Copy & Pest - A case-study on the clipboard, blind trust and invisible cross-application XSS

Copy & Pest
A case-study on the clipboard, blind trust and invisible
cross-application XSS
A talk by Mario Heiderich
mario@cure53.de || @0x6D6172696F

Don't accept any documents from this man
● Dr.-Ing. Mario Heiderich
● Researcher and Post-Doc, Ruhr-Uni Bochum
– PhD Thesis about Client Side Security and Defense
● Founder of Cure53
– Pentest- & Security-Firm located in Berlin
– Consulting, Workshops, Trainings
– „Simply the Best Company in the World“
● Published Author and Speaker
– Specialized on HTML5, DOM and SVG Security
– JavaScript, XSS and Client Side Attacks
● HTML5 Security Cheatsheet
● And DOMPurify!
– @0x6D6172696F
– mario@cure53.de

So, this happened several months ago,
Mr. Derp opens Gmail and writes a message.
(you, fellow attendees will see the live demo,
for everyone else we have screenshots)

Technical Background
● There's some things we need to talk about
– and will in a few minutes
● What did just happen here?
● Why did it happen?
● How else can this happen?
● What can we do against it?
● Who should actually fix it?
● Now let's get to it, shall we

What did just happen here?
● We have seen an attack
that abuses a copy&paste
interaction
● We copied from a seemingly
harmless document, here
LibreOffice
● We then pasted into the
browser, here the
Gmail compose window
● And all of a sudden, HTML
and JavaScript unfold and cause XSS. Or even XAS.
● Although the application we pasted from doesn't
understand HTML at all. Strange, right?

Why did it happen?
● To understand, why it happened, we first must
understand where the HTML came from
● And what is the transport medium for the rogue
data
● We also need to understand what is expected
behavior
● And then we can learn how to deviate from
that. But how can we find out in the first place?

Let's go back in time
In the years before computers were around, even before photocopiers
were around, manuscript editing was a tedious craft. And it involved
scissors and often what was called “cut and paste”.
Editors were actually cutting text passages and images and pasted
them somewhere else. With actual glue.

Let's stay back in time
That is Apple's Lisa.
This computer supported something that
has been fist implemented in text editors in
the mid seventies
That feature was called “cut and paste” and
allowed developers to move segments of
text in a more convenient way. No scissors
involved.
Apple however was the one to name the
interim memory to store cut and paste data.
They called it “The Clipboard”.

The Origins of the Clipboard
Data transfer with expanded clipboard formats
EP 0717354 A1, 1995, MSFT

The Clipboard Today
● It stores intermediate data
● Sometimes the data goes from one position
in a document to another position
● Sometimes across documents
● Sometimes across applications
● Sometimes across systems
● Usually triggered by user-interaction
● Such as copy&paste
● Or cut&paste
● Or drag&drop
● The clipboard can handle many different data formats
● And that's where it's getting interesting!

A simple example
● Let's now copy a piece of text and see what happens in the
clipboard
● For examination, we use the tool ClipView from Peter Büttner,
written in July 2003
● So, we simply open the editor, notepad.exe, copy something
and use the tool

<![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang=EN-US style='tab-interval:.5in'>

<p class=MsoNormal><b style='mso-bidi-font-weight:normal'><span
style='font-size:22.0pt;line-height:107%'>JUSTIN <span
style='color:red'>B</span><span
style='color:#70AD47;mso-themecolor:accent6'>e</span><span
style='background:
yellow;mso-highlight:yellow'>i</span>b<span style='color:#4472C4;mso-
themecolor:
accent5'>er</span>! U are my HERO!<o:p></o:p></span></b></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><b style='mso-bidi-font-weight:normal'><u><span
style='font-size:22.0pt;line-height:107%;background:yellow;mso-
highlight:yellow'>Please
foollw me on Twertr</span></u></b><b style='mso-bidi-font-
weight:normal'><u><span
style='font-size:22.0pt;line-
height:107%'><o:p></o:p></span></u></b></p>

