|
|
Subscribe / Log in / New account

Re: Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.

Re: Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.

Posted Dec 31, 2014 21:01 UTC (Wed) by ldo (guest, #40946)
In reply to: Re: If this is just an exercise, perhaps a smaller one would do by cesarb
Parent article: The "too small to fail" memory-allocation rule

*Yawn* More content-free hand-waving hot air. Show us the code!


to post comments

Re: Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.

Posted Dec 31, 2014 22:25 UTC (Wed) by bronson (subscriber, #4806) [Link] (1 responses)

If you want something to be rewritten so bad, why don't you rewrite the goto-laden kernel examples cesarb posted? It should be easy to demonstrate how much more readable your technique is.

Re: why don't you rewrite the goto-laden kernel examples cesarb posted?

Posted Jan 1, 2015 21:46 UTC (Thu) by ldo (guest, #40946) [Link]

Because they’re just not that interesting.


Copyright © 2025, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds