City elections in Tampa, Florida (2019)
Special state legislative • Local ballot measures • Municipal • How to run for office |
2023 →
← 2016
|
2019 Tampa elections |
---|
Election dates |
Filing deadline: January 18, 2019 |
General election: March 5, 2019 Runoff election: April 23, 2019 |
Election stats |
Offices up: Mayor and all 7 city council seats |
Total seats up: 8 (click here for mayoral elections) |
Election type: Nonpartisan |
Other municipal elections |
U.S. municipal elections, 2019 |
The city of Tampa, Florida, held general elections for mayor and all 7 city council seats on March 5, 2019. A runoff election was scheduled for April 23, 2019. The filing deadline for this election was January 18, 2019.[1]
Click here to learn more about the city's mayoral election.
Elections
Click on the tabs below to show more information about those topics.
Candidates and results
District 1
General runoff candidates
- Joseph Citro (Nonpartisan) ✔
- Walter Smith (Nonpartisan)
General election candidates
- Joseph Citro (Nonpartisan) ✔
- Alan Clendenin (Nonpartisan)
- David Loos (Nonpartisan)
- Craig Newman (Nonpartisan)
- Walter Smith (Nonpartisan) ✔
District 2
General election candidates
- Charlie Miranda (Incumbent) (Nonpartisan) ✔
- John Godwin (Nonpartisan)
- Joe Robinson (Nonpartisan)
= candidate completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey
District 3
General runoff candidates
- John Dingfelder (Nonpartisan) ✔
- Stephen Lytle (Nonpartisan)
= candidate completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey
General election candidates
- John Dingfelder (Nonpartisan) ✔
- Nicholas Glover (Nonpartisan)
- Stephen Lytle (Nonpartisan) ✔
- Vibha Shevade (Nonpartisan)
= candidate completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey
District 4
General election candidates
- Bill Carlson (Nonpartisan) ✔
- Sal Guagliardo Jr. (Nonpartisan)
- Lee Lowry (Nonpartisan)
District 5
General runoff candidates
- Orlando Gudes (Nonpartisan) ✔
- Jeffrey Rhodes (Nonpartisan)
General election candidates
- Ella Coffee (Nonpartisan)
- Todd Cole (Nonpartisan)
- Orlando Gudes (Nonpartisan) ✔
- Jeffrey Rhodes (Nonpartisan) ✔
- Ralph Smith (Nonpartisan)
District 6
General election candidates
- Guido Maniscalco (Incumbent) (Nonpartisan) ✔
- Wendy Pepe (Nonpartisan)
District 7
General election candidates
- Luis Viera (Incumbent) (Nonpartisan) ✔
- Quinton Robinson (Nonpartisan)
Endorsements
Do you know of an official or organization that endorsed a candidate in this race? Let Ballotpedia know by email at [email protected].
Past elections
2016
Tampa City Council District 7
Tampa City Council District 7, Runoff Election, 2016 | ||
---|---|---|
Candidate | Vote % | Votes |
Luis Viera | 50.62% | 2,591 |
Jim Davison | 49.38% | 2,526 |
Total Votes | 5,117 | |
Source: Hillsborough County Supervisor of Elections, "2016 Runoff Election Official Results," accessed December 7, 2016 |
Tampa City Council District 7, General Election, 2016 | ||
---|---|---|
Candidate | Vote % | Votes |
Jim Davison | 30.64% | 9,159 |
Luis Viera | 22.38% | 6,690 |
Avis Harrison | 16.00% | 4,781 |
Orlando Gudes | 14.12% | 4,220 |
Cyril Spiro | 12.44% | 3,719 |
Gene Siudut | 4.41% | 1,319 |
Total Votes | 29,888 | |
Source: Hillsborough County Supervisor of Elections, "2016 General Election Official Results," accessed November 28, 2016 |
2015
- See also: Tampa, Florida municipal elections, 2015
Mayor of Tampa
Mayor of Tampa, 2015 | |||
---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Vote % | Votes | |
Bob Buckhorn Incumbent | 95.9% | 24,607 | |
Jose Vazquez | 4.1% | 1,049 | |
Total Votes | 25,656 | ||
Source: Hillsborough County Supervisor of Elections, "Official general election results," accessed May 28, 2015 |
Tampa City Council District 1
Tampa City Council, District 1 General Election, 2015 | |||
---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Vote % | Votes | |
Mike Suarez Incumbent | 62.1% | 15,474 | |
Susan Long | 37.9% | 9,432 | |
Total Votes | 24,906 | ||
Source: Hillsborough County Supervisor of Elections, "Official general election results," accessed May 28, 2015 |
Tampa City Council District 2
Tampa City Council, District 2 General Election, 2015 | |||
---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Vote % | Votes | |
Charlie Miranda | 59% | 15,268 | |
Julie Ann Jenkins | 31.9% | 8,264 | |
Joseph V. Citro | 9.1% | 2,345 | |
Total Votes | 25,877 | ||
Source: Hillsborough County Supervisor of Elections, "Official general election results," accessed May 28, 2015 |
Tampa City Council District 3
Tampa City Council, District 3 General Election, 2015 | |||
---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Vote % | Votes | |
Yvonne Yolie Capin Incumbent | 73.2% | 18,154 | |
Paul Erni | 26.8% | 6,636 | |
Total Votes | 24,790 | ||
Source: Hillsborough County Supervisor of Elections, "Official general election results," accessed May 28, 2015 |
Tampa City Council District 4
Tampa City Council, District 4 General Election, 2015 | |||
---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Vote % | Votes | |
Harry Cohen Incumbent | 71.2% | 6,999 | |
Kent S. King | 28.8% | 2,825 | |
Total Votes | 9,824 | ||
Source: Hillsborough County Supervisor of Elections, "Official general election results," accessed May 28, 2015 |
Tampa City Council District 6
Tampa City Council, District 6 Runoff Election, 2015 | |||
---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Vote % | Votes | |
Guido Maniscalco | 51% | 3,731 | |
Jackie Toledo | 49% | 3,582 | |
Total Votes | 7,313 | ||
Source: Hillsborough County Supervisor of Elections, "Official runoff election results," accessed May 28, 2015 |
Tampa City Council, District 6 General Election, 2015 | |||
---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Vote % | Votes | |
Jackie Toledo | 46% | 3,720 | |
Guido Maniscalco | 29.1% | 2,350 | |
Thomas Clark Castellano | 24.9% | 2,017 | |
Total Votes | 8,087 | ||
Source: Hillsborough County Supervisor of Elections, "Official general election results," accessed May 28, 2015 |
Ballot measures
- See also: March 5, 2019 ballot measures in Florida
• Amendment 1: Tampa City Charter Revisions
A yes vote was a vote in favor of revisions to the city charter, including removal of references to gender, redundancies, and obsolete provisions; correction of typographical errors; clarification of ambiguities; and inclusion of statuatory references where appropriate. |
A no vote was a vote against the revisions of the city charter listed above. |
• Amendment 2: Tampa Use of Latest Census Figures for Electoral Districts
A yes vote was a vote in favor of amending the city charter to require the City County
Planning Commission to use the latest official census figures to make city electoral districts as equal in populations as required by the U.S. Constitution before each municipal election. |
A no vote was a vote against amending the city charter to require the City County Planning Commission to use the latest official census figures to make city electoral districts as equal in populations as required by the U.S. Constitution before each municipal election. |
• Amendment 3: Tampa City Council Additional Staff
A yes vote was a vote in favor of amending the city charter to allow city council members each to employ a full-time legislative aid and to hire additional staff with the approval of five members. |
A no vote was a vote against amending the city charter to allow city council members each to employ a full-time legislative aid and to hire additional staff with the approval of five members. |
• Amendment 4: Tampa Timeline for Posting Ordinances to City Website
A yes vote was a vote in favor of amending the city charter to provide that all city ordinances be posted to the city website within at least seven days before adoption. |
A no vote was a vote against amending the city charter to provide that all city ordinances be posted to the city website within at least seven days before adoption. |
• Amendment 5: Tampa City Clerk Custody of City Documents
A yes vote was a vote in favor of amending the city charter to place all city documents under the custody of the city clerk and to require the city clerk to carry out any other duties by ordinance. |
A no vote was a vote against amending the city charter to place all city documents under the custody of the city clerk and to require the city clerk to carry out any other duties by ordinance. |
• Amendment 6: Tampa Civil Services Requirements Clarification
A yes vote was a vote in favor of amending the city charter to clarify that civil service requirements for appointment and compensation do not apply to officers, directors, managers, and supervisors not covered by civil service. |
A no vote was a vote against amending the city charter to clarify that civil service requirements for appointment and compensation do not apply to officers, directors, managers, and supervisors not covered by civil service. |
• Amendment 7: Tampa City Council Chairman Role Clarification
A yes vote was a vote in favor of amending the city charter to clarify that the city council chairman does not become the acting mayor when the mayor is outside of city boundaries or when the mayor is unable to serve. |
A no vote was a vote against amending the city charter to clarify that the city council chairman does not become the acting mayor when the mayor is outside of city boundaries or when the mayor is unable to serve. |
• Amendment 8: Tampa Mayoral Power Over Departments and Boards
A yes vote was a vote in favor of amending the city charter to permit the mayor to establish, create, combine, or abolish departments or boards with a two-thirds vote of the city council, with the exception for the following: legal, revenue and finance, internal audit, police, fire rescue, the civil service, city employees retirement fund, and fire fighters and police officers pension fund. |
A no vote was a vote against amending the city charter to permit the mayor to establish, create, combine, or abolish certain departments or boards with a two-thirds vote of the city council. |
• Amendment 9: Tampa Mayoral Direction of City Officers and Employees
A yes vote was a vote in favor of amending the city charter to provide that the duties of city officers and employees be under the direction of the mayor and not the city council, with the exception that the city council be permitted to establish, create, combine, or abolish departments and their duties. |
A no vote was a vote against amending the city charter to provide that the duties of city officers and employees be under the direction of the mayor and not the city council, with the exception that the city council be permitted to establish, create, combine, or abolish departments and their duties. |
• Amendment 10: Governance and Residency Requirements
A yes vote was a vote in favor of amending the city charter to identify which officers, boards, and elected officials shall govern the city and to allow the city council to waive the residency requirements of department heads for one year, with two more consecutive extensions, with the approval of at least five council members. |
A no vote was a vote against amending the city charter to identify which officers, boards, and elected officials shall govern the city and to allow the city council to waive the residency requirements of department heads for one year, with two more consecutive extensions, with the approval of at least five council members. |
• Amendment 11: Tampa Extension for Mayoral Appointment Submission
A yes vote was a vote in favor of amending the city charter to extend the time for the mayor to submit an appointment to the city council for approval from 30 days to 90 days. |
A no vote was a vote against amending the city charter to extend the time for the mayor to submit an appointment to the city council for approval from 30 days to 90 days. |
• Amendment 12: Tampa Clarification for Diverting Funds
A yes vote was a vote in favor of amending the city charter to clarify that funds may be diverted from their original intent if the new purpose is provided in the document authorizing the funds. |
A no vote was a vote against amending the city charter to clarify that funds may be diverted from their original intent if the new purpose is provided in the document authorizing the funds. |
• Amendment 13: Tampa Permitted City Investments
A yes vote was a vote in favor of amending the city charter to allow the city to invest in any funds permitted under Florida Statute 215.47, except for mortgage-backed securities. |
A no vote was a vote against amending the city charter to allow the city to invest in any funds permitted under Florida Statute 215.47, except for mortgage-backed securities. |
• Amendment 14: Tampa Creation of Standing Boards and Ad Hoc Committees
A yes vote was a vote in favor of amending the city charter to allow the creation of standing boards by ordinance and the creation of ad hoc committees by resolution with mayoral support. |
A no vote was a vote against amending the city charter to allow the creation of standing boards by ordinance and the creation of ad hoc committees by resolution with mayoral support. |
• Amendment 15: Tampa Mayor and Council Elections Statutory Provision
A yes vote was a vote in favor of amending the city charter to add the statutory provision that outlines election requirements for the mayor and city council, including qualifications, election dates, the manner to fill vacancies, and the date to take office. |
A no vote was a vote against amending the city charter to add the statutory provision that outlines election requirements for the mayor and city council, including qualifications, election dates, the manner to fill vacancies, and the date to take office. |
• Amendment 16: Tampa City Employee Discrimination Prohibition
A yes vote was a vote in favor of amending the city charter to prohibit discrimination by city officials and employees based on sexual orientation, pregnancy, age, marital status, familial status, disability, gender identification, genetic information, ethnicity, and any others prohibited by law, and to provide anti-discrimination training for all city employees. |
A no vote was a vote against amending the city charter to prohibit discrimination by city officials and employees based on sexual orientation, pregnancy, age, marital status, familial status, disability, gender identification, genetic information, ethnicity, and any others prohibited by law, and to provide anti-discrimination training for all city employees. |
• Amendment 17: Tampa Charter Review Commission
A yes vote was a vote in favor of amending the city charter to establish a nine-member charter review commission to review the charter every 10 years, beginning in 2027. |
A no vote was a vote against amending the city charter to establish a nine-member charter review commission to review the charter every 10 years, beginning in 2027. |
• Amendment 18: Tampa Proposing and Voting on Changes to City Charter
A yes vote was a vote in favor of amending the city charter to provide for the city council to propose charter amendments through ordinances to be voted upon at the upcoming general election and to allow citizen initiatives by a petition of 10 percent of voters in the last election. |
A no vote was a vote against amending the city charter to provide for the city council to propose charter amendments through ordinances to be voted upon at the upcoming general election and to allow citizen initiatives by a petition of 10 percent of voters in the last election. |
Additional elections on the ballot
- See also: Florida elections, 2019
What was at stake?
