+972 52-548-6969
Seeing the results of Corax in production
time to read 1 min | 121 words
Corax was released just under a year ago, and we are seeing more customers deploying that to production. During a call with a customer, we noticed the following detail:
Let me explain what we are seeing here. The two indexes are the same, operating on the same set of documents. The only difference between those indexes is the indexing engine.
What is really amazing here is that Corax is able to index in 3:21 minutes what Lucene takes 17:15 minutes to index. In other words, Corax is more than 5 times faster than Lucene in a real world scenario.
And these news make me very happy.
Comments
Do you know if Lucene has had any great performance updates? Seeing as ravendb uses 3.0 while that is about 13 years old and they currently are on version 9.
Not meant to dismiss your achievements with corax, as lucene is still considered the de facto standard. It is just that people usually refer to Java lucene, .net lucene has died a long time ago
This looks fantastic. Is it possible to migrate a Lucene index to Corax? I didn't see it on first glance in the Studio.
What'ѕ uρ, itѕ good article concerning media print, we аⅼl be aware of mеdia is a fantastic sourcе of data.
Introduction: Ιn tоɗɑү'ѕ digital age, businesses ɑге increasingly reliant оn tһeir online presence tο attract customers ɑnd genesrate revenue.
Tһis page ceｒtainly hһas аll the information I needｅd about this subject ɑnd didn't know who to ask.
Un antrenor alergare montană tе ѵa ajuta ѕă îți creezi սn program adaptat nevoilor tale și nivelului tău ɗe fitness.
Comment preview
Join the conversation...