Arizona Proposition 308, In-State Tuition for Non-Citizen Residents Measure (2022)
Arizona Proposition 308 | |
---|---|
![]() | |
Election date November 8, 2022 | |
Topic Education and Immigration | |
Status![]() | |
Type State statute | Origin State legislature |
Arizona Proposition 308, the In-State Tuition for Non-Citizen Residents Measure, was on the ballot in Arizona as a legislatively referred state statute on November 8, 2022. The measure was approved.
A "yes" vote supported allowing non-citizen students to receive in-state college tuition when a student (a) attended school in Arizona for at least two years and (b) graduated from a public school, private school, or homeschool in Arizona. |
A "no" vote opposed allowing non-citizen students to receive in-state college tuition, thus continuing to require out-of-state tuition rates for non-citizen students who attended for at least two years and graduated from schools in Arizona. |
Election results
Arizona Proposition 308 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Result | Votes | Percentage | ||
1,250,320 | 51.24% | |||
No | 1,189,877 | 48.76% |
Overview
What did this ballot measure change?
- See also: Text of measure
Proposition 308 was designed to allow non-citizen students, except those considered to be nonresident aliens under federal law, to receive in-state college tuition when a student (a) attended school in Arizona for at least two years and (b) graduated from a public school, private school, or homeschool in Arizona.[1] Examples of nonresident aliens, as found in U.S. Code Title 8, are the families of foreign ambassadors, diplomats, and employees and non-citizens with residencies in a foreign nation that the non-citizen has no intention of abandoning.[2]
Proposition 308 repealed provisions of Proposition 300, which voters approved in 2006. Proposition 300 provided that non-citizens could not receive certain state-subsidized services, benefits, or financial aid or in-state tuition rates.[3]
How did the legislature refer this ballot measure?
- See also: Path to the ballot
In Arizona, a successful ballot measure cannot be repealed by the state Legislature without voter approval. To repeal provisions of Proposition 300 (2006), the legislature needed to submit a new ballot measure to voters.
State Sen. Paul Boyer (R-20) introduced the ballot measure into the Arizona State Legislature in 2021. On March 4, 2021, the Arizona State Senate voted 17-13 to pass the proposal. Senate Democrats and three Republicans supported putting the measure on the ballot. The remaining 13 Republicans opposed the measure. The Arizona House of Representatives voted 33-27 to approve the measure for the ballot on May 10, 2021. House Democrats, along with four Republicans, supported putting the measure on the ballot. The remaining 27 Republicans opposed the measure.
Text of measure
Ballot title
The official ballot title was as follows:[1]
“ |
Amending sections 1-502 and 15-1803, Arizona revised statutes; repealing section 15-1825, Arizona revised statutes; relating to the classification of students for tuition purposes. Descriptive Title The law would allow Arizona students, regardless of immigration status, to be eligible for financial aid at state universities and community colleges and in-state tuition if they graduated from and attended a public or private high school, or home school equivalent, for two years in Arizona. [4] |
” |
Ballot summary
The official ballot summary was as follows:[1]
“ | A “YES” vote shall have the effect of allowing any Arizona student, regardless of immigration status, to be eligible for in-state tuition at state universities and community colleges if they graduated from, and spent at least two years attending, an Arizona public or private high school, or homeschool equivalent; allowing any Arizona student, regardless of immigration status, to be eligible for state financial aid at state universities and community colleges.
A “NO” vote shall have the effect of retaining the current law on university and community college tuition.[4] |
” |
Full text
The full text of the ballot measure is below:
Readability score
- See also: Ballot measure readability scores, 2022
Using the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL) and Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) formulas, Ballotpedia scored the readability of the ballot title and summary for this measure. Readability scores are designed to indicate the reading difficulty of text. The Flesch-Kincaid formulas account for the number of words, syllables, and sentences in a text; they do not account for the difficulty of the ideas in the text. The state legislature wrote the ballot language for this measure.
The FKGL for the ballot title is grade level 13, and the FRE is 24. The word count for the ballot title is 88.
The FKGL for the ballot summary is grade level 19, and the FRE is 14. The word count for the ballot summary is 89.
Support
Yes on 308 was the campaign in support of the measure.
Supporters
Officials
- State Rep. Cesar Chavez (D)
- State Rep. David Cook (R)
- House Minority Leader Charlene Fernandez (D)
- State Rep. Jennifer Jermaine (D)
- State Rep. Joel John (R)
- State Rep. Raquel Terán (D)
- State Rep. Michelle Udall (R)
- Superintendent of Public Instruction Kathy Hoffman (D)
Political Parties
Organizations
- American Civil Liberties Union
- Civic Engagement Beyond Voting
- Greater Phoenix Leadership
Arguments
Opposition
Opponents
Officials
- State Rep. Leo Biasiucci (R)
- State Rep. Joseph Chaplik (R)
- State Rep. John Fillmore (R)
Political Parties
Arguments
Campaign finance
Yes on 308 was the campaign registered in support of the measure. They raised $2.23 million in contributions and spent $2.23 million.[5]
.sbtotaltable { width: 50%; } .sbtotaltable th { font-size:1.2em; } .sbtotaltable td { text-align:center; } .sbtotalheader { background-color: black !important; color:white !important; font-size:1.0em; font-weight:bold; } .sbtotaltotal { font-weight:bold; }
Cash Contributions | In-Kind Contributions | Total Contributions | Cash Expenditures | Total Expenditures | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Support | $1,933,086.84 | $300,000.00 | $2,233,086.84 | $1,932,803.08 | $2,232,803.08 |
Oppose | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
Total | $1,933,086.84 | $300,000.00 | $2,233,086.84 | $1,932,803.08 | $2,232,803.08 |
Support
The following table includes contribution and expenditure totals for the committees in support of the measure.
.sbtotaltable { width: 50%; } .sbtotaltable th { font-size:1.2em; } .sbtotaltable td { text-align:center; } .sbtotalheader { background-color: black !important; color:white !important; font-size:1.0em; font-weight:bold; } .sbtotaltotal { font-weight:bold; }
Committees in support of Proposition 308 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Committee | Cash Contributions | In-Kind Contributions | Total Contributions | Cash Expenditures | Total Expenditures |
Yes on 308 | $1,933,086.84 | $300,000.00 | $2,233,086.84 | $1,932,803.08 | $2,232,803.08 |
Total | $1,933,086.84 | $300,000.00 | $2,233,086.84 | $1,932,803.08 | $2,232,803.08 |
Donors
The following were the top donors who contributed to the support committees.[5]
Donor | Cash Contributions | In-Kind Contributions | Total Contributions |
---|---|---|---|
American Business Immigration Coalition Action | $230,000.00 | $777,042.35 | $1,007,042.35 |
Chicanos Por la Causa | $1,000,000.00 | $0.00 | $1,000,000.00 |
Cheryl Najaf | $100,000.00 | $0.00 | $100,000.00 |
American Civil Liberties Union, Inc. | $50,000.00 | $876.00 | $50,876.00 |
DFX LLC | $50,000.00 | $0.00 | $50,000.00 |
GPL Committee for Arizona Leadership | $50,000.00 | $0.00 | $50,000.00 |
James Murphy | $50,000.00 | $0.00 | $50,000.00 |
Opposition
Ballotpedia did not identify ballot measure committees registered to oppose the ballot measure.[5]
Methodology
To read Ballotpedia's methodology for covering ballot measure campaign finance information, click here.
Media editorials
- See also: 2022 ballot measure media endorsements
Support
The following media editorial boards published an editorial supporting the ballot measure:
Opposition
You can share campaign information or arguments, along with source links for this information, at [email protected]
Background
Proposition 300
In 2006, the Arizona State Legislature referred Proposition 300 to the general election ballot. Proposition 300 was designed to prohibit non-citizens and people without legal residential status from receiving in-state college tuition, education financial aid, or state-subsidized childcare assistance. The ballot measure received 71.4% of the vote.
In-state university tuition for non-citizen residents by state
As of March 2021, 17 states and D.C. had passed legislation to offer in-state tuition to certain non-citizen residents and seven state university systems authorized in-state tuition for certain non-citizen residents.[6]
Path to the ballot
- See also: Legislatively referred state statute
In Arizona, a successful ballot measure cannot be repealed by the state Legislature without voter approval. To repeal provisions of Proposition 300 (2006), the legislature needed to submit a new ballot measure to voters. A referred statute requires a simple majority vote in each chamber of the Arizona State Legislature during one legislative session.
State Sen. Paul Boyer (R-20) filed the ballot measure as Senate Concurrent Resolution 1044. On March 4, 2021, the Arizona State Senate voted 17-13 to pass SCR 1044. Senate Democrats and three Republicans supported the resolution. The remaining 13 Republicans opposed the bill.[1]
The Arizona House of Representatives voted 33-27 to approve SCR 1044 on May 10, 2021. House Democrats, along with four Republicans, supported the resolution. The remaining 27 Republicans opposed the resolution.[1]
With approval in the Senate and House, the proposal was referred to the ballot for November 8, 2022.
|
|
How to cast a vote
- See also: Voting in Arizona
Click "Show" to learn more about voter registration, identification requirements, and poll times in Arizona.
How to cast a vote in Arizona | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Poll timesIn Arizona, all polling places are open from 6:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. local time. An individual who is in line at the time polls close must be allowed to vote.[7][8] Registration
To vote in Arizona, one must be a citizen of the United States and a resident of an Arizona county. A voter must be 18 years or older on or before Election Day.[9] To be eligible to vote in an election one must register at least 29 days prior to the election. Individuals can register online, in person at the county recorder's office, or by mail.[10] Automatic registrationArizona does not practice automatic voter registration. Online registration
Arizona has implemented an online voter registration system. Residents can register to vote by visiting this website. Same-day registrationArizona does not allow same-day voter registration. Residency requirementsArizona law requires 29 days of residency in the state before a person may vote. Verification of citizenshipArizona requires voters to submit proof of citizenship with their voter registration application to vote in state and local elections. According to the Arizona Secretary of State's website: "A registrant who attests to being a citizen but fails to provide proof of citizenship and whose citizenship is not otherwise verified will be eligible to vote only in federal elections (known as being a 'federal only' voter)."[9] Accepted proof of citizenship include:[9]
On August 22, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court issued an emergency order partially granting the Republican National Committee and Arizona Republicans' request to enforce a 2022 law related to proof of citizenship requirements. The court allowed the enforcement of the provision requiring the state to reject state voter registration forms submitted without proof of citizenship. Previously, a person who submitted a state voter registration form without proof of citizenship could still be a federal only voter. After the court's ruling, a person unable to provide proof of citizenship would need to submit a federal voter registration form in order to vote in federal elections.[11][12][13][14] All 49 states with voter registration systems require applicants to declare that they are U.S. citizens in order to register to vote in state and federal elections, under penalty of perjury or other punishment.[15] As of January 2025, six states — Alabama, Arizona, Georgia, Kansas, Louisiana, and New Hampshire — had passed laws requiring verification of citizenship at the time of voter registration. However, only two of those states' laws were in effect, in Arizona and New Hampshire. In three states — California, Maryland, and Vermont — at least one local jurisdiction allowed noncitizens to vote in some local elections as of November 2024. Noncitizens registering to vote in those elections must complete a voter registration application provided by the local jurisdiction and are not eligible to register as state or federal voters. Verifying your registrationThe Arizona Voter Information Portal, run by the Arizona Secretary of State's office, allows residents to check their voter registration status online. Voter ID requirementsArizona requires voters to present photo identification or two forms of non-photo identification while voting.[16][17] The following were accepted forms of identification as of July 2024: Click here for the Arizona Citizens Clean Elections Commission's page on accepted ID to ensure you have the most current information. Voters can present one of the following forms of ID that contain the voter’s photograph, name, and address:
If a voter does not have one of the above forms of ID, the voter can present two of the following forms of ID that contain the voter’s name and address:
Additionally, if a voter presents photo ID that does not list an address within the precinct in which he or she wants to cast a vote, that person may present the photo ID with one non-photo identification material from the second list above. The identification material should include the voter’s address. |
See also
External links
Footnotes
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 Arizona State Legislature, "Senate Concurrent Resolution 1044," accessed March 8, 2021
- ↑ U.S. Code, "Title 8," accessed May 10, 2021
- ↑ Arizona Secretary of State, "2006 Ballot Propositions & Judicial Performance Review," accessed May 10, 2021
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
- ↑ 5.0 5.1 5.2 Arizona Secretary of State, "Campaign Finance," accessed Oct 17, 2022
- ↑ NCSL, "Tuition Benefits for Immigrants," March 1, 2021
- ↑ Arizona Revised Statutes, "Title 16, Section 565," accessed July 18, 2024
- ↑ Arizona generally observes Mountain Standard Time; however, the Navajo Nation observes daylight saving time. Because of this, Mountain Daylight Time is sometimes observed in Arizona.
- ↑ 9.0 9.1 9.2 Arizona Secretary of State, "Voters," accessed July 18, 2024
- ↑ Arizona Secretary of State, "Arizona Voter Registration Instructions," accessed July 18, 2024
- ↑ Supreme Court of the United States, "No. 24A164," accessed August 22, 2024
- ↑ The Washington Post, "Supreme Court allows Arizona voter-registration law requiring proof of citizenship," August 22, 2024
- ↑ Bloomberg Law, "Supreme Court Partly Restores Voter Proof-of-Citizenship Law ," August 22, 2024
- ↑ Reuters, "US Supreme Court partly revives Arizona's proof of citizenship voter law," August 22, 2024
- ↑ Under federal law, the national mail voter registration application (a version of which is in use in all states with voter registration systems) requires applicants to indicate that they are U.S. citizens in order to complete an application to vote in state or federal elections, but does not require voters to provide documentary proof of citizenship. According to the U.S. Department of Justice, the application "may require only the minimum amount of information necessary to prevent duplicate voter registrations and permit State officials both to determine the eligibility of the applicant to vote and to administer the voting process."
- ↑ ArizonaElections.gov, "What ID Do I Need to Vote Quiz," accessed March 14, 2023
- ↑ Arizona State Legislature, “Arizona Revised Statutes 16-579,” accessed July 19, 2024