a vote of 96-34 on February 25, 2022. All but one Republican voted against the measure. On April 1, 2022, the state Senate voted to pass the measure with amendments by a vote of 29-17. Two Democrats, Sens. Joanne Benson and Jill Carter, voted with the Republican minority against the bill. On the same day, the state House voted to concur with the amendment by a vote of 94-39. Two Democrats, Delegates Debra Davis and Geraldine Valentino-Smith, joined the Republican minority in voting against the bill. One Republican, Delegate Carl Anderton Jr., voted in favor of the bill.[1]
This was the second time a state legislature referred a constitutional amendment proposing marijuana legalization to voters. In 2020, the New Jersey State Legislature voted to refer an amendment to voters, who approved the measure.
What is the status of recreational marijuana in the United States?
- See also: Background
Going into the election, 19 states and Washington, D.C., had legalized the possession and personal use of marijuana for recreational purposes.[6][7][8]
- In 11 states and D.C., the ballot initiative process was used to legalize marijuana.
- In one state, the legislature referred a measure to the ballot for voter approval.
- In seven states, bills to legalize marijuana were enacted into law.
Marijuana legalization measures were on the 2022 ballot in Arkansas, Maryland, Missouri, North Dakota, and South Dakota. The measures were approved in Maryland and Missouri and were defeated in Arkansas, North Dakota, and South Dakota.
Text of measure
Ballot title
The ballot title was as follows:[2]
“ | Do you favor the legalization of the use of cannabis by an individual who is at least 21 years of age on or after July 1, 2023, in the State of Maryland?
[ ] For the constitutional amendment [ ] Against the constitutional amendment[9] |
” |
Constitutional changes
- See also: Maryland Constitution
Question 4 added a new article, Article XX, to the Maryland Constitution. The following underlined text was added:[2]
Article XX – Cannabis 1. (A) Subject to Subsection (B) of this section, on or after July 1, 2023, an individual in the state who is at least 21 years old may use and possess cannabis. (B) The General Assembly shall, by law, provide for the use, distribution, possession, regulation, and taxation of cannabis within the state.[9] |
Readability score
- See also: Ballot measure readability scores, 2022
Using the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL) and Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) formulas, Ballotpedia scored the readability of the ballot title for this measure. Readability scores are designed to indicate the reading difficulty of text. The Flesch-Kincaid formulas account for the number of words, syllables, and sentences in a text; they do not account for the difficulty of the ideas in the text. The state legislature wrote the ballot language for this measure.
The FKGL for the ballot title is grade level 14, and the FRE is 49. The word count for the ballot title is 29.
Support
Yes on 4 led the campaign in support of Question 4.[10]
Supporters
Officials
- State Sen. William Ferguson IV (D)
- State Delegate Luke Clippinger (D)
- State Delegate Adrienne Jones (D)
Organizations
Arguments
Opposition
Protect Maryland Kids led the campaign in opposition to Question 4.[11]
Opponents
Organizations
Arguments
Campaign finance
Ballotpedia identified two committees in support of Question 4: MD Can '22, Inc. and Legalize Maryland 2022. MD Can '22, Inc. reported $428,848.87 in contributions, and Legalize Maryland 2022 had not reported any contributions. One committee—Protect Maryland's Kids—registered in opposition to Question 4. It reported $5,500 in in-kind contributions.[12]
.sbtotaltable { width: 50%; } .sbtotaltable th { font-size:1.2em; } .sbtotaltable td { text-align:center; } .sbtotalheader { background-color: black !important; color:white !important; font-size:1.0em; font-weight:bold; } .sbtotaltotal { font-weight:bold; }
Cash Contributions | In-Kind Contributions | Total Contributions | Cash Expenditures | Total Expenditures | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Support | $372,437.06 | $56,411.81 | $428,848.87 | $368,452.28 | $424,864.09 |
Oppose | $0.00 | $5,500.00 | $5,500.00 | $0.00 | $5,500.00 |
Support
The following table includes contribution and expenditure totals for the committees in support of the measure.[12]
.sbtotaltable { width: 50%; } .sbtotaltable th { font-size:1.2em; } .sbtotaltable td { text-align:center; } .sbtotalheader { background-color: black !important; color:white !important; font-size:1.0em; font-weight:bold; } .sbtotaltotal { font-weight:bold; }
Committees in support of Question 4 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Committee | Cash Contributions | In-Kind Contributions | Total Contributions | Cash Expenditures | Total Expenditures |
MD Can '22, Inc. | $372,437.06 | $56,411.81 | $428,848.87 | $368,452.28 | $424,864.09 |
Legalize Maryland 2022 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
Total | $372,437.06 | $56,411.81 | $428,848.87 | $368,452.28 | $424,864.09 |
Donors
The following were the top donors who contributed to the support committees.[12]
Donor | Cash Contributions | In-Kind Contributions | Total Contributions |
---|---|---|---|
Scotts Miracle-Gro Company | $100,000.00 | $0.00 | $100,000.00 |
Curio Wellness | $67,382.06 | $15,800.00 | $83,182.06 |
Trulieve Medical Cannabis Dispensary | $50,000.00 | $1,361.81 | $51,361.81 |
SunMed Growers | $50,000.00 | $0.00 | $50,000.00 |
Green Thumb Industries | $25,000.00 | $0.00 | $25,000.00 |
Opposition
The following table includes contribution and expenditure totals for the committee in opposition to the measure.[12]
.sbtotaltable { width: 50%; } .sbtotaltable th { font-size:1.2em; } .sbtotaltable td { text-align:center; } .sbtotalheader { background-color: black !important; color:white !important; font-size:1.0em; font-weight:bold; } .sbtotaltotal { font-weight:bold; }
Committees in support of Question 4 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Committee | Cash Contributions | In-Kind Contributions | Total Contributions | Cash Expenditures | Total Expenditures |
Protect Maryland's Kids | $0.00 | $5,500.00 | $5,500.00 | $0.00 | $5,500.00 |
Total | $0.00 | $5,500.00 | $5,500.00 | $0.00 | $5,500.00 |
Donors
The following were the top donors who contributed to the opposition committee.[12]
Donor | Cash Contributions | In-Kind Contributions | Total Contributions |
---|---|---|---|
Protect Our Kids | $0.00 | $5,500.00 | $5,500.00 |
Media editorials
- See also: 2022 ballot measure media endorsements
Ballotpedia identified the following media editorial boards as taking positions on the measure.
Ballotpedia lists the positions of media editorial boards that support or oppose ballot measures. This does not include opinion pieces from individuals or groups that do not represent the official position of a newspaper or media outlet. Ballotpedia includes editorials from newspapers and outlets based on circulation and readership, political coverage within a state, and length of publication. You can share media editorial board endorsements with us at [email protected].
Support
Opposition
You can share campaign information or arguments, along with source links for this information, at [email protected]
Polls
- See also: 2022 ballot measure polls
- Are you aware of a poll on this ballot measure that should be included below? You can share ballot measure polls, along with source links, with us at [email protected].
Maryland Question 4, Marijuana Legalization Amendment (2022) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Washington Post-University of Maryland | 9/22/2022-9/27/2022 | 810 RV | ± 4.0% | 73% | 23% | 4% |
Question: "Do you favor the legalization of the use of cannabis by an individual who is at least 21 years of age on or after July 1, 2023, in the state of Maryland?" | ||||||
Goucher College Poll | 9/8/2022-9/12/2022 | 748 LV | ± 3.6% | 59% | 34% | 7% |
Question: "Along with the various statewide and local races, a referendum on whether to legalize recreational marijuana for individuals aged 21 and older will appear on the ballot this November. Will you [vote for or vote against] the legalization of recreational marijuana?" | ||||||
Note: LV is likely voters, RV is registered voters, and EV is eligible voters. |
Background
House Bill 837
On April 1, 2022, the state legislature sent implementing legislation that was contingent upon the approval of the amendment to Governor Larry Hogan's (R) desk. House Bill 837 (HB 837) was passed by the state House on February 25, 2022, by a vote of 92-37. The Senate passed an amended version on March 31, 2022, by a vote of 30-15. The House concurred on April 1, with a vote of 89-41. Governor Hogan decided not to sign or veto the bill, allowing it to take effect upon approval of the amendment.
HB 837 was designed to temporarily expand decriminalization from January 1 to June 30, 2023. It decriminalized the possession and use of up to 1.5 ounces of marijuana with a civil fine of up to $100. Previously, the decriminalized amount was 10 grams. It also reduced the penalty for possession of more than 1.5 ounces but not exceeding 2.5 ounces to a civil fine of up to $250.
Beginning July 1, 2023, HB 837 legalized the personal use and possession of up to 1.5 ounces or 12 grams of concentrated cannabis for individuals 21 years of age or older. It also legalized the possession of up to two cannabis plants. It changed the criminal penalties for persons found possessing cannabis under the age of 21. The bill also automatically expunged convictions for conduct that was made legal under the law, and individuals serving time for such offenses became allowed to file for resentencing.
The bill required specific studies on the use of cannabis, the medical cannabis industry, and the adult-use cannabis industry. It also established the Cannabis Business Assistance Fund and the Cannabis Public Health Fund.[13]
The bill did not set up a licensing and regulatory framework for marijuana sales.[14]
Recreational marijuana in the U.S.
As of October 2022, 19 states and Washington, D.C., had legalized the possession and personal use of marijuana for recreational purposes.[15][16][17][18]
- In 11 states and D.C., the ballot initiative process was used to legalize marijuana.
- In one state, the legislature referred a measure to the ballot for voter approval.
- In seven states, bills to legalize marijuana were enacted into law.
The following table provides information about when and how recreational marijuana became legal.
Timeline and process of recreational marijuana legalization | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
State | Year legalized | Process used | Votes on ballot measures | ||
For | Against | ||||
Colorado | 2012 | Initiative | 55.32% | 45.68% | |
Washington | 2012 | Initiative | 55.70% | 44.30% | |
Alaska | 2014 | Initiative | 53.23% | 46.77% | |
Oregon | 2014 | Initiative | 56.11% | 43.89% | |
Washington, D.C. | 2014 | Initiative | 70.06% | 29.94% | |
California | 2016 | Initiative | 57.13% | 42.87% | |
Maine | 2016 | Initiative | 50.26% | 49.74% | |
Massachusetts | 2016 | Initiative | 53.66% | 46.34% | |
Nevada | 2016 | Initiative | 54.47% | 45.53% | |
Michigan | 2018 | Initiative | 55.89% | 44.11% | |
Vermont | 2018 | Legislation | N/A | N/A | |
Illinois | 2019 | Legislation | N/A | N/A | |
Arizona | 2020 | Initiative | 60.03% | 39.97% | |
Montana | 2020 | Initiative | 56.90% | 43.10% | |
New Jersey | 2020 | Referral | 67.08% | 32.92% | |
New York | 2021 | Legislation | N/A | N/A | |
Virginia | 2021 | Legislation | N/A | N/A | |
New Mexico | 2021 | Legislation | N/A | N/A | |
Connecticut | 2021 | Legislation | N/A | N/A | |
Rhode Island | 2022 | Legislation | N/A | N/A |
State political context of legalization ballot measures
The following table summarizes the political context surrounding recreational marijuana ballot measures, including whether the state's presidential voting history in the preceding three elections was Democratic, mixed, or Republican.
- Among states with Democratic presidential voting histories, eight marijuana legalization ballot measures were approved and one was defeated.
- Among states with Republican presidential voting histories, four marijuana legalization ballot measures were approved and six were defeated.
- Among states with mixed presidential voting histories, three marijuana legalization ballot measures were approved and one was defeated.
Partisan control of the 15 states approving marijuana legalization measures was Democratic in four states, divided in five states, and Republican in six states. Partisan control of the eight states rejecting marijuana legalization measures was Democratic in one state, mixed in one state, and Republican in six states.
Click "Show" to expand the table.
Political context surrounding recreational marijuana ballot measures since 2010 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
State | Measure | Year | Status | Presidential voting history[19] | State partisan control at time of vote |
California | Proposition 19 | 2010 | Democratic (Gore-Kerry-Obama) | Democratic | |
Colorado | Amendment 64 | 2012 | Mixed (Bush-Obama-Obama) | Divided | |
Washington | Initiative 502 | 2012 | Democratic (Kerry-Obama-Obama) | Democratic | |
Alaska | Measure 2 | 2014 | Republican (Bush-McCain-Romney) | Republican | |
Oregon | Measure 91 | 2014 | Democratic (Kerry-Obama-Obama) | Democratic | |
Ohio | Issue 3 | 2015 | Mixed (Bush-Obama-Obama) | Republican | |
Arizona | Proposition 205 | 2016 | Republican (McCain-Romney-Trump) | Republican | |
California | Proposition 64 | 2016 | Democratic (Obama-Obama-Clinton) | Democratic | |
Maine | Question 1 | 2016 | Democratic (Obama-Obama-Clinton) | Divided | |
Massachusetts | Question 4 | 2016 | Democratic (Obama-Obama-Clinton) | Divided | |
Nevada | Question 2 | 2016 | Democratic (Obama-Obama-Clinton) | Republican | |
North Dakota | Measure 3 | 2018 | Republican (McCain-Romney-Trump) | Republican | |
Michigan | Proposal 1 | 2018 | Mixed (Obama-Obama-Trump) | Republican | |
Arizona | Proposition 207 | 2020 | Mixed (Romney-Trump-Biden) | Republican | |
Montana | Initiative 190 | 2020 | Republican (Romney-Trump-Trump) | Divided | |
New Jersey | Amendment | 2020 | Democratic (Obama-Clinton-Biden) | Democratic | |
South Dakota | Amendment A | 2020 | Republican (Romney-Trump-Trump) | Republican | |
Arkansas | Issue 4 | 2022 | Republican (Romney-Trump-Trump) | Republican | |
Maryland | Question 4 | 2022 | Democratic (Obama-Clinton-Biden) | Divided | |
Missouri | Amendment 3 | 2022 | Republican (Romney-Trump-Trump) | Republican | |
North Dakota | Measure 2 | 2022 | Republican (Romney-Trump-Trump) | Republican | |
South Dakota | Measure 27 | 2022 | Republican (Romney-Trump-Trump) | Republican | |
Oklahoma | State Question 820 | 2023 | Republican (Romney-Trump-Trump) | Republican | |
Ohio | Issue 2 | 2023 | Mixed (Obama-Trump-Trump) | Republican |
Divided government in Maryland
- See also: State government trifectas
In 2022, Maryland had a divided government where Democrats controlled the Maryland General Assembly and a Republican, Larry Hogan, served as governor. The governor's signature was not needed to place the amendment on the ballot. Gov. Hogan chose to let HB 837, the implementing legislation, take effect without his signature. Democrats have controlled the state legislature since 1992, but Maryland became a divided government in 2015 with the election of Gov. Hogan.
Comparison of ballot measures to legalize recreational marijuana
The following table compares a selection of ballot measure provisions, such as possession limits, local control, taxes, and revenue dedications.
Click "Show" to expand the table.
Comparison of marijuana ballot measure provisions, 2012-2023 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Measure | Possession limits | Homegrown plants | Local control | State taxes | Revenue |
Marijuana legalization ballot measures that were approved, 2012-2023 | |||||
Ohio Issue 2 (2023) | • 2.5 ounces of marijuana and up to 15 grams of marijuana concentrates | • Six marijuana plants per individual or 12 plants per household | • A municipality cannot limit research on marijuana, levy a tax or fee on marijuana businesses, prohibit home growing of marijuana, or limit anything authorized by the initiative. A municipality can adopt an ordinance or resolution by a majority vote to prohibit or limit the number of cannabis operators in the territory. If such an ordinance or resolution is adopted, a dispensary needs to cease operations within 60 days. A dispensary can file a petition with the board of elections within the 60-day timeframe to request a public vote on whether or not the dispensary should remain open. | • 10% sales tax | • 36% to the cannabis social equity and jobs fund to fund the implementation of the program; 36% to the host community cannabis fund to provide funds to jurisdictions with adult-use dispensaries based on the percentage of adult-use tax attributable to each municipality or township; 25% to the substance abuse and addiction fund to fund the department of mental health and addiction services in alleviating substance and opiate abuse and supporting related research; and 3% to the division of cannabis control and tax commissioner fund to fund operations of the division of cannabis control. |
Maryland Question 4 (2022) | • Not specified | • Not specified | • Not specified | • Not specified | • Not specified |
Missouri Amendment 3 (2022) | • 3 ounces of marijuana | • Grow up to six flowering plants, six nonflowering plants, and six clones, if the person is registered to cultivate marijuana plants | • Local government may prohibit operation of all marijuana facilities located within its jurisdiction • Local government may enact ordinances governing time, place, and manner of operations of marijuana facilities, as well as the public smoking and consumption of marijuana products |