Report a story for this election
Ballotpedia researches issues in local elections across the United States, but information availability is a challenge for us in many areas. Please contact us about the issues that impact your local election. Note that not all submissions may meet Ballotpedia's coverage requirements for inclusion.
Candidate survey
Ballotpedia invites candidates to participate in its annual survey. |
About the city
- See also: Tampa, Florida
Tampa is a city in Hillsborough County, Florida. As of 2010, its population was 335,709.
City government
- See also: Mayor-council government
The city of Tampa uses a strong mayor and city council system. In this form of municipal government, the city council serves as the city's primary legislative body while the mayor serves as the city's chief executive.
Demographics
The following table displays demographic data provided by the United States Census Bureau.
.placeholder {} .census-table-container { width: 100%; max-width: 500px; overflow-x: auto; } .census-table-widget { text-align: center; border: 1px solid black !important; } .census-table-header { background-color: #334aab; color: white; padding: 0.5em 1em; } .census-table-census-item-header { text-align: left !important; font-weight: normal !important; background-color: #D9D9D9; padding-left: 0.25em; padding-right: 0.25em; } .census-table-census-item { text-align: center !important; font-weight: normal !important; } .census-table-section-header { background-color: #f0a236; font-style: italic; } .census-table-source { font-size: 80%; } .census-table-race-disclaimer { font-size: 70%; border-top: 1px solid #ccc; }
Demographic Data for Tampa, Florida | ||
---|---|---|
Tampa | Florida | |
Population | 335,709 | 18,801,310 |
Land area (sq mi) | 114 | 53,651 |
Race and ethnicity** | ||
White | 65.4% | 75.1% |
Black/African American | 23.6% | 16.1% |
Asian | 4.3% | 2.7% |
Native American | 0.3% | 0.3% |
Pacific Islander | 0.1% | 0.1% |
Two or more | 3.9% | 2.7% |
Hispanic/Latino | 26.4% | 25.6% |
Education | ||
High school graduation rate | 87.9% | 88.2% |
College graduation rate | 38.6% | 29.9% |
Income | ||
Median household income | $53,833 | $55,660 |
Persons below poverty level | 18.6% | 14% |
Source: population provided by U.S. Census Bureau, "Decennial Census" (2010). Other figures provided by U.S. Census Bureau, "American Community Survey" (5-year estimates 2014-2019). | ||
**Note: Percentages for race and ethnicity may add up to more than 100 percent because respondents may report more than one race and the Hispanic/Latino ethnicity may be selected in conjunction with any race. Read more about race and ethnicity in the census here. |
State profile
- See also: Florida and Florida elections, 2019
Partisan data
The information in this section was current as of May 7, 2019
Presidential voting pattern
- Florida voted Republican in four out of the six presidential elections between 2000 and 2020.
Congressional delegation
- Following the 2018 elections, both of the U.S. Senators from Florida were Republicans.
- Florida had 13 Democratic and 14 Republican U.S. Representatives.
State executives
- Democrats held one of Florida's 16 state executive offices and Republicans held six. Elections for the other offices are nonpartisan.
- Florida's governor was Republican Ron DeSantis.
State legislature
- Republicans controlled the Florida State Senate with a 23-17 majority.
- Republicans controlled the Florida House of Representatives with a 71-46 majority, while three seats were vacant.
Florida Party Control: 1992-2024
One year of a Democratic trifecta • Twenty-six years of Republican trifectas
Scroll left and right on the table below to view more years.
