Differences in electric brain responses to melodies and chords
- PMID: 19702466
- DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21338
Differences in electric brain responses to melodies and chords
Abstract
The music we usually listen to in everyday life consists of either single melodies or harmonized melodies (i.e., of melodies "accompanied" by chords). However, differences in the neural mechanisms underlying melodic and harmonic processing have remained largely unknown. Using EEG, this study compared effects of music-syntactic processing between chords and melodies. In melody blocks, sequences consisted of five tones, the final tone being either regular or irregular (p = .5). Analogously, in chord blocks, sequences consisted of five chords, the final chord function being either regular or irregular. Melodies were derived from the top voice of chord sequences, allowing a proper comparison between melodic and harmonic processing. Music-syntactic incongruities elicited an early anterior negativity with a latency of approximately 125 msec in both the melody and the chord conditions. This effect was followed in the chord condition, but not in the melody condition, by an additional negative effect that was maximal at approximately 180 msec. Both effects were maximal at frontal electrodes, but the later effect was more broadly distributed over the scalp than the earlier effect. These findings indicate that melodic information (which is also contained in the top voice of chords) is processed earlier and with partly different neural mechanisms than harmonic information of chords.
Similar articles
-
Effects of selective attention on syntax processing in music and language.J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Sep;23(9):2252-67. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2010.21542. Epub 2010 Jul 9. J Cogn Neurosci. 2011. PMID: 20617885
-
Aesthetic judgments of music in experts and laypersons--an ERP study.Int J Psychophysiol. 2010 Apr;76(1):40-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2010.02.002. Epub 2010 Feb 11. Int J Psychophysiol. 2010. PMID: 20153786
-
Untangling syntactic and sensory processing: an ERP study of music perception.Psychophysiology. 2007 May;44(3):476-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00517.x. Psychophysiology. 2007. PMID: 17433099
-
Toward the neural basis of processing structure in music. Comparative results of different neurophysiological investigation methods.Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2003 Nov;999:15-28. doi: 10.1196/annals.1284.002. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2003. PMID: 14681114 Review.
-
Experimental strategies for understanding the role of experience in music cognition.Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2003 Nov;999:414-28. doi: 10.1196/annals.1284.052. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2003. PMID: 14681166 Review.
Cited by
-
Neural correlates of music-syntactic processing in two-year old children.Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2014 Jul;9:200-8. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2014.04.005. Epub 2014 May 20. Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2014. PMID: 24907450 Free PMC article.
-
Brain networks underlying aesthetic appreciation as modulated by interaction of the spectral and temporal organisations of music.Sci Rep. 2019 Dec 19;9(1):19446. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-55781-9. Sci Rep. 2019. PMID: 31857651 Free PMC article.
-
Syntactic processing in music and language: Parallel abnormalities observed in congenital amusia.Neuroimage Clin. 2018 May 24;19:640-651. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2018.05.032. eCollection 2018. Neuroimage Clin. 2018. PMID: 30013922 Free PMC article.
-
Neurophysiological and Behavioral Differences between Older and Younger Adults When Processing Violations of Tonal Structure in Music.Front Neurosci. 2018 Feb 13;12:54. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00054. eCollection 2018. Front Neurosci. 2018. PMID: 29487498 Free PMC article.
-
Musicians and tone-language speakers share enhanced brainstem encoding but not perceptual benefits for musical pitch.Brain Cogn. 2011 Oct;77(1):1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2011.07.006. Epub 2011 Aug 10. Brain Cogn. 2011. PMID: 21835531 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
