URL Fragment and 302 redirects
It's well known that the URL fragment (the part after the #) is not sent to the server. I do wonder though how fragments work when a server redirect (via HTTP status 302 and Location: header) is involved. My question is really two-fold: If the original URL had a fragment (/original.php#foo), and a redirect is made to /new.php, does the fragment part of the original URL simply get lost? Or does it
QUERY_STRING ä¸ã®ãƒ‘ラメータã®åŒºåˆ‡ã‚Šã¯å¿…ãšã—ã‚‚ '&' ã§ã¯ãªã„ - ç†ç³»å¦ç”Ÿæ—¥è¨˜
cricket ã¨ã¯ SNMP を使ã£ã¦æ§˜ã€…ãªæ©Ÿå™¨ã‹ã‚‰æƒ…å ±ã‚’å–å¾—ã—，CGI ã§ã‚°ãƒ©ãƒ•ã¾ã§ä½œæˆã™ã‚‹ã¨ã„ã†ä»£ç‰©ã§ã™ï¼Ž Cricket Home ã¼ãã¯ãã® CGI ã‚’æ„›ã§ã¦ã¯æºœæ¯ã‚’ã¤ã，ã¿ãŸã„ãªæ†‚ã„ã®ã‚ã‚‹åˆå¾Œã‚’éŽã”ã—ã¦ãŸã‚“ã§ã™ã‘ã©ï¼Œã©ã†ã‚‚ CGI ã«æ¸¡ã™ãƒ‘ラメータãŒã‚»ãƒŸã‚³ãƒãƒ³ (';') ã§åŒºåˆ‡ã‚‰ã‚Œã¦ã„る． ã‚ーã‚，独自使用ã‹ã‚ˆå«Œã«ãªã‚‹ã‚ˆãªãƒ¼ï¼Œæ„味ã‚ã‹ã‚“ãªã„ã¨ã“ã‚ã“ã ã‚ã‚‹ãªã‚ˆãªãƒ¼ã¨ã‹æ€ã£ã¦ãŸã¨ã“ã‚，CGI.pm ã®ã‚½ãƒ¼ã‚¹ã‚’ãµã¨è¦‹ã‚‹ã¨ï¼Œãªã‚“ã‹ã•ï¼Œã°ã£ã¡ã—セミコãƒãƒ³ã«ã‚‚対応ã—ã¦ã‚“ã ã‘ã©!!!! sub parse_params { my($self,$tosplit) = @_; my(@pairs) = split(/[&;]/,$tosplit); ã“ã‚Œãªã‚“ã§! 独自仕様ã˜ã‚ƒãªã‹ã£ãŸã‚“ã‚„!! RFC 見ã¦ã‚‚別ã«ãã‚“ãªã®æ›¸ã„ã¦ãªã„ã£ã½ã„ã—ãªãƒ¼ï¼Œã“ã‚Œã©ã“ã§æ±ºã¾ã£ã¦ã‚“ã ã‚ã†ã¨ã‹æ€ã£ã¦ Web ã‚’æ¼ã£
UUID 㨠Perl ã«ã¤ã„㦠- daily dayflower
UUID ãŒã©ã†ã„ã†ã‚‚ã®ã§ã‚ã‚‹ã‹ï¼Œã¨ã‹ UUID ã®è¡¨ç¾å½¢ã«ã¤ã„ã¦ã¯çœç•¥ã—ã¾ã™ã€‚ UUID - Wikipedia ãŒå‚考ã«ãªã‚‹ã‹ã¨ã€‚ UUID ã®ä»•æ§˜ã¨ã—㦠RFC 4122 ã‚’å‚ç…§ã—ã¾ã—ãŸ*1。ãªã®ã§ã‚ˆã‚Šç´°ã‹ã„ã“ã¨ã«ã¤ã„ã¦ã¯åŽŸæ–‡ã‚’å‚ç…§ã—ã¦ãã ã•ã„。ç–定ã•ã‚Œã‚‹ã¾ã§ã«ã„ã‚ã„ã‚経緯ãŒã‚ã‚‹ã®ã§ã™ãŒï¼Œãã®ã¸ã‚“㯠http://www.rfcnews.jp/archives/2005/07/rfc_4122uuidurn.html ã«è²ã‚Šã¾ã™ã€‚ UUID ã®æ§‹é€ UUID ã®å†…éƒ¨æ§‹é€ ã‚’ãŠãŠã¾ã‹ã«è¡¨ã™ã¨ä»¥ä¸‹ã®ã‚ˆã†ã«ãªã‚Šã¾ã™ã€‚ variant 2 bit (3 bit) version 4 bit time 60 bit clock_seq 14 bit (13 bit) node 48 bit 実際ã«ã¯ variant フィールド㯠clock_seq フィールドã®ã‚ªã‚¯ãƒ†ãƒƒãƒˆã®ä¸ã«åŸ‹ã‚è¾¼ã¾ã‚Œã¦ã„ã¾ã™
1
リリースã€éšœå®³æƒ…å ±ãªã©ã®ã‚µãƒ¼ãƒ“スã®ãŠçŸ¥ã‚‰ã›
最新ã®äººæ°—エントリーã®é…ä¿¡
j次ã®ãƒ–ックマーク
kå‰ã®ãƒ–ックマーク
lã‚ã¨ã§èªã‚€
eコメント一覧を開ã
oページを開ã
{{#tags}}- {{label}}
{{/tags}}