Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

different formats for rural/non-rural #4

Open
freyfogle opened this issue Oct 7, 2014 · 3 comments
Open

different formats for rural/non-rural #4

freyfogle opened this issue Oct 7, 2014 · 3 comments
Labels
enhancement

Comments

@freyfogle
Copy link
Member

Am coming acorss countries where in larger cities it seems just the city is used, but in rura areas town and province (or equiv) is used.
@StephanGeorg
Copy link
Contributor

...like in italy.

@freyfogle
Copy link
Member Author

yes, do you have any test cases we could start trying to work with? Unfortunately I don't see a simple solution here as all we have to work with is the input components, not real geographic information. All ideas or approaches welcome.

@StephanGeorg
Copy link
Contributor

Honestly no. I'm processing a lot of italian data but can't find regularity when to use "province code" or not.

According to the official docs I would say {{state_district}} should be used by default.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@freyfogle @StephanGeorg