Talk:Volume of distribution

Latest comment: 6 months ago by 102.90.65.113 in topic Pharmacology

The definition while accurate, is confusing. I would like to revert the previous edit but I have no idea how.

Perhaps a comma in place of the "in" that I added would make the sentence less ambiguous.


References (1) is wrong and (2) is broken. Didnt checked others. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.118.162.180 (talk) 03:06, 19 March 2012 (UTC)Reply



In the table, the ka has an example value of "0.693 −1" should that be "0.693 h−1"? Phytism (talk) 12:19, 13 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Pharmacology

edit

volume of distribution in pharmacology 102.90.65.113 (talk) 19:07, 16 May 2024 (UTC)Reply