Arizona Reduce Number of Income Tax Brackets to Flat Rate of 2.50% Referendum (2022)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Arizona Reduce Number of Income Tax Brackets to Flat Rate of 2.50% Referendum
Flag of Arizona.png
Election date
November 8, 2022
Topic
Taxes
Status
Not on the ballot
Type
Referendum
Origin
Citizens

The Arizona Reduce Number of Income Tax Brackets to Flat Rate of 2.50% Referendum was not on the ballot in Arizona as a veto referendum on November 8, 2022.

A "yes" vote would have been to uphold SB 1828, which would: 

* reduce the state's income tax from four brackets (ranging from 2.59% to 4.50%) to two brackets (2.55% and 2.98%) and

* further reduce the tax brackets to a flat rate of 2.50% when state revenue exceeds $12.976 billion.

A "no" vote would have been to repeal SB 1828, thus maintaining the state's income tax as four brackets (ranging from 2.59% to 4.50%).


Overview

What did the veto referendum seek to repeal?

The veto referendum was designed to repeal Sections 13 and 15 of Senate Bill 1828 (SB 1828).

Together, Sections 13 and 15 reduced the state's income tax brackets from four to two and further reduce the tax brackets to a flat rate when state revenue exceeds $12.976 billion ($12,976,300,000).[1]

Under SB 1828, the state's four tax brackets were reduced to two on December 31, 2021. The tax rates would be, for a single filer, 2.55% on income of $27,272 or less and $695, plus 2.98%, on income above $27,272. The two tax brackets would be reduced to a flat rate of 2.5% when state revenue exceeds $12.976 billion.[1]

As of 2021, the highest income tax rate in Arizona was 4.50% on income above $159,000 (single filing) or $318,000 (joint filing).

A "yes" vote on a veto referendum in Arizona was to uphold the legislation. A "no" vote was to repeal the legislation.

Who was behind the veto referendum?

Invest in Arizona was leading the campaign for the veto referendum (a "no" vote on the legislation). The ballot measure committee was known as Invest in Education in 2020 and supported Proposition 208, which voters approved. Proposition 208 was designed to enact a 3.50% income tax surcharge and allocate the revenue to education and teacher-related programs. Senate Bill 1828, Sections 13 and 15, would not make a direct change to the income tax surcharge. Invest in Arizona collected signatures for a second veto referendum related to revenue generation from Proposition 208, but not enough signatures were found valid. David Lujan, CEO of the Children's Action Alliance, said the tax changes "are attempting to give huge tax cuts to the rich, which is just disastrous for our future."[2] State Sen. J.D. Mesnard (R-17) responded to the referendum, saying, "[a]ll we’ve done … is make sure that we are not going to drive taxpayers out of the state and actually create a situation where you have less revenue going to our education system because less people are living here."[3]

Text of measure

Full text

The full text of the ballot measure is below:

Support for a "No" vote

Invest in Arizona was leading the campaign in support of a "no" vote on the veto referendum. The campaign sponsored the veto referendum.[4] Invest in Arizona was called Invest in Education in 2020 and supported Proposition 208, which voters approved.[5]

Supporters

Organizations

  • Arizona Education Association
  • Stand for Children, Inc.


Arguments

  • Rebecca Gau, executive director of Stand for Children Arizona: "By passing these sneaky budget schemes, this small group of politicians is helping their rich friends avoid paying their fair share to public schools. Worst of all, they are trying to silence voters."


Campaign finance

See also: Campaign finance requirements for Arizona ballot measures
The campaign finance information on this page reflects the most recent scheduled reports that Ballotpedia has processed, which covered through March 31, 2022. The deadline for the next scheduled reports was July 15, 2022.


One PAC, Invest in Arizona, was registered to support a "No" vote on the veto referendum. The PAC raised $5.29 million, including $2.45 million from Stand for Children, Inc. and $2.38 million from the National Education Association .[5]

Ballotpedia had not identified committees registered to support a "Yes" vote on the veto referendum.[6]

   .sbtotaltable {
   width: 50%;
   }
   .sbtotaltable th {
    font-size:1.2em;
   }
   .sbtotaltable td {
       text-align:center;
      }
   .sbtotalheader {
       background-color: black !important;
       color:white !important;
       font-size:1.0em;
       font-weight:bold;
   }
   .sbtotaltotal {
       font-weight:bold;
   }
   

    
Cash Contributions In-Kind Contributions Total Contributions Cash Expenditures Total Expenditures
Support $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Oppose $5,021,471.80 $267,728.13 $5,289,199.93 $4,998,429.42 $5,266,157.55

Support for "No" vote

The following table includes contribution and expenditure totals for the committee that supported a "No" vote of the veto referendum.[6]

   .sbtotaltable {
   width: 50%;
   }
   .sbtotaltable th {
    font-size:1.2em;
   }
   .sbtotaltable td {
       text-align:center;
      }
   .sbtotalheader {
       background-color: black !important;
       color:white !important;
       font-size:1.0em;
       font-weight:bold;
   }
   .sbtotaltotal {
       font-weight:bold;
   }
   

    
Committees in support of Arizona Reduce Number of Income Tax Brackets to Flat Rate of 2.50% Referendum (2022)
Committee Cash Contributions In-Kind Contributions Total Contributions Cash Expenditures Total Expenditures
Invest in Arizona $5,021,471.80 $267,728.13 $5,289,199.93 $4,998,429.42 $5,266,157.55
Total $5,021,471.80 $267,728.13 $5,289,199.93 $4,998,429.42 $5,266,157.55

Donors

The following were the top five donors to the committee.[6]

Donor Cash Contributions In-Kind Contributions Total Contributions
Stand for Children, Inc. $2,316,006.00 $138,614.97 $2,454,620.97
National Education Association $2,378,221.00 $0.00 $2,378,221.00
Arizona Education Association $154,920.00 $0.00 $154,920.00
Arizona Interfaith Network $63,500.00 $0.00 $63,500.00
Children's Action Alliance $2,000.00 $0.00 $2,000.00

Background

Arizona Proposition 208

See also: Arizona Proposition 208, Tax on Incomes Exceeding $250,000 for Teacher Salaries and Schools Initiative (2020)

In 2020, voters approved Proposition 208, which was designed to enact a 3.50% income tax, in addition to the existing income tax (4.50% in 2020), on income above $250,000 (single filing) or $500,000 (joint filing). Proposition 208 required revenue from the 3.50% income tax to go toward to teacher and classroom support staff salaries, teacher mentoring and retention programs, career and technical education programs, and the Arizona Teachers Academy.[7]

Invest in Education led the campaign in support of Proposition 208. Amber Gould, a high school teacher and state director of the National Education Association, was chairperson of Invest in Education. The campaign received $22.9 million. Stand for Children, Inc., a 501(c)(4) nonprofit that focuses on education policies, provided $9.8 million to Invest in Education. The National Education Association, a 501(c)(5) teachers’ organization, contributed $7.8 million.

Arizonans for Great Schools and a Strong Economy led the campaign against Proposition 208. Jaime Molera, a former Arizona Superintendent of Public Instruction, was chairperson of the campaign. The Arizona Chamber of Commerce and Industry organized the campaign committee.[8] The campaign, along with the No on 208 PAC, received $8.3 million, including $640,000 from SAC Holding Corp. and $350,000 from the Arizona Chamber of Commerce.

Senate Bill 1828

Senate Bill 1828 (SB 1828) was an omnibus taxation bill introduced on May 24, 2021. The Arizona State Senate voted 16-14 to pass the legislation. The Arizona House of Representatives voted 31-29 to pass SB 1828. Legislative Republicans were unanimous in their support of the bill, and legislative Democrats were unanimous in their opposition to the bill. Gov. Doug Ducey (R) signed SB 1828 on June 30, 2021.[9]

Breakdown of Senate votes on SB 1828
Party Affiliation Yes No Abstain Total
Democrat 0 14 0 14
Republican 16 0 0 16
Total 16 14 0 30

Breakdown of House votes on SB 1828
Party Affiliation Yes No Abstain Total
Democrat 0 29 0 29
Republican 31 0 0 31
Total 31 29 0 50

2021 income tax structure

As of 2021, Arizona had four tax brackets for the personal income tax. The following is an outline of the tax brackets for single filers and joint (married) filers:[10]

Personal income tax rates in Arizona, 2021 rates
Individual Joint
Amount Tax Amount Tax
$0 - $26,500 2.59% $0 - $53,000 2.59%
$26,501 - $53,000 3.34% $53,001 - $106,000 3.34%
$53,001 - $159,000 4.17% $106,001 - $318,000 4.17%
$159,001 and over 4.50% $318,001 and over 4.50%

Path to the ballot

Process in Arizona

See also: Laws governing the initiative process in Arizona

In Arizona, the number of signatures required to qualify a veto referendum for the ballot is equal to 5 percent of votes cast for governor in the most recent gubernatorial election. Signatures for veto referendums are due 90 days following the adjournment of the legislative session at which the targeted bill was approved.

The requirements to get veto referendums certified for the 2022 ballot:

If the secretary of state certifies that enough valid signatures were submitted, the veto referendum goes on the next general election ballot.

Stages of this veto referendum

The campaign Invest in Arizona filed the veto referendum on July 2, 2021. Signatures were due on September 28, 2021.[11] Invest in Arizona reported filing more than 215,000 signatures.[12]

On November 19, 2021, the office of Secretary of State Katie Hobbs announced that enough signatures were valid for the veto referendum to appear on the ballot in 2022.[13]

Arizona Free Enterprise Club v. Hobbs

  
Lawsuit overview
Issue: Whether the Arizona Constitution prohibited veto referendums against bills that provide for support and maintenance of the state government.
Court: Arizona Supreme Court
Ruling: Arizona Supreme Court found that sections 13 and 15 of SB1828 do fall into the support and maintenance exception of the Arizona Constitution, therefore, the issue cannot be put before voters on the ballot.
Plaintiff(s): Arizona Free Enterprise Club, et al.Defendant(s): Katie Hobbs, et al.
Plaintiff argument:
The Arizona Constitution does not allow for referendum of legislative actions “for the support and maintenance of the departments of state government and state institutions.”
Defendant argument:
The veto referendum will leave the state with additional funds, and does not appropriate money. Therefore, the referendum can be subject to voters.

  Source: [1]

The Arizona Free Enterprise Club challenged the veto referendum as unconstitutional in the Maricopa County Superior Court on July 21, 2021.[14] The Arizona Free Enterprise Club argued that the Arizona Constitution prohibited veto referendums against bills that provide for support and maintenance of state government and that tax bills fall under this umbrella. Lawyers for the initiative campaign argued that tax decreases do not provide for support and maintenance of state government and therefore can be referred to voters through the veto referendum process.[15]

On December 22, 2021, Maricopa Superior Court Judge Katherine Cooper ruled against the Arizona Free Enterprise Club, stating that the veto referendum was constitutional. She said that because the veto referendum would leave the state with additional funds, rather than less, the measure would not hinder the support and maintenance of state government.[16]

On April 21, 2022, the Arizona Supreme Court ruled that voters cannot determine the flat tax proposal through a referendum, reversing the order of Judge Cooper.[17] The court ruled that sections 13 and 15 of SB1828 fall into the support and maintenance exception of the Arizona Constitution. As a result, the referendum was taken off the ballot, and SB1828 was slated to go into effect in January 2025.

