Description
Checklist
- I have filled out the template to the best of my ability.This only contains 1 feature request (if you have multiple feature requests, open one feature request for each feature request).This issue is not a duplicate feature request of previous feature requests.
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
The Centris 2, Centris 3 and Centris 4 all appear to have the same GU10 spots with different model IDs, specific to the Centris series. A Centris spot can be replaced with a standard Hue GU10 in case it breaks.
Currently, there are LUT profiles for Centris 3 and Centris 4 but not Centris 2
Describe the solution you'd like
Create Aliases for all Centris spots.
The main light panel is different for each Centris model, so I'll do measurements for those separately.
@bramstroker: let me know if you agree (or disagree) with the approach so I can prepare the measurements and pull request.
Describe alternatives you've considered
The alternative is to have LUT profiles for each Centris model.
Additional context
light.centris_2_panel: Found model information on device (manufacturer=Signify Netherlands B.V., model=Hue Centris ceiling (5061030P7_01), model_id=None)
light.centris_2_spot_1: Found model information on device (manufacturer=Signify Netherlands B.V., model=Hue Centris spot (5061030P7_02), model_id=None)
light.centris_2_spot_2: Found model information on device (manufacturer=Signify Netherlands B.V., model=Hue Centris spot (5061030P7_03), model_id=None)
light.centris_3_panel: Found model information on device (manufacturer=Signify Netherlands B.V., model=Hue Centris ceiling (5060830P7_01), model_id=None)
light.centris_3_spot_1: Found model information on device (manufacturer=Signify Netherlands B.V., model=Hue Centris spot (5060830P7_02), model_id=None)
light.centris_3_spot_2: Found model information on device (manufacturer=Signify Netherlands B.V., model=Hue Centris spot (5060830P7_03), model_id=None)
light.centris_3_spot_3: Found model information on device (manufacturer=Signify Netherlands B.V., model=Hue Centris spot (5060830P7_04), model_id=None)
light.centris_4_panel: Found model information on device (manufacturer=Signify Netherlands B.V., model=Hue Centris ceiling (5060730P7_01), model_id=None)
light.centris_4_spot_1: Found model information on device (manufacturer=Signify Netherlands B.V., model=Hue Centris spot (5060730P7_02), model_id=None)
light.centris_4_spot_2: Found model information on device (manufacturer=Signify Netherlands B.V., model=Hue Centris spot (5060730P7_03), model_id=None)
light.centris_4_spot_3: Found model information on device (manufacturer=Signify Netherlands B.V., model=Hue Centris spot (5060730P7_04), model_id=None)
light.centris_4_spot_4: Found model information on device (manufacturer=Signify Netherlands B.V., model=Hue Centris spot (5060730P7_05), model_id=None)
Activity
bramstroker commentedon Jan 15, 2025
@AJediIAm Thanks for this information.
Currently centris 3 and centris 4 lights are supported. And there is a PR for centris 2.
Centris 2: #2833
Centris 3: #1538
Centris 4: #1427
However looking at the graphs the consumption seems to be for the full light, the LED panel plus all the spots.
So this is a relatively big issue imo.
You integration allows to control all the spots and led panel seperately, but there are no seperate profiles (yet) for the spot and panel. Probably the initial contributor had an integration where he could only control the full light.
Currently the profile will be bounded to each entity light.panel + light.spot_1 -> light.spot4.
So this means the power consumption will be a factor 5 off in your case, and probably also for many other users of powercalc which has the Centris light.
Centris 4:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/161d2/161d29ddd52ed2534a99da11a14d839af449ed5e" alt="Screenshot 2025-01-15 at 20 00 08"
Centris 3:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4b9bf/4b9bfd6ea7f1e559e3e3c6ed39501a617a5b52d5" alt="Screenshot 2025-01-15 at 20 00 33"
Also I see there was some discussion on it here:
#1717
But the final conclusion seems wrong.
Would be nice if you can do some measurements to have separate measurements for spot and panel.
And also cross reference for full fixture.
Then we can see how to go from there. Using sub profiles seems to be the way to go for this ligh. where the user can select the right submodel (either
spot
orpanel
) when configuring after discovery.So I suggest to do following measurements for Centris 2:
When we also have 2 spots measurements we can compare with 1 spot.
If the measurements are exactly doubled we can have the profile for 1 spot and reuse / alias that for Centris 2 and Centris 3.
AJediIAm commentedon Jan 15, 2025
On it!
If anyone wants to contribute data, feel free to pitch in.
bramstroker commentedon Jan 15, 2025
@AJediIAm please also see latest comments on #2833.
We can just alias all the spot id's to profile_library/signify/LCG002/model.json, as that is the generic GU10 Hue bulb.
Still would be good to take some measurements for cross reference, so we are sure everything is correct now.
The actual centris profile than only needs to be the panel measurements for:
Might be these are already correct in the database.
But still a good idea to cross reference.
bramstroker commentedon Feb 8, 2025
@AJediIAm where you still able to do the centris measurements?
AJediIAm commentedon Feb 11, 2025
It takes much longer than expected since the power meter doesn't fit in the wall box, so I need to do the measurements when the kids are not around. Since a good measurement takes a few hours, I only have 1 day per week to make progress.
I'm using the lightbar as dummy load and measure the "hs" of every spot to see if they are identical. It's not a proper measurement for the lut, but it should be good enough to confirm or disprove the spots are all the same.
Do you think this approach will result in a good conclusion?
bramstroker commentedon Feb 13, 2025
No worries Jaap, take your time.
lightbar seems not really a good reliable choice as dummy load, but to see if both spots have the same characteristics I think it should suffice.