Year | 92 | 93 | 94 | 95 | 96 | 97 | 98 | 99 | 00 | 01 | 02 | 03 | 04 | 05 | 06 | 07 | 08 | 09 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Governor | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | I | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R |
Senate | D | S | S | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R |
House | D | D | D | D | D | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R |
|
|
Demographic data for Florida | ||
---|---|---|
Florida | U.S. | |
Total population: | 20,244,914 | 316,515,021 |
Land area (sq mi): | 53,625 | 3,531,905 |
Race and ethnicity** | ||
White: | 76% | 73.6% |
Black/African American: | 16.1% | 12.6% |
Asian: | 2.6% | 5.1% |
Native American: | 0.3% | 0.8% |
Pacific Islander: | 0.1% | 0.2% |
Two or more: | 2.4% | 3% |
Hispanic/Latino: | 23.7% | 17.1% |
Education | ||
High school graduation rate: | 86.9% | 86.7% |
College graduation rate: | 27.3% | 29.8% |
Income | ||
Median household income: | $47,507 | $53,889 |
Persons below poverty level: | 19.8% | 11.3% |
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, "American Community Survey" (5-year estimates 2010-2015) Click here for more information on the 2020 census and here for more on its impact on the redistricting process in Florida. **Note: Percentages for race and ethnicity may add up to more than 100 percent because respondents may report more than one race and the Hispanic/Latino ethnicity may be selected in conjunction with any race. Read more about race and ethnicity in the census here. |
Pivot Counties
- See also: Pivot Counties by state
Four of 67 Florida counties—6 percent—are Pivot Counties. Pivot Counties are counties that voted for Barack Obama (D) in 2008 and 2012 and for Donald Trump (R) in 2016. Altogether, the nation had 206 Pivot Counties, with most being concentrated in upper midwestern and northeastern states.
Counties won by Trump in 2016 and Obama in 2012 and 2008 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
County | Trump margin of victory in 2016 | Obama margin of victory in 2012 | Obama margin of victory in 2008 | ||||
Jefferson County, Florida | 5.06% | 1.75% | 3.66% | ||||
Monroe County, Florida | 6.82% | 0.44% | 4.90% | ||||
Pinellas County, Florida | 1.11% | 5.65% | 8.25% | ||||
St. Lucie County, Florida | 2.40% | 7.86% | 12.12% |
In the 2016 presidential election, Donald Trump (R) won Florida with 49 percent of the vote. Hillary Clinton (D) received 47.8 percent. Florida was considered a key battleground state in the 2016 general election. In presidential elections between 1900 and 2016, Florida voted Democratic 56.67 percent of the time and Republican 43.33 percent of the time. Florida went to the Republicans in 2000, 2004, and 2016, and it went to the Democrats in 2008 and 2012.
Presidential results by legislative district
The following table details results of the 2012 and 2016 presidential elections by state House districts in Florida. Click [show] to expand the table. The "Obama," "Romney," "Clinton," and "Trump" columns describe the percent of the vote each presidential candidate received in the district. The "2012 Margin" and "2016 Margin" columns describe the margin of victory between the two presidential candidates in those years. The "Party Control" column notes which party held that seat heading into the 2018 general election. Data on the results of the 2012 and 2016 presidential elections broken down by state legislative districts was compiled by Daily Kos.[2][3]
In 2012, Barack Obama (D) won 55 out of 120 state House districts in Florida with an average margin of victory of 29.1 points. In 2016, Hillary Clinton (D) won 54 out of 120 state House districts in Florida with an average margin of victory of 30.3 points. Clinton won 14 districts controlled by Republicans heading into the 2018 elections. |
In 2012, Mitt Romney (R) won 65 out of 120 state House districts in Florida with an average margin of victory of 17.7 points. In 2016, Donald Trump (R) won 66 out of 120 state House districts in Florida with an average margin of victory of 21.1 points. Trump won two districts controlled by Democrats heading into the 2018 elections. |
2016 presidential results by state House district | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
District | Obama | Romney | 2012 Margin | Clinton | Trump | 2016 Margin | Party Control |
1 | 36.20% | 62.79% | R+26.6 | 34.08% | 62.44% | R+28.4 | R |
2 | 40.60% | 58.27% | R+17.7 | 39.85% | 55.53% | R+15.7 | R |
3 | 22.07% | 76.75% | R+54.7 | 19.63% | 76.01% | R+56.4 | R |
4 | 25.64% | 73.07% | R+47.4 | 24.90% | 69.68% | R+44.8 | R |
5 | 25.87% | 73.02% | R+47.2 | 21.51% | 76.01% | R+54.5 | R |
6 | 28.12% | 70.72% | R+42.6 | 25.59% | 70.40% | R+44.8 | R |
7 | 35.78% | 63.03% | R+27.3 | 29.54% | 67.81% | R+38.3 | R |
8 | 76.69% | 22.32% | D+54.4 | 74.29% | 22.33% | D+52 | D |
9 | 52.23% | 46.70% | D+5.5 | 52.98% | 42.92% | D+10.1 | D |
10 | 29.54% | 69.49% | R+40 | 24.47% | 73.15% | R+48.7 | R |
11 | 29.10% | 69.98% | R+40.9 | 28.75% | 67.52% | R+38.8 | R |
12 | 38.82% | 60.18% | R+21.4 | 39.91% | 55.90% | R+16 | R |
13 | 66.27% | 33.01% | D+33.3 | 64.06% | 33.01% | D+31.1 | D |
14 | 67.05% | 32.34% | D+34.7 | 64.74% | 32.99% | D+31.8 | D |
15 | 43.22% | 55.85% | R+12.6 | 43.85% | 52.54% | R+8.7 | R |
16 | 36.02% | 63.09% | R+27.1 | 38.53% | 57.46% | R+18.9 | R |
17 | 29.91% | 69.15% | R+39.2 | 31.55% | 64.91% | R+33.4 | R |
18 | 27.33% | 71.82% | R+44.5 | 27.27% | 69.17% | R+41.9 | R |
19 | 31.02% | 68.02% | R+37 | 25.79% | 71.54% | R+45.8 | R |
20 | 65.02% | 33.40% | D+31.6 | 63.38% | 32.58% | D+30.8 | D |
21 | 47.01% | 51.55% | R+4.5 | 47.92% | 47.87% | D+0.1 | R |
22 | 40.28% | 58.79% | R+18.5 | 35.09% | 62.28% | R+27.2 | R |
23 | 38.65% | 60.23% | R+21.6 | 31.70% | 65.06% | R+33.4 | R |
24 | 41.79% | 57.34% | R+15.6 | 35.96% | 61.17% | R+25.2 | R |
25 | 43.38% | 55.73% | R+12.4 | 37.23% | 59.47% | R+22.2 | R |
26 | 57.57% | 41.40% | D+16.2 | 49.01% | 47.49% | D+1.5 | D |
27 | 50.25% | 48.70% | D+1.6 | 42.51% | 54.04% | R+11.5 | R |
28 | 46.01% | 52.86% | R+6.9 | 46.02% | 49.59% | R+3.6 | R |
29 | 44.35% | 54.70% | R+10.4 | 45.97% | 50.16% | R+4.2 | R |
30 | 50.06% | 48.88% | D+1.2 | 51.93% | 43.61% | D+8.3 | R |