• 6% tax on retail price of recreational marijuana • Governing body of any local government may impose an additional sales tax to retail sales of marijuana that cannot exceed 3% |
• Veterans, Health, and Community Reinvestment Fund |
Arizona Proposition 207 (2020) | • 1 ounce of marijuana • 5 grams (0.18 ounces) of marijuana concentrate |
• Grow up to 6 marijuana plants | • Municipalities allowed to ban or limit marijuana establishments within their boundaries | • 16% excise sales tax | • community college districts • police and fire departments and fire districts • highways • new criminal justice fund (restorative programs, mentoring, and behavioral health) |
Montana I-190 (2020) | • 1 ounce of marijuana | • Individuals could grow up to four marijuana plants and four seedling in a private residence in a locked space | • A local government is not allowed to completely ban marijuana cultivators, testing facilities, wholesalers, or retail stores from operating in its limits; cannot prohibit the transportation of marijuana on public roads in its jurisdiction by those who are licensed to do so; allowed to pass ordinances to regulate an adult-use provider or adult-use marijuana-infused products that operate in its jurisdiction | • 20% sales tax | • After the tax revenue is used by the Department of Revenue to cover costs associated with implementing the initiative, 10.5% of the remaining revenue would be appropriated to the state's general fund, and the remainder would be appropriated to conservation programs, substance abuse treatment, veterans’ services, healthcare costs, and localities where marijuana is sold |
New Jersey Amendment (2020) | • Not specified | • Not specified | • Not specified | • Subject to state sales tax • Prohibits additional state sales taxes on marijuana |
• Not specified |
Michigan Proposal 1 (2018) | • 2.5 ounces of marijuana • 0.5 ounces of marijuana concentrate |
•Grow up to 12 marijuana plants | •Municipalities allowed to ban or limit marijuana establishments within their boundaries | •10% excise sales tax | •local governments •K-12 education •road and bridge maintenance |
California Proposition 64 (2016) | • 1 ounce of marijuana • 0.3 ounces of marijuana concentrate |
•Grow up to 6 marijuana plants | •Municipalities allowed to ban or limit marijuana establishments within their boundaries | •15% excise sales tax •$9.25/ounce cultivation tax for flowers •$2.75/ounce cultivation tax for leaves |
•youth drug education, prevention, and treatment •prevent and fix environmental damage from illegal marijuana producers •marijuana DUI prevention and negative health effects programs |
Nevada Question 2 (2016) | • 1 ounce of marijuana • 0.125 ounces of marijuana concentrate |
•Grow up to 6 marijuana plants | •Permits local ballot measures pertaining to zoning and land use for marijuana establishments | •15% excise sales | •K-12 education |
Maine Question 1 (2016) | • 2.5 ounces of marijuana and/or marijuana concentrate | • Grow up to 6 marijuana plants | • Municipalities allowed to ban or limit marijuana establishments within their boundaries | • 10% excise sales tax •The legislature added a $20.94/ounce cultivation tax on flowers and mature plants; $5.88/ounce cultivation tax on marijuana trim; $1.50 tax per immature plant; $0.30 tax per immature plant |
•General Fund (legislature added public health programs and law enforcement programs) |
Massachusetts Question 4 (2016) | • 10 ounces of marijuana in one's home • 1 ounce of marijuana in public • 0.2 ounces of marijuana concentrate |
• Grow up to 6 marijuana plants | • Municipalities allowed to limit number of establishments and restrict the time, place, and manner of their operation • Permits local ballot measures to ban or limit marijuana establishments within their boundaries |
• 3.75% excise sales tax (legislature increased to 10.75%) | • General Fund |
Alaska Measure 2 (2014) | • 1 ounce of marijuana | • Grow up to 6 marijuana plants | • Municipalities allowed to ban or limit marijuana establishments within their boundaries | • $50/ounce cultivation tax | • General Fund |
Oregon Measure 91 (2014) | • 8 ounces of marijuana in one's home • 1 ounce of marijuana in public • 1 ounce of marijuana concentrate |
• Grow up to 4 marijuana plants | • Permits local ballot measures to ban or limit marijuana establishments | • 17% excise sales tax (legislature added the excise sales tax) • $35/ounce producer tax for flowers • $10/ounce producer tax for leaves |
• K-12 education • drug prevention and treatment • state police • local law enforcement |
Colorado Amendment 64 (2012) | • 1 ounce of marijuana • 1 ounce of marijuana concentrate |
• Grow up to 6 marijuana plants | • Municipalities allowed to ban or limit marijuana establishments within their boundaries | •Required the state legislature to enact taxes •In 2013, the legislature's Proposition AA enacted a 15% excise tax on unprocessed retail marijuana and 10% (increased to 15% in 2017) sales tax on retail sales |
• K-12 public education • Proposition AA added allocations for local governments, healthcare, substance abuse prevention and treatment, and law enforcement |
Washington Initiative 502 (2012) | • 1 ounce of marijuana • 0.25 ounce of marijuana concentrate |
• Illegal | • Municipalities allowed to ban or limit marijuana establishments within their boundaries | •25% excise sales tax (legislature increased the tax to 37%) | • research • drug prevention, public health education • healthcare • dropout prevention, intervention • General Fund |
Path to the ballot
- See also: Amending the Maryland Constitution
To put a legislatively referred constitutional amendment before voters, a 60% vote is required in both the Maryland State Senate and the Maryland House of Representatives.
Question 4 was introduced as House Bill 1 (HB 1) on January 12, 2022, by Delegate Luke Clippinger (D). It was approved in the state House in a vote of 96-34 on February 25, 2022. All but one Republican voted against the measure. On April 1, 2022, the state Senate voted to pass the measure with amendments by a vote of 29-17. Two Democrats, Sens. Joanne Benson and Jill Carter, voted with the Republican minority against the bill. On the same day, the state House voted to concur with the amendment by a vote of 94-39. Two Democrats, Delegates Debra Davis and Geraldine Valentino-Smith, joined the Republican minority in voting against the bill. One Republican, Delegate Carl Anderton Jr., voted in favor of the bill.[1]
|
|
How to cast a vote
- See also: Voting in Maryland
Click "Show" to learn more about current voter registration rules, identification requirements, and poll times in Maryland.
How to cast a vote in Maryland | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Poll timesIn Maryland, all polling places are open from 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. Eastern Time. An individual who is in line at the time polls close must be allowed to vote.[20] Registration
According to the Maryland State Board of Elections, to register to vote in Maryland, one must be a United States citizen and Maryland resident who is at least 16 years old. Although a 16-year-old can register to vote, he or she cannot vote in an election unless he or she will be 18 at the time of the next general election (i.e., 17-year-olds are permitted to vote in primary elections, so long as they'll be 18 by the time of the corresponding general election).[21] Maryland allows same-day voter registration during the early voting period and on Election Day.[21] Voters may register online, by mail, or in person at one of the following locations:[21]
Automatic registrationMaryland automatically registers eligible individuals to vote through the Motor Vehicle Administration.[15] Online registration
Maryland has implemented an online voter registration system. Residents can register to vote by visiting this website.[15] Same-day registrationMaryland allows same-day voter registration.[15] Residency requirementsMaryland law requires 21 days of residency in the state before a person may vote. Verification of citizenshipMayland does not require proof of citizenship for voter registration. An individual applying to register to vote must attest that they are a U.S. citizen under penalty of perjury. Several local jurisdictions in Maryland permit noncitizens to vote in at least some local elections. These jurisdictions maintain separate voter registration systems for noncitizen voters. See here for more information. All 49 states with voter registration systems require applicants to declare that they are U.S. citizens in order to register to vote in state and federal elections, under penalty of perjury or other punishment.[22] As of November 2024, five states — Alabama, Arizona, Georgia, Kansas, and New Hampshire — had passed laws requiring verification of citizenship at the time of voter registration. However, only two of those states' laws were in effect, in Arizona and New Hampshire. In three states — California, Maryland, and Vermont — at least one local jurisdiction allowed noncitizens to vote in some local elections as of November 2024. Noncitizens registering to vote in those elections must complete a voter registration application provided by the local jurisdiction and are not eligible to register as state or federal voters. Verifying your registrationThe voter lookup page, run by the Maryland Board of Elections, allows residents to check their voter registration status online. Voter ID requirementsMaryland does not require voters to present identification while voting, in most cases.[23] A voter will be asked to show ID in the following circumstances:
The following list of accepted ID was current as of October 2024. Click here for the Maryland Attorney General's voting information page to ensure you have the most current information.
