Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Apr 8:3:69-91.
doi: 10.2147/ijgm.s8184.

Treatment of congestion in upper respiratory diseases

Affiliations

Treatment of congestion in upper respiratory diseases

Eli O Meltzer et al. Int J Gen Med. .

Abstract

Congestion, as a symptom of upper respiratory tract diseases including seasonal and perennial allergic rhinitis, acute and chronic rhinosinusitis, and nasal polyposis, is principally caused by mucosal inflammation. Though effective pharmacotherapy options exist, no agent is universally efficacious; therapeutic decisions must account for individual patient preferences. Oral H(1)-antihistamines, though effective for the common symptoms of allergic rhinitis, have modest decongestant action, as do leukotriene receptor antagonists. Intranasal antihistamines appear to improve congestion better than oral forms. Topical decongestants reduce congestion associated with allergic rhinitis, but local adverse effects make them unsuitable for long-term use. Oral decongestants show some efficacy against congestion in allergic rhinitis and the common cold, and can be combined with oral antihistamines. Intranasal corticosteroids have broad anti-inflammatory activities, are the most potent long-term pharmacologic treatment of congestion associated with allergic rhinitis, and show some congestion relief in rhinosinusitis and nasal polyposis. Immunotherapy and surgery may be used in some cases refractory to pharmacotherapy. Steps in congestion management include (1) diagnosis of the cause(s), (2) patient education and monitoring, (3) avoidance of environmental triggers where possible, (4) pharmacotherapy, and (5) immunotherapy (for patients with allergic rhinitis) or surgery for patients whose condition is otherwise uncontrolled.

Keywords: allergic rhinitis; congestion; obstruction; rhinosinusitis; treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Least squares mean change in the composite daytime nasal symptoms score and its components during a 6-week trial of montelukast versus placebo in patients with perennial allergic rhinitis. Baseline scores are shown above the bars. aP < 0.001; bP < 0.05. Error bars represent SE. Reproduced with permission from Patel P, Philip G, Yang W, et al Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of montelukast for treating perennial allergic rhinitis. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2005; 95(6):551–557. Copyright © 2005 American College of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Nasal obstruction mean score versus treatment days. P < 0.001 for COM vs CTZ; P = 0.004 for COM vs PER; P = 0.128 for CTZ vs PER. Reproduced with permission from Bertrand B, Jamart J, Marchal JL, Arendt C. Cetirizine and pseudoephedrine retard alone and in combination in the treatment of perennial allergic rhinitis: a double-blind multicentre study. Rhinology. 1996;34(2):91–96. Copyright © 1996 International Rhinologic Society. Abbreviations: COM, combination of cetirizine and pseudoephedrine; CTZ, cetirizine; PER, pseudoephedrine.
Figure 3
Figure 3
A) Meta-analysis of intranasal corticosteroids versus oral H1-receptor antagonists for the treatment of nasal blockage in allergic rhinitis. Intranasal steroids included beclomethasone dipropionate, fluticasone propionate, triamcinolone acetonide, and budesonide. Oral antihistamines included dexchlorpheniramine, terfenadine, astemizole, loratadine, and cetirizine. Adapted with permission from British Medical Journal, Weiner JM, Abramson MJ, Puy RM, volume 317, 1624–1629, Copyright © 1998 with permission from BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. B) Meta-analysis of intranasal corticosteroids versus topical H1-receptor antagonists for the treatment of nasal blockage in allergic rhinitis. Intranasal steroids included beclomethasone dipropionate, fluticasone propionate, and budesonide. Topical antihistamines included azelastine and levocabastine. Adapted with permission from Yáñez A, Rodrigo GJ. Intranasal corticosteroids versus topical H1 receptor antagonists for the treatment of allergic rhinitis: a systematic review with metaanalysis. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2002;89(5):479–484. Copyright © 2002 American College of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Percent change in congestion symptom score in a pooled analysis of 4 studies with mometasone furoate in seasonal allergic rhinitis. The magnitude of change was greatest in patients with the highest baseline congestion scores. Mean baseline congestion scores in the overall population were 2.24 in the mometasone furoate group and 2.25 in the placebo group. In the >2.5 baseline congestion score group, the baseline scores were 2.83 (mometasone furoate) and 2.84 (placebo). In the >2.75 group, the baseline scores were 2.94 in both the mometasone furoate and placebo groups. aP < 0.001 vs placebo. Adapted with permission from Berger WE, Nayak AS, Staudinger HW. Mometasone furoate improves congestion in patients with moderate-to-severe seasonal allergic rhinitis. Ann Pharmacother. 2005;39(12):1984–1989. Copyright © 2005 Harvey Whitney Books Co.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Mean change in turbinate swelling/obstruction score over 3 weeks in patients with acute rhinosinusitis treated with amoxicillin clavulanate potassium (ACP) 500 mg 3 times daily (TID) and either flunisolide 100 μg 3 times daily or placebo 3 times daily. aP = 0.041 versus ACP 500 mg 3 times daily + placebo TID. Reprinted from J Allergy Clin Immunol, Vol 92, Meltzer EO, Orgel HA, Backhaus JW, et al. Intranasal flunisolide spray as an adjunct to oral antibiotic therapy for sinusitis. Pages 812–823, Copyright © 1993, with permission from Mosby-Year Book, Inc.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Prenner BM, Schenkel E. Allergic rhinitis: treatment based on patient profiles. Am J Med. 2006;119(3):230–237. - PubMed
    1. Shedden A. Impact of nasal congestion on quality of life and work productivity in allergic rhinitis: findings from a large online survey. Treat Respir Med. 2005;4(6):439–446. - PubMed
    1. Lundbäck B. Epidemiology of rhinitis and asthma. Clin Exp Allergy. 1998;28(Suppl 2):3–10. - PubMed
    1. Hickner JM, Bartlett JG, Besser RE. Principles of appropriate antibiotic use for acute rhinosinusitis in adults: background. Ann Intern Med. 2001;134(6):498–505. - PubMed
    1. Leggett JE. Acute sinusitis. When – and when not – to prescribe antibiotics. Postgrad Med. 2004;115(1):13–19. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources