skip to main content
10.1145/2538862.2538959acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessigcseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Framing classroom climate for student learning and retention in computer science

Published: 05 March 2014 Publication History

Abstract

Despite the best laid plans, counterproductive student behavior can interfere with faculty establishment of supportive classroom climates. This paper describes methods for framing the climate of the computer science classroom to minimize outspoken students' unwanted displays of intellectual prowess and engender co-learning behavior among students. Explicit framing of a supportive climate reduces student anxiety about their status among peers, leads them to expect to co-learn concepts, and reduces trepidations about speaking up in class. The framing is grounded by preemptively establishing expectations and addressing concerns through student discussion; asking students to go outside of their interaction style comfort zones for speaking in class; and explicitly describing teaching choices and classroom processes. The framing is reinforced by exposing wrong answers as useful rather than embarrassing, turn-taking techniques for equal student participation, and collaborative learning for assignments and in-class problem solving. Classroom-based retention techniques are important for retaining students who are less experienced with computer science and unsure how to interpret peers? public knowledge claims in relation to their own knowledge or faculty expectations.

References

[1]
Alvarado, C. and Dodds, Z. 2010. Women in CS: an evaluation of three promising practices. Proceedings of the 41st ACM technical symposium on Computer science education (Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA, 2010), 57--61.
[2]
Astin, A.W. 1984. Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Personnel. 25, 4 (1984), 297--308.
[3]
Astin, A.W. 1993. What matters in college? Four critical years revisited. Jossey-Bass.
[4]
Baeten, M., Dochy, F. and Struyven, K. 2013. The effects of different learning environments on students' motivation for learning and their achievement. British Journal of Educational Psychology. 83, 3 (2013), 484--501.
[5]
Barker, L.J. and Garvin-Doxas, K. 2004. Making visible the behaviors that influence learning environment: A qualitative exploration of computer science classrooms. Computer Science Education. 14, 2 (2004), 119--146.
[6]
Barker, L.J., Garvin-Doxas, K. and Jackson, M. 2002. Defensive climate in the computer science classroom. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin. 34, 1 (2002), 43--47.
[7]
Barker, L.J., McDowell, C. and Kalahar, K. 2009. Exploring factors that influence computer science introductory course students to persist in the major. Proceedings of the 40th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education (Chattanooga, TN, USA, 2009), 153--157.
[8]
Bateson, G. 1972. Steps to an ecology of mind; collected essays in anthropology, psychiatry, evolution, and epistemology. Chandler Pub. Co.
[9]
Blumenfeld, P.C., Mergendoller, J.R. and Swarthout, D.W. 1987. Task as a heuristic for understanding student learning and motivation. Journal of Curricul. 19, 2 (1987), 135--148.
[10]
Gibb, J.R. 1961. Defensive communication. Journal of Communication. 2, 3 (1961), 141--148.
[11]
Goffman, E. 1974. Frame analysis: an essay on the organization of experience. Harper & Row.
[12]
Good, T.L. and Brophy, J.E. 2000. Looking in classrooms. Longman.
[13]
Hanrahan, M. 1998. The effect of learning environment factors on students' motivation and learning. International Journal of Science Education. 20, 6 (1998), 737--753.
[14]
Harvey Mudd College Computer Science Course Descriptions: http://www.cs.hmc.edu/program/course-descriptions/.
[15]
Jacobson, N. and Schaefer, S.K. 2008. Pair programming in CS1: overcoming objections to its adoption. SIGCSE Bull. 40, 2 (2008), 93--96.
[16]
Katz, S., Allbritton, D., Aronis, J., Wilson, C. and Soffa, M.L. 2006. Gender, achievement, and persistence in an undergraduate computer science program. The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems. 37, 4 (2006), 42--57.
[17]
Knowles, M., Holton, E.F., III and Swanson, R.A. 2005. The adult learner. Elsevier.
[18]
Lea, S.J., Stephenson, D. and Troy, J. 2003. Higher Education Students' Attitudes to Student-centred Learning: Beyond "educational bulimia" Studies in Higher Education. 28, 3 (2003), 321--334.
[19]
Lemov, D. 2010. Teach like a champion. Gildan Media.
[20]
Lent, Brown and Hackett 2000. Contextual supports and barriers to career choice: A social cognitive analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology. 47, 1 (2000), 36--49.
[21]
McDowell, C., Werner, L., Bullock, H.E. and Fernald, J. 2003. The impact of pair programming on student performance, perception and persistence. International Conference on Software Engineering (Portland, Oregon, 2003), 602--607.
[22]
Östberg, V. 2003. Children in classrooms: peer status, status distribution and mental well-being. Social Science & Medicine. 56, 1 (Jan. 2003), 17--29.
[23]
Pascarella, E.T. and Terenzini, P.T. 1991. How college affects students: Findings and insights from twenty years of research. Jossey-Bass.
[24]
Powell, R.G. and Powell, D. 2010. Classroom communication and diversity: Enhancing instructional practice. Routledge.
[25]
R. D. Fulton 1991. A conceptual model for understanding the physical attributes of learning environments. Creating environments for effective adult learning. Hiemstra, R., ed. Jossey-Bass. 13--22.
[26]
Roberts, M.R.H., McGill, T. and Koppi, T. 2011. What Students are Telling us about Why They Left Their ICT Course. Innovation in Teaching and Learning in Information and Computer Sciences. 10, 3 (Nov. 2011), 68--83.
[27]
Schmuck, R.A. and Schmuck, P.A. 2001. Group processes in the classroom. McGraw Hill.
[28]
Simon, B. and Hanks, B. 2008. First-year students' impressions of pair programming in CS1. J. Educ. Resour. Comput. 7, 4 (Jan. 2008), 5:1--5:28.
[29]
Sterling, D.R. 2009. Classroom management: Setting up the classroom for learning. Science Scope. 32, 9 (2009), 29--33.
[30]
Strenta, A.C., Elliott, R., Adair, R., Matier, M. and Scott, J. 1994. Choosing and Leaving Science in Highly Selective Institutions. Res. High. Educ. 35, 5 (1994), 513--547.
[31]
The Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System: http://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/. Accessed: 2010-03--21.
[32]
Think-Pair-Share: http://serc.carleton.edu/introgeo/interactive/tpshare.html. Accessed: 2013-09-06.
[33]
Titsworth, B.S. 2001. Immediate and delayed effects of interest cues and engagement cues on students' affective learning. Communication Studies. 52, 3 (2001), 169--179.
[34]
Williams, L.A. 2000. Strengthening the case for pair programming. IEEE Software. 17, 4 (2000), 17--25.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Examining Intention to Major in Computer Science: Perceived Potential and ChallengesProceedings of the 55th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3626252.3630843(1237-1243)Online publication date: 7-Mar-2024
  • (2024)A Framework For Discussing Black Student Threats to Belonging in Computer Science2024 Black Issues in Computing Education (BICE)10.1109/BICE60192.2024.00011(15-20)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2024
  • (2023)Student Experiences and Academic Outcomes When Multiple Introductory Tracks ConvergeProceedings of the 2023 Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3587102.3588841(89-95)Online publication date: 29-Jun-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Framing classroom climate for student learning and retention in computer science

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    SIGCSE '14: Proceedings of the 45th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education
    March 2014
    800 pages
    ISBN:9781450326056
    DOI:10.1145/2538862
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 05 March 2014

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. classroom climate
    2. classroom management
    3. student retention

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    SIGCSE '14
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    SIGCSE '14 Paper Acceptance Rate 108 of 274 submissions, 39%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 1,595 of 4,542 submissions, 35%

    Upcoming Conference

    SIGCSE TS 2025
    The 56th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education
    February 26 - March 1, 2025
    Pittsburgh , PA , USA

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)48
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5
    Reflects downloads up to 06 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Examining Intention to Major in Computer Science: Perceived Potential and ChallengesProceedings of the 55th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3626252.3630843(1237-1243)Online publication date: 7-Mar-2024
    • (2024)A Framework For Discussing Black Student Threats to Belonging in Computer Science2024 Black Issues in Computing Education (BICE)10.1109/BICE60192.2024.00011(15-20)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2024
    • (2023)Student Experiences and Academic Outcomes When Multiple Introductory Tracks ConvergeProceedings of the 2023 Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3587102.3588841(89-95)Online publication date: 29-Jun-2023
    • (2023)"A field where you will be accepted": Belonging in student and TA interactions in post-secondary CS educationProceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research - Volume 110.1145/