The Supreme Court released the full opinion on August 20, finding that referendums cannot repeal tax decreases or increases, except in cases when a tax would fund a new government department. Judge John Lopez IV wrote, "A revenue measure is exempt from referendum, regardless of the increase or decrease in revenue, provided it is for the support and maintenance of existing departments of the state government and state institutions." Justices Bill Montgomery and James Beene dissented.[18]

How to cast a vote

See also: Voting in Arizona

Click "Show" to learn more about voter registration, identification requirements, and poll times in Arizona.

See also

Footnotes

  1. 1.0 1.1 Arizona Secretary of State, "R-03-2021," July 2, 2021
  2. AZCentral.com, "Arizona groups that backed Proposition 208 seek to block tax cuts signed by Gov. Ducey," July 2, 2021
  3. AZMirror, "Invest in Arizona campaign to overturn tax cuts with voter referendums not dampened by lawsuit," July 25, 2021
  4. Invest in Arizona, "Homepage," accessed October 3, 2021
  5. 5.0 5.1 Arizona Secretary of State, "See the Money," accessed October 3, 2021
  6. 6.0 6.1 6.2 Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named finance
  7. Arizona Secretary of State, "Initiative 31-2020," February 14, 2020
  8. Arizona Chamber of Commerce and Industry, "Arizona Chamber of Commerce and Industry files committee to oppose income tax hike on small businesses," May 9, 2018
  9. Arizona State Legislature, "SB 1828," accessed October 3, 2021
  10. Arizona Department of Revenue, "Updated Guidance for Arizona Individual Income Taxpayers," accessed July 6, 2020
  11. Arizona Secretary of State, "Initiative, Referendum and Recall Applications," accessed July 2, 2021
  12. KTAR, "Public education advocates who oppose massive Arizona tax cuts file to block them," September 28, 2021
  13. U.S. News, "Arizona Certifies Referendum Seeking to Repeal Big Tax Cuts," November 19, 2021
  14. Maricopa County Superior Court, "Arizona Free Enterprise Club v. Hobbs,"July 21, 2021
  15. Arizona Public Media, "State judge will decide if voters can repeal new 'flat tax'," November 5, 2021
  16. Tucson.com, "Judge: Arizonans have right to vote on Legislature's $1.9 billion tax cut plan," December 22, 2021
  17. ArizonaDailyIndependent.com, "New Flat Rate Income Tax Structure Is Upheld By Arizona Supreme Court," April 22, 2022
  18. AZ Family, "Arizona Supreme Court says voters can’t repeal tax cuts," August 20, 2022
  19. Arizona Revised Statutes, "Title 16, Section 565," accessed July 18, 2024
  20. Arizona generally observes Mountain Standard Time; however, the Navajo Nation observes daylight saving time. Because of this, Mountain Daylight Time is sometimes observed in Arizona.
  21. 21.0 21.1 21.2 Arizona Secretary of State, "Voters," accessed July 18, 2024
  22. Arizona Secretary of State, "Arizona Voter Registration Instructions," accessed July 18, 2024
  23. Supreme Court of the United States, "No. 24A164," accessed August 22, 2024
  24. The Washington Post, "Supreme Court allows Arizona voter-registration law requiring proof of citizenship," August 22, 2024
  25. Bloomberg Law, "Supreme Court Partly Restores Voter Proof-of-Citizenship Law ," August 22, 2024
  26. Reuters, "US Supreme Court partly revives Arizona's proof of citizenship voter law," August 22, 2024
  27. Under federal law, the national mail voter registration application (a version of which is in use in all states with voter registration systems) requires applicants to indicate that they are U.S. citizens in order to complete an application to vote in state or federal elections, but does not require voters to provide documentary proof of citizenship. According to the U.S. Department of Justice, the application "may require only the minimum amount of information necessary to prevent duplicate voter registrations and permit State officials both to determine the eligibility of the applicant to vote and to administer the voting process."
  28. ArizonaElections.gov, "What ID Do I Need to Vote Quiz," accessed March 14, 2023
  29. Arizona State Legislature, “Arizona Revised Statutes 16-579,” accessed July 19, 2024