|
See also
External links
Support |
OppositionSubmit links to [email protected]. |
Footnotes
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 Maryland State Legislature, "Overview of HB 1," accessed February 28, 2022
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 Maryland State Legislature, "House Bill 1 text," accessed February 28, 2022
- ↑ Maryland State Legislature, "House Bill 556," accessed April 10, 2023
- ↑ NORML, "Maryland Laws and Penalties," accessed April 12, 2022
- ↑ Procon.org, "Maryland Medical Marijuana Laws Prior to Legalization," June 15, 2016
- ↑ Smart Approaches to Marijuana, "MJ Laws Map," accessed June 15, 2022
- ↑ Marijuana Policy Project, "Map of state marijuana laws," accessed June 15, 2022
- ↑ This number does not include South Dakota, where voters approved a marijuana legalization initiative in 2020 that was later struck down by the state's supreme court
- ↑ 9.0 9.1 9.2 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source. Cite error: Invalid
<ref>
tag; name "quotedisclaimer" defined multiple times with different content Cite error: Invalid<ref>
tag; name "quotedisclaimer" defined multiple times with different content - ↑ Leaf Magazines, "Yes On 4 Legalization Campaign Kicks Off In Maryland," accessed September 12, 2022
- ↑ Protect Maryland Kids, "Home," accessed October 21, 2022
- ↑ 12.0 12.1 12.2 12.3 12.4 Maryland Campaign Finance, "Search," accessed August 30, 2022
- ↑ Maryland State Legislature, "House Bill 837," accessed April 4, 2022
- ↑ Marijuana Policy Project, "Summary of Maryland's HB 837 and SB 833: Cannabis Reform," accessed April 20, 2022
- ↑ 15.0 15.1 15.2 15.3 NCSL, "State Profiles: Elections," accessed August 25, 2024
- ↑ Smart Approaches to Marijuana, "MJ Laws Map," accessed June 15, 2022
- ↑ Marijuana Policy Project, "Map of state marijuana laws," accessed June 15, 2022
- ↑ This number does not include South Dakota, where voters approved a marijuana legalization initiative in 2020 that was later struck down by the state's supreme court
- ↑ Prior three elections before and/or including the election at which measure was voted on
- ↑ Maryland State Board of Elections, "Rules and Information for Voters," accessed April 18, 2023
- ↑ 21.0 21.1 21.2 Maryland State Board of Elections, "Introduction," accessed April 18, 2023
- ↑ Under federal law, the national mail voter registration application (a version of which is in use in all states with voter registration systems) requires applicants to indicate that they are U.S. citizens in order to complete an application to vote in state or federal elections, but does not require voters to provide documentary proof of citizenship. According to the U.S. Department of Justice, the application "may require only the minimum amount of information necessary to prevent duplicate voter registrations and permit State officials both to determine the eligibility of the applicant to vote and to administer the voting process."
- ↑ Maryland Attorney General, "Voting FAQ," accessed April 13, 2023
State of Maryland Annapolis (capital) | |
---|---|
Elections |
What's on my ballot? | Elections in 2024 | How to vote | How to run for office | Ballot measures |
Government |
Who represents me? | U.S. President | U.S. Congress | Federal courts | State executives | State legislature | State and local courts | Counties | Cities | School districts | Public policy |