31 | 40.55% | 58.49% | R+17.9 | 37.12% | 59.50% | R+22.4 | R |
32 | 43.05% | 56.11% | R+13.1 | 40.66% | 56.10% | R+15.4 | R |
33 | 33.03% | 66.40% | R+33.4 | 29.41% | 68.70% | R+39.3 | R |
34 | 38.74% | 60.18% | R+21.4 | 28.67% | 68.26% | R+39.6 | R |
35 | 45.66% | 53.25% | R+7.6 | 34.40% | 62.35% | R+28 | R |
36 | 51.81% | 46.55% | D+5.3 | 37.97% | 58.18% | R+20.2 | R |
37 | 42.35% | 56.41% | R+14.1 | 34.77% | 61.75% | R+27 | R |
38 | 44.80% | 54.00% | R+9.2 | 39.90% | 56.32% | R+16.4 | R |
39 | 43.29% | 55.62% | R+12.3 | 38.74% | 57.77% | R+19 | R |
40 | 46.30% | 52.68% | R+6.4 | 41.48% | 54.62% | R+13.1 | R |
41 | 48.78% | 50.29% | R+1.5 | 45.76% | 51.24% | R+5.5 | R |
42 | 49.88% | 49.23% | D+0.7 | 46.82% | 49.98% | R+3.2 | R |
43 | 74.04% | 25.31% | D+48.7 | 73.13% | 24.03% | D+49.1 | D |
44 | 45.77% | 53.48% | R+7.7 | 51.21% | 45.05% | D+6.2 | R |
45 | 68.39% | 30.95% | D+37.4 | 67.75% | 29.32% | D+38.4 | D |
46 | 85.10% | 14.40% | D+70.7 | 82.72% | 14.71% | D+68 | D |
47 | 49.79% | 49.04% | D+0.8 | 53.85% | 41.40% | D+12.5 | R |
48 | 71.31% | 27.89% | D+43.4 | 71.71% | 25.05% | D+46.7 | D |
49 | 59.87% | 38.85% | D+21 | 61.07% | 33.94% | D+27.1 | D |
50 | 46.33% | 52.71% | R+6.4 | 46.10% | 49.78% | R+3.7 | R |
51 | 43.21% | 55.60% | R+12.4 | 37.31% | 58.51% | R+21.2 | R |
52 | 39.39% | 59.51% | R+20.1 | 36.49% | 59.05% | R+22.6 | R |
53 | 48.93% | 49.90% | R+1 | 42.52% | 53.45% | R+10.9 | R |
54 | 39.76% | 59.51% | R+19.8 | 37.01% | 60.11% | R+23.1 | R |
55 | 38.22% | 60.83% | R+22.6 | 31.47% | 66.00% | R+34.5 | R |
56 | 41.15% | 57.81% | R+16.7 | 35.36% | 61.69% | R+26.3 | R |
57 | 42.15% | 56.94% | R+14.8 | 42.01% | 54.38% | R+12.4 | R |
58 | 46.77% | 52.09% | R+5.3 | 43.06% | 53.20% | R+10.1 | R |
59 | 49.52% | 49.33% | D+0.2 | 47.68% | 48.08% | R+0.4 | R |
60 | 45.69% | 53.23% | R+7.5 | 47.16% | 48.50% | R+1.3 | R |
61 | 84.25% | 14.95% | D+69.3 | 80.00% | 16.79% | D+63.2 | D |
62 | 64.91% | 34.12% | D+30.8 | 63.03% | 33.28% | D+29.8 | D |
63 | 52.82% | 46.09% | D+6.7 | 53.22% | 42.91% | D+10.3 | R |
64 | 43.41% | 55.66% | R+12.3 | 43.51% | 52.80% | R+9.3 | R |
65 | 45.20% | 53.72% | R+8.5 | 41.15% | 55.05% | R+13.9 | R |
66 | 47.12% | 51.78% | R+4.7 | 41.07% | 55.29% | R+14.2 | R |
67 | 52.12% | 46.53% | D+5.6 | 45.78% | 49.98% | R+4.2 | R |
68 | 54.01% | 44.56% | D+9.5 | 50.98% | 44.15% | D+6.8 | D |
69 | 51.25% | 47.57% | D+3.7 | 46.57% | 49.53% | R+3 | R |
70 | 79.17% | 20.00% | D+59.2 | 73.65% | 23.39% | D+50.3 | D |
71 | 45.45% | 53.64% | R+8.2 | 42.72% | 53.89% | R+11.2 | R |
72 | 47.80% | 51.26% | R+3.5 | 46.03% | 50.71% | R+4.7 | D |
73 | 37.59% | 61.60% | R+24 | 35.82% | 61.14% | R+25.3 | R |
74 | 42.64% | 56.48% | R+13.8 | 37.10% | 60.20% | R+23.1 | R |
75 | 42.40% | 56.68% | R+14.3 | 34.70% | 62.49% | R+27.8 | R |
76 | 35.45% | 64.01% | R+28.6 | 35.24% | 61.90% | R+26.7 | R |
77 | 41.60% | 57.61% | R+16 | 36.05% | 60.86% | R+24.8 | R |
78 | 44.44% | 54.88% | R+10.4 | 42.96% | 53.85% | R+10.9 | R |
79 | 45.93% | 53.26% | R+7.3 | 39.89% | 57.01% | R+17.1 | R |
80 | 38.79% | 60.51% | R+21.7 | 36.96% | 60.49% | R+23.5 | R |
81 | 60.36% | 39.13% | D+21.2 | 59.06% | 39.12% | D+19.9 | D |
82 | 38.70% | 60.58% | R+21.9 | 36.91% | 60.22% | R+23.3 | R |
83 | 48.78% | 50.42% | R+1.6 | 43.71% | 53.43% | R+9.7 | R |
84 | 53.34% | 45.89% | D+7.5 | 47.96% | 49.59% | R+1.6 | D |
85 | 47.28% | 52.04% | R+4.8 | 44.74% | 52.71% | R+8 | R |
86 | 58.97% | 40.46% | D+18.5 | 56.40% | 41.24% | D+15.2 | D |
87 | 68.41% | 30.79% | D+37.6 | 65.09% | 32.03% | D+33.1 | D |
88 | 82.26% | 17.18% | D+65.1 | 78.19% | 19.67% | D+58.5 | D |
89 | 47.47% | 51.83% | R+4.4 | 48.96% | 48.44% | D+0.5 | R |
90 | 62.95% | 36.37% | D+26.6 | 59.38% | 38.20% | D+21.2 | D |
91 | 58.67% | 40.92% | D+17.8 | 59.17% | 39.23% | D+19.9 | D |
92 | 74.08% | 25.42% | D+48.7 | 71.50% | 26.66% | D+44.8 | D |
93 | 47.43% | 51.88% | R+4.5 | 48.32% | 49.43% | R+1.1 | R |
94 | 83.50% | 16.05% | D+67.5 | 81.01% | 17.21% | D+63.8 | D |
95 | 86.68% | 12.99% | D+73.7 | 85.09% | 13.47% | D+71.6 | D |
96 | 61.11% | 38.32% | D+22.8 | 60.59% | 37.30% | D+23.3 | D |
97 | 65.66% | 33.79% | D+31.9 | 65.26% | 32.41% | D+32.9 | D |
98 | 60.99% | 38.39% | D+22.6 | 61.02% | 36.58% | D+24.4 | D |
99 | 61.62% | 37.75% | D+23.9 | 59.47% | 38.07% | D+21.4 | D |
100 | 57.57% | 41.85% | D+15.7 | 58.15% | 39.86% | D+18.3 | D |
101 | 79.29% | 20.19% | D+59.1 | 76.54% | 21.27% | D+55.3 | D |
102 | 85.86% | 13.86% | D+72 | 83.21% | 15.08% | D+68.1 | D |
103 | 54.82% | 44.76% | D+10.1 | 58.71% | 39.21% | D+19.5 | R |
104 | 58.34% | 41.21% | D+17.1 | 62.33% | 35.40% | D+26.9 | D |
105 | 53.14% | 46.37% | D+6.8 | 56.16% | 41.22% | D+14.9 | R |
106 | 31.21% | 68.26% | R+37.1 | 33.84% | 63.71% | R+29.9 | R |
107 | 86.16% | 13.52% | D+72.6 | 83.68% | 14.67% | D+69 | D |
108 | 89.58% | 10.12% | D+79.5 | 87.11% | 11.24% | D+75.9 | D |
109 | 90.13% | 9.58% | D+80.6 | 86.38% | 12.14% | D+74.2 | D |
110 | 50.15% | 49.43% | D+0.7 | 52.71% | 45.14% | D+7.6 | R |
111 | 47.97% | 51.64% | R+3.7 | 52.16% | 45.66% | D+6.5 | R |
112 | 53.53% | 45.94% | D+7.6 | 61.62% | 35.70% | D+25.9 | D |
113 | 63.42% | 35.97% | D+27.5 | 67.40% | 30.24% | D+37.2 | D |
114 | 50.14% | 49.27% | D+0.9 | 55.75% | 41.60% | D+14.2 | D |
115 | 49.45% | 50.03% | R+0.6 | 54.08% | 43.37% | D+10.7 | R |
116 | 44.48% | 55.04% | R+10.6 | 50.91% | 46.43% | D+4.5 | R |
117 | 82.64% | 17.02% | D+65.6 | 78.36% | 19.57% | D+58.8 | D |
118 | 51.39% | 48.14% | D+3.3 | 54.87% | 42.54% | D+12.3 | D |
119 | 50.32% | 49.20% | D+1.1 | 55.15% | 42.23% | D+12.9 | R |
120 | 52.28% | 46.85% | D+5.4 | 49.21% | 47.52% | D+1.7 | R |
Total | 50.01% | 49.13% | D+0.9 | 47.82% | 49.02% | R+1.2 | - |
Source: Daily Kos |
See also
Tampa, Florida | Florida | Municipal government | Other local coverage |
---|---|---|---|
|
External links
Footnotes
- ↑ Hillsborough County Elections, "Reporting Group (Election/Committees): 2019 City of Tampa Municipal Election (3/5/2019)," accessed January 21, 2019
- ↑ Daily Kos, "Daily Kos Elections' statewide election results by congressional and legislative districts," July 9, 2013
- ↑ Daily Kos, "Daily Kos Elections' 2016 presidential results for congressional and legislative districts," February 6, 2017
|