Going over the spec for this again, I noticed that some of the other JSON properties for these two could also use updating. So I'm marking it as a WIP for now.

This is the definition of appliesto in the latest spec for these elements:

All elements. In SVG, it applies to container elements excluding the defs element, all graphics elements and the use element

Which deviates from the allElementsSVGContainerElements used in the JSON currently.

What would be a suitable replacement?

Attempting to break it down:

All elements. -> allElements
In SVG, it applies to container elements -> SVGContainerElements
excluding the defs element, all graphics elements and the use element -> ExcludingDefsGraphicsAndUse

Result:

allElementsSVGContainerElementsExcludingDefsGraphicsAndUse

or (perhaps slightly clearer)

allElementsAndSVGContainerElementsExcludingDefsGraphicsAndUse

Thoughts?

Excluding (more in line with text in spec) or Except (more in line with existing schema entries)?

Going over the spec for this again, I noticed that some of the other JSON properties for these two could also use updating. So I'm marking it as a WIP for now.

This is the definition of appliesto in the latest spec for these elements:

All elements. In SVG, it applies to container elements excluding the defs element, all graphics elements and the use element

Which deviates from the allElementsSVGContainerElements used in the JSON currently.

What would be a suitable replacement?

Attempting to break it down:

All elements. -> allElements In SVG, it applies to container elements -> SVGContainerElements excluding the defs element, all graphics elements and the use element -> ExcludingDefsGraphicsAndUse

Result:

allElementsSVGContainerElementsExcludingDefsGraphicsAndUse

or (perhaps slightly clearer)

allElementsAndSVGContainerElementsExcludingDefsGraphicsAndUse

Thoughts?

Excluding (more in line with text in spec) or Except (more in line with existing schema entries)?

Personnally, both is ok, as this does not affect user

After updating from main, there's no changes, so the linked commits have resolved this. I'm going to close this, thank you!