|
|
Subscribe / Log in / New account

The "too small to fail" memory-allocation rule

The "too small to fail" memory-allocation rule

Posted Jan 1, 2015 21:16 UTC (Thu) by zlynx (guest, #2285)
In reply to: The "too small to fail" memory-allocation rule by cyronin
Parent article: The "too small to fail" memory-allocation rule

> I've often been told that the best way to learn something is to assert the wrong thing to experts, and they will give a clearer rationale on that topic than you will ever get from any other source.

This may be true but to do it on purpose only wastes the expert's time and make them stop wanting to talk to anyone.

In my opinion this is why discussions on comp.lang.c eventually turned every thread into "Read the FAQ" and for a while StackOverflow every new question was turned into a duplicate, until it became too much work to even find the duplicate for each stupid question and now the site is mostly junk. In my opinion.


to post comments

The "too small to fail" memory-allocation rule

Posted Jan 2, 2015 3:12 UTC (Fri) by marcH (subscriber, #57642) [Link]

> and now the site is mostly junk

Who reads the entire site and cares?


Copyright © 2025, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds