9. 楽天のUCD
Strategy Information Architecture Design Check
Site User &
Business
Objective Scenario
Content Requirement /
Functional Specifications
Information
SEO
Design
Wireframe Interaction
(Interface) Design
Usability
Visual Design Analysis
Test
Usability
Test
10. 楽天のUCD
事業/BU
(Stakeholder)
Site Content Requirement /
Business
Objective Functional Specifications
開発/DU
(PRO/ENG)
編成/CWD Site Content Requirement /
Business
(DIR/DES) Objective Functional Specifications
User & Information Wireframe Interaction …
Scenario Design (Interface) Design
事業/BU 開発/DU 編成/CWD
PRJ
(Stakeholder) (PRO/ENG) (DIR/DES)
11. 要件(要求)が既に決まっていて検証
の余地がない…
(There was no validation because requirement has been already
decided…)
妥当性のある仮設を導き出せず、
PDCAを廻せない…
(Cannot make PDCA in action without any hypothesis…)
33. Integration of Satisfaction
Project Methodology
User Experience with the Method
Waterfall 2.5 2.9
Agile 3.1 3.7
Clearly, Agile is considerably better than the old Waterfall method.
Good riddance to that one. However, the professionals in our new study
still felt that Iterative Design was marginally better than Agile; there's
still work to be done to make Agile projects more user-driven.
In better news, the latest data provides some evidence that we're
moving beyond "them and us" — overall, developers were more bullish
than UX people on a couple of key UX opinion metrics.
via http://www.useit.com/alertbox/agile-user-experience.html