Add missing unowned specifiers #11248
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
ncooke3
approved these changes
May 9, 2023
|
I discovered it working on the Auth Swift implementation. See #11246 |
ryanwilson
requested changes
May 9, 2023
ryanwilson
approved these changes
May 10, 2023
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Add a
weakspecifier that was missed in the Swift transition. [Edit:unownedinstead ofweak. See discussion below.]Testing seems to show that this causes a retain cycle leak for ObjC clients. The Swift runtime seems to detect the cycle and avoid the leak, even without this change.