Utility taxes in California
Ballotpedia covers all local ballot measures in California, including utility tax measures.
The majority of measures related to utility taxes are utility user taxes (UUTs). Cities and counties may impose UUTs on users' consumption of certain utility services.There were 158 cities and four counties with a utility user tax in California as of a January 2021 report by California City Finance. This accounted for 54 percent of the state's population. The report stated that the total revenues from UUTs amounted to nearly $2 billion.[1]
Under Proposition 218, which was approved in 1996, utility user taxes must be approved by voters. UUTs may be special taxes or general taxes.
Other measures related to utility taxes include utility fund transfers.
UUT taxable utilities
Utility user taxes may be applied to the following services:
- Electricity
- Gas
- Water
- Sewer
- Telephone (including cell phones and long distance services)
- Sanitation
- Cable television
Local utility tax elections (2008-2022)
The chart below depicts the number of utility tax measures on the ballot each year from 2008 to 2022.
Election results
2024
Ballot Measure | County | Jurisdiction | Outcome | Amount | Length | Purpose | Election date |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Measure LB | Los Angeles | Long Beach | Approved | November 5, 2024 | |||
Measure U | Santa Cruz | Santa Cruz | Defeated | November 5, 2024 |
2023
There were no local utility tax measures in 2023.
2022
Ballot Measure | County | Jurisdiction | Outcome | Amount | Length | Purpose | Election date |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Measure L | Humboldt | Arcata | Approved | November 8, 2022 | |||
Measure I | Riverside | Banning | Defeated | 0.015 | November 8, 2022 | ||
Measure N | Contra Costa | Hercules | Approved | 8% | General services | November 8, 2022 | |
Measure L | Santa Clara | Palo Alto | Approved | November 8, 2022 | |||
Proposition F | San Francisco | San Francisco | Approved | June 7, 2022 | |||
Measure G | Santa Clara | Santa Clara | Approved | November 8, 2022 |
2021
Ballot Measure: | County: | Outcome: | Amount:[2] | Length: | Election date |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Measure U | Fresno | November 2, 2021 | |||
Measure U | Imperial | November 2, 2021 | |||
Measure C | Riverside | November 2, 2021 |
2020
2019
No local utility tax measures were on the ballot in California in 2019
2018
There were eighteen measures related to utility taxes and fees on local California ballots in 2018. Ten measures were approved, and eight measures were defeated.
2017
Ballot Measure: | County: | Outcome: | Amount:[6] | Length: | Election date |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Measure CC: Covina Utility Tax Extension | Los Angeles | Renew 6% | 10 years | March 7, 2017 | |
Measure C: Desert Hot Springs Public Safety Utility Users Tax | Riverside | 7% | Never | November 7, 2017 | |
Measure W: Brawley Utility User Tax | Imperial | 4% | 5 years | November 7, 2017 |
2016
2015
Ballot Measure: | County: | Outcome: | Yes: | No: | Amount: | Expires: | Turnout: |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
City of Paramount Utility Users Tax Increase, Measure P (March 2015) | Los Angeles County | 75.27% | 24.73% | 2.5% increase | Never | 4.6% | |
City of Carson Utility Users Tax, Measure A (March 2015) | Los Angeles County | 47.6% | 52.4% | 2% continuation | Never | 18.7% | |
City of San Marino Utility User Tax Update and Extension, Measure U (November 2015) | Los Angeles County | 71.79% | 28.21% | Decrease to 5% | 10 years | 34.9% | |
City of Hercules Utility User Tax Continuation, Measure C (November 2015) | Contra Costa County | 72.22% | 27.78% | 2% continuation | 6 years | 22.06% |
2014
In 2014, 19 utility user tax and fee measures were decided by voters. Of the total, 13 were approved, and six were defeated.
November 4
June 3
Measure | County | Rate | Outcome |
---|---|---|---|
Davis (city of), Measure P | Yolo County | Reduce in water rates |
April 8
Measure | County | Rate | Outcome |
---|---|---|---|
Sierra Madre (city of), Measure UUT | Los Angeles County | Continue and decrease |
2013
November 5
Measure | County | Rate | Outcome |
---|---|---|---|
Portola (town of), Measure Q | San Mateo | Reduction | |
Pacifica (city of), Measure V | San Mateo | Expansion | |
Grand Terrace (city of), Measure C | San Bernardino | 5% (6 years) |
April 9
Measure | County | Outcome |
---|---|---|
City of Vernon Utility Users Tax, Measure M | Los Angeles |
March 5
Measure | County | Outcome |
---|---|---|
City of Monterey Park Utility Users Tax, Measure MP-DD | Los Angeles | |
City of Rialto Utility User Tax Extension, Measure W | San Bernardino |
2012
November 6
Ten utility tax measures were on the November 6, 2012, ballot in nine different counties.
September 18
Measure | County | Outcome |
---|---|---|
City of Vernon, Measure A | Los Angeles |
June 5
Measure | County | Outcome |
---|---|---|
Foresthill PUD, Measure C | Placer | |
Parlier, Measure S | Fresno | |
Stanton, Measure J | Orange |
April 10
Measure | County | Outcome |
---|---|---|
Bradbury, Measure A | Los Angeles | |
Sierra Madre, Measure 12-1 | Los Angeles | |
Sierra Madre, Measure 12-2 | Los Angeles |
2011
November 8
June 7
Measure | County | Outcome |
---|---|---|
Rio Vista Rollback, Measure A | Solano |
2010
November 2
June 8
- See also June 8, 2010 election in California
Measure | County | Outcome |
---|---|---|
Coachella, Measure I | Riverside | |
Mammoth Lakes, Measure U | Mono | |
Winters, Measure W | Yolo |
April 13
Measure | County | Outcome |
---|---|---|
El Segundo, Measure M | Los Angeles |
2009
November 3
June 9
Measure | County | Outcome |
---|---|---|
City of Arcadia Utility Users Tax, Measure A (June 2009) | Los Angeles |
May 19
March 3
2008
November 4
June 3
April 8
February 5
2002-2008 highlights
From June 2002 through June 2008, 83 utility user tax measures were placed before voters by cities and counties. Two of these were county measures and 81 were city measures.
- Thirty proposals were for new or increased UUTs. Six of these proposals were approved.
- Nineteen of the 30 were for an increase in the UUT tax rate. Two of these passed.
- Nineteen measures asked to increase an existing UUT past a built-in sunset period. Sixteen of these measures passed.
- Twenty-three cities proposed changes to the UUT that would allow the tax to apply to wireless telecommunications, internet, and modern billing methods. Twenty-two of these requests were approved.
- Citizens placed 14 veto referendums on the ballot seeking to repeal or alter local UUTs.
- Seven measures seeking total repeal failed.
- Four out of five measures seeking to reduce the UUT tax rate failed.
- In Greenfield, voters reduced their UUT from 6% to 3%.
- A referendum to restrict the use of UUT revenues to law enforcement services passed in Seaside (Monterey County) in November 2002.
See also
External links
Footnotes
- ↑ California City Finance, "Utility User Tax Facts," January 2021
- ↑ Note: Percents listed in this column provide the amount of the tax rather than the amount of the tax relative to the prior rate. For example, a measure to increase the total rate from 8 percent to 8.5 percent would be described as a "0.5% increase."
- ↑ Note: Percents listed in this column provide the amount of the tax rather than the amount of the tax relative to the prior rate. For example, a measure to increase the total rate from 8 percent to 8.5 percent would be described as a "0.5% increase."
- ↑ Note: Percents listed in this column provide the amount of the tax rather than the amount of the tax relative to the prior rate. For example, a measure to increase the total rate from 8 percent to 8.5 percent would be described as a "0.5% increase."
- ↑ Note: Percents listed in this column provide the amount of the tax rather than the amount of the tax relative to the prior rate. For example, a measure to increase the total rate from 8 percent to 8.5 percent would be described as a "0.5% increase."
- ↑ Note: Percents listed in this column provide the amount of the tax rather than the amount of the tax relative to the prior rate. For example, a measure to increase the total rate from 8 percent to 8.5 percent would be described as a "0.5% increase."
- ↑ Note: Percents listed in this column provide the amount of the tax rather than the amount of the tax relative to the prior rate. For example, a measure to increase the total rate from 8 percent to 8.5 percent would be described as a "0.5% increase."
- ↑ Note: Phased in with an increase by 3 percentage points in 2017 and 3 more in 2018.
|