Differences in electric brain responses to melodies and chords
- PMID: 19702466
- DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21338
Differences in electric brain responses to melodies and chords
Abstract
The music we usually listen to in everyday life consists of either single melodies or harmonized melodies (i.e., of melodies "accompanied" by chords). However, differences in the neural mechanisms underlying melodic and harmonic processing have remained largely unknown. Using EEG, this study compared effects of music-syntactic processing between chords and melodies. In melody blocks, sequences consisted of five tones, the final tone being either regular or irregular (p = .5). Analogously, in chord blocks, sequences consisted of five chords, the final chord function being either regular or irregular. Melodies were derived from the top voice of chord sequences, allowing a proper comparison between melodic and harmonic processing. Music-syntactic incongruities elicited an early anterior negativity with a latency of approximately 125 msec in both the melody and the chord conditions. This effect was followed in the chord condition, but not in the melody condition, by an additional negative effect that was maximal at approximately 180 msec. Both effects were maximal at frontal electrodes, but the later effect was more broadly distributed over the scalp than the earlier effect. These findings indicate that melodic information (which is also contained in the top voice of chords) is processed earlier and with partly different neural mechanisms than harmonic information of chords.
Similar articles
-
Effects of selective attention on syntax processing in music and language.J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Sep;23(9):2252-67. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2010.21542. Epub 2010 Jul 9. J Cogn Neurosci. 2011. PMID: 20617885
-
Aesthetic judgments of music in experts and laypersons--an ERP study.Int J Psychophysiol. 2010 Apr;76(1):40-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2010.02.002. Epub 2010 Feb 11. Int J Psychophysiol. 2010. PMID: 20153786
-
Untangling syntactic and sensory processing: an ERP study of music perception.Psychophysiology. 2007 May;44(3):476-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00517.x. Psychophysiology. 2007. PMID: 17433099
-
Toward the neural basis of processing structure in music. Comparative results of different neurophysiological investigation methods.Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2003 Nov;999:15-28. doi: 10.1196/annals.1284.002. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2003. PMID: 14681114 Review.
-
Experimental strategies for understanding the role of experience in music cognition.Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2003 Nov;999:414-28. doi: 10.1196/annals.1284.052. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2003. PMID: 14681166 Review.
Cited by
-
Enhanced brainstem encoding predicts musicians' perceptual advantages with pitch.Eur J Neurosci. 2011 Feb;33(3):530-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2010.07527.x. Epub 2010 Dec 29. Eur J Neurosci. 2011. PMID: 21198980 Free PMC article.
-
Music in Research and Rehabilitation of Disorders of Consciousness: Psychological and Neurophysiological Foundations.Front Psychol. 2015 Nov 27;6:1763. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01763. eCollection 2015. Front Psychol. 2015. PMID: 26640445 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Musical training shapes neural responses to melodic and prosodic expectation.Brain Res. 2016 Nov 1;1650:267-282. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2016.09.015. Epub 2016 Sep 10. Brain Res. 2016. PMID: 27622645 Free PMC article.
-
The association between liking, learning and creativity in music.Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 16;14(1):19048. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-70027-z. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 39152203 Free PMC article.
-
Differences in Neurocognitive Mechanisms Underlying the Processing of Center-Embedded and Non-embedded Musical Structures.Front Hum Neurosci. 2018 Oct 23;12:425. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00425. eCollection 2018. Front Hum Neurosci. 2018. PMID: 30405379 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources