Perfection & Feedback Loops or: why worse is better

Perfection &
Feedback Loops
or: why worse is better
Marcus Denker
Talk held at ESUG2016

The slides as used for the talk are a bit useless alone.
This is a an annotated version, grey slides are
additions (links, notes…)
- Video: https://youtu.be/LRFLdWG24Mk
- The .key ﬁle has all videos embedded
All Files:
http://marcusdenker.de/talks/16ESUG

VIDEO on Youtube:
https://youtu.be/LRFLdWG24Mk

All two years I feel a strange urge to do a strange talk at
ESUG…
no idea if that is a good idea…

At ESUG 2014 I give a similar talk, this one is
kind of the same topic, but from another point of view.
See http://www.slideshare.net/MarcusDenker/2014-
esugcathedral

Perfection & Feedback Loops or: why worse is better

Knowing his quotes from the fortune unix command,
I did not know that Yogi Berra was a baseball player…
"I really didn't say everything I said.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yogi_Berra

“By the time you’ve arrived at the *perfect* solution,
usually the problem has already changed.”
— Jessie Shefrin (@jshefrin)

Quote thanks to Jessie Shefrin
http://artthinking.com
Why is that?

Context changes.
Would the perfect Programming Language and
Environment for 1985 be seen as perfect in 2016?
And it goes even deeper than that. Context is everything.
The same solution can be good or bad, depending on the
context it is embedded in.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HPPj6viIBmU

One of the ﬁrst viral videos of the internet.
The video should never have been posted, it is often
shown as an example of cyber bullying.
Lots of things can be learned, but what everyone agrees:
“Perfection” is the last thing that comes into mind.
So you are seeing this…

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3GJOVPjhXMY

… but his context was this. And it is just perfect.
Context is everything.

And context changes,
constantly

You are not alone in the world.
“Everyone, stop, until I created the perfect thing!”

Another problem: You learn
while building

When you are ready to ﬁnish, it will be obvious to you
that what you did is all bad. You could do so much
better… easily.
Now it is so obvious…
But the “old you” would love it. The old you did not yet
learn what the “new you” knows.
Keep in mind: everyone else but you did not learn what
makes you see your work as imperfect.

Everything you can *ﬁnish*
will "embody" its own critique.

… but to some extend others (and the old you) will
see the problems, though. A ﬁnished artefact always
embodies its own critique.
(If you can see ﬂaws in everything other people do,
maybe it is not because you are oh so clever?)

Ok, no perfection, but
better?

So, ok. There is no perfection.
But why can’t things be at least good?

Those who could have done better where
busy with building the perfect solution

…now they know how to do it right!
Just wait! It will be perfect!

Yes: there is something else
at play…

A force of incomprehensible
to mankind

“The greatest shortcoming of the human race is our
inability to understand the exponential function.”
— Al Bartlett

Watch on Youtube:
The Most IMPORTANT Video You'll Ever See
8 parts, 10 min each:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F-QA2rkpBSY

… you “know” it in theory

(you might “know” everything in the this talk…
theoretically)

By the time that the ﬁfth square is reached on the chessboard,
the board contains a total of 31 grains of wheat

How big can it get? There are just 64 ﬁelds…
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wheat_and_chessboard_problem

… round 1,000 times the global production of rice in 2010
(464,000,000 metric tons)

In a lake, there is a patch of lily pads. First
day there is one, second two. After long 47
days it is half full.
How long does it take to cover the whole lake?

47 long days to do half.. will take a while for sure…

Compound interest
S&P 500, invest $100 monthly.
Start: 1983

https://dqydj.com/sp-500-dividend-reinvestment-
and-periodic-investment-calculator/
not including taxes, but take fees into account.

We payed in not even 40K. How much is it now?

Payed: 39700
Today: 241036
not including taxes, but take fees into account.

Interesting:
— It’s not about doubling. ~8%
(doubles every 70/8 years)
— Most value is created by reinvesting
(feeding back) interest earned.

New theories and models makes ideas
thinkable that are just not thinkable without.

Example: Linux vs. Minix.
Minix was clearly better. But there was no
feedback loop for Minix.
Linux was a *process*, while Minix was a
ﬁnished artefact.

The ﬁrst microprocessor was designed with paper +
pen.
You could not design a current one without having
already a computer.
(Going back to paper+pen… why not go back to
sticks+stones?)
Another Example: LAM builds machines that build
processors. These machines *contain* processors
themselves.

Early results lead to fast feedback cycles…

Lean Startups, Minimum
Viable Product…

A startup just does not have resources for building
the perfect solution to a problem nobody cares
about.
Very hard to explain to our profession… spawned a
whole “self help book” section for Programmers.

Feedback loops do not care
about perfection

The system needs only to be good
enough to sustain the next step

If just barely good enough to sustain it,
feedback will happen within technically
horrible solutions.

“It will be perfect when it is
ﬁnished”
vs.
Feedback Loop Now

But just wait till my perfect system is ready.. it will
be so much better.
Really? Who will need it?

From self help books: do not focus on the goal ("I want
to loose weight”), but build instead a system that has
your goal as its result eventually. It is *much* easier, the
steps are smaller and manageable and even
automatic…
We should understand our programming goals the
same way…
http://www.iwillteachyoutoberich.com/blog/goal-setting-
is-dead-do-this-instead/
"Do try to tackle goals. Build systems instead"

Understand your Artefact as
a Feedback Loop

Every artefact exist in a loop. The most basic one can
see when looking at economics: if you can sell a
simple, imperfect, early version, you can invest all the
result back in your product.
Compare that with working in your spare time…

Works especially well for
Meta Systems

Especially systems that are used to create other
systems beneﬁt from feedback loops.
Improve your IDE and you will be more productive.
Reﬂective Systems even more: They are implemented in
themselves, so improving the system leads to a natural
cycle.

Smalltalk can be feedback
loop

Smalltalk is an example for a system where it is
very obvious.
Yet most Smalltalkers argue to never change
anything, to just build on top…

If you set the development
and community up correctly

An open source smalltalk ignoring all community
contributions, just as an example.

Remember: You just need to drive the next iteration!

Facebook poster. What they mean is that inside a
feedback loop, you reach perfection when you reach
the point where the next iteration can build on it (aka
DONE).
http://benbarry.com/project/facebook-propaganda-
posters

Remember: feeding back creates non-linear growth.
Even though you just get <10% interest, most of your
account will be interest.

A small change fed back will
have huge payout

That idiotic change will pay for 10, 20, 30 years…

A tiny linear change now would be
a huge change some iterations ago

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y97rBdSYbkg

Why topple the small? To learn and ﬁne-tune the system!

Peter Principle: “that tiny one? I do the next one, more
interesting!”
Until you reach the one too large.

Goals vs. Systems:
It's a musical thing

Focus on the Process, not
the Goal

Do not postpone your life to the future
“when you are ﬁnished”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ERbvKrH-GC4

The video has a slightly different angle…
the one shown in the talk has the middle part
cut.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ERbvKrH-
GC4

Twitter: @marcusdenker
http://marcusdenker.de

Perfection & Feedback Loops or: why worse is better

More Related Content

Perfection & Feedback Loops or: why worse is better