</body>
</html>

Let's Recap
● The clipboard is a complex object containing more than
just text.
● It can hold several different data formats at the same
time. Let's call those “buckets” for simplicity sake
● An application, upon copying or similar creates those
buckets and fills them with data
● Another application can pick one of these upon pasting
● If e.g. Office creates an HTML bucket from DOC,
MSIE can say “Hey – I'll take that one”
● There's almost unlimited types of buckets – it's all up to
the application
● A bucket can also contain file information, whole
folders, bitmaps, sound waves, whatever is necessary

Copy & Pest - A case-study on the clipboard, blind trust and invisible cross-application XSS

Now, Security
● If one application creates data that other
applications may use, injections might be
possible
● One application might be able to produce
data that harms the other application. Or
its user.
● But how can we get test if that is possible?
And how can we find injection points?

Let's analyze it!
We create a ODT file in
LibreOffice. We add
some interesting and
meaningful text with
styles and set it to a non-
standard font.
Then we copy the text
so we have it in our
clipboard.

What's in our clipboard?
We paste the copied
text into the browser.
Specifically a small
tool we created for
getting more
intelligence on the
HTML bucket of the
clipboard.

Does it correspond?
● Now, we can see that certain seemingly
influencable parts from the document are in the
generated HTML
● If we have a look into the document itself, will we
find and can we change those parts?
● And create a HTML injection with them?
● Let's try. OpenOffice documents are ZIP files.
● One of the contained files is called styles.xml
● It looks like this

Now, what can we do?
● We can in fact inject into the clipboard HTML!
● We can have a valid doc with no traces of an attack
by editing styles.xml
● We specifically change font family names.
● We can copy from that document and paste into the
browser.
● And we will be able to generate HTML from thin air.
● Because our injected text breaks the generated style
element and keeps going from there.
● We cannot inject scripts or iframes though.
● Because browsers sanitize the HTML clipboard!

OpenOffice → Browser
● Well, we know already that by injecting into the font-
family names inside styles.xml we can inject HTML on
paste
● But we cannot simply inject HTML that executes
JavaScript
● It will be stripped by the in-browser clipboard sanitizer
● So we need a bypass for that filter. And we need to
squeeze that into the font-family name
● Is there a bypass? Yes there is – even a multi-browser
bypass working on both Chrome and Firefox!

</style><svg><style>svg
{position:fixed}</style><style>svg
{top:0}</style><style>svg {left:0}</style>
<style>svg {height:10000px}</style> <style>svg
{width:10000px}</style> <style>svg
{opacity:0}</style> <a
xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"
xlink:href="?"><circle r="4000"></circle>
<animate attributeName="xlink:href" begin="0"
from="javascript:alert(document.domain)"
to="&" /> </a>

<office:font-face-decls><style:font-face
style:name="</style><div
contenteditable=false><svg><style>svg
{position:fixed}</style><style>svg
{top:0}</style><style>svg
{left:0}</style> <style>svg
{height:10000px}</style> <style>svg
{width:10000px}</style> <style>svg
{opacity:0}</style> <a
xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"
xlink:href="?"> <circle
r="4000"></circle> <animate
attributeName="xlink:href" begin="0"
from="javascript:alert(document.domain)"
to="&" /> </a>1" svg:font-
family="Harmless"/>

I. We create an OpenOffice document
II. We rename the file from ODT to ZIP
III. We open the ZIP and then edit the file styles.xml
IV. Inside that file we find “Micro Hei” and change it
V. We use a HTML-encoded closing style element and an
animatable SVG
VI. We do this because Firefox and Chrome sanitize the clipboard
VII. By using the SVG trick, we bypass the sanitizer
VIII.We save the styles.xml, rename the file from ZIP to ODT
IX. We copy from OpenOffice, paste into the browser
X. We have XSS on Firefox and Chrome

PDF → Browser
I. We create a benign PDF
II. We find the section on font-family names
III. We modify them carefully with a hex editor
IV. We learn that parenthesis is not allowed in font-family names
V. We evade that by using
I. VBS for IE10 or IE11 in IE10-docmode
II. ES6 and execution via alert`1` for IE12
VI. Adobe Reader produces a RTF bucket
VII. IE “understands” the RTF bucket and turns it into HTML
I. This alone should be another interesting research topic
VIII. We have another XSS

MS Office → Browser
I. We create a DOC file with a hyperlink
II. We carefully edit it via hex editor
III. We add some HTML around the hyperlink
IV. We use contenteditable=false to make it
“clickable”
V. Word creates a HTML bucket on copy
VI. MSIE “understands” that upon pasting
VII.We have an XSS
Or we do it just as with OpenOffice and use a DOCX instead
of a DOC, we open it as ZIP, edit around in the content file
and cause XSS like that

XPS → Browser: Cookbook
I. We take some free font from somewhere
II. We modify its properties using font-forge
III. We add XSS payload into one of the properties
IV. We install the font on our system
V. We create a document and save it as XPS
VI. The font will now be embedded
VII. We use the XPS on a different system
VIII.The font-family name will contain XSS payload
IX. IE understands that
X. We have another XSS
Again upon paste, this time no other user interaction required

Overview
● PDF → Browser, works in MSIE. PDF readers do not create a HTML
Bucket but MSIE also understands RTF buckets and transforms them to
HTML on its own.
● DOC/DOCX → Browser, works in MSIE – from Office 2013 but not the
Word Viewer. Similarly works in other office products
● XPS → Browser, works in MSIE because of a bug in the clipboard
sanitizer. Necessary tools here are a malicious font created with font-
forge
● ODT → Browser, works in Chrome and Firefox because of clipboard
sanitizer bugs. Sanitizer between tabs is fine, sanitizer between
applications is broken
● Most of the attacks survive changes in the document!
● “Affected” office software
● Office 2013, LibreOffice and similar tools, PDF Reader, FoxIT Reader
● They can be used to poison the clipboard with malicious markup
● Affected browsers
● Just MSIE, Chrome, Opera, Safari, Firefox, anything WebKit or Blink. Strangely,
Blink on Windows behaves differently from Blink on *nix

More Surface
● Attackers can use Flash to stuff your clipboard too
● Flash can fill the HTML and the RTF bucket
● All you need is a click
● You can also embed a Flash in a PDF and once it's
clicked it fills your clipboard
● On MSIE, you also have ways to fill the clipboard
without user consent, but no HTML or RTF buckets
● So Flash remains the most attractive vector
here
● Yet, abusing that smartly is a different story

Defense
● All discovered attack techniques were reported to browser
vendors. They need to fix their clipboard sanitizers
● Websites can fix the shortcomings of browsers too – and
sanitize after paste
● We can for instance utilize our tool DOMPurify to do the job
● To illustrate how it works, we created a browser extension
that does two things:
● We called it PastePurify. Don't use it, it's just a PoC!
● It sanitizes the HTML of an element pasted into after pasting. Not
optimal but good enough for a proof of concept
● It allows to show the HTML bucket of the clipboard. Very useful.
● Let's have a look at that!
● Oh, and NoScript has a fix too!
● And consider using Ctrl+Shift+V a bit more often :)

How it works
window.addEventListener('load', function(){
var cb = document.getElementById('clipboard');
cb.focus();
cb.addEventListener('paste', function(){
cb.value=event.clipboardData.getData('text/html');
}, false);
document.execCommand('paste');
}, false);

Future Work
●
We have seen data being copied from one software into another
● The manipulated documents were used to inject data into the
clipboard – that will then execute in a whole different context
● We mainly focused on office software and browsers.
Plausible attack and proper impact. Any why not, right?
● But we didn't have a look at different directions.
Or different types of software
● That said, the attack surface is huge!
●
Clipboard interaction is a major convenience tool and cannot be
replaced easily
● But it's completely transparent to the common user and much
damage can be dealt
● And by just looking at different software, you might find bugs
and attack vectors within hours
● Maybe a PoC || GTFO with some copy&paste surprises?

Conclusion
Be careful when you copy & paste.
Don't trust that invisible thing
that contains and deals out complex data.
One day, it's gonna bite you :)

The End
● Question?
● Comments?
● Thanks a lot!
● Talk Material & PoCs

Copy & Pest - A case-study on the clipboard, blind trust and invisible cross-application XSS

More Related Content

Copy & Pest - A case-study on the clipboard, blind trust and invisible cross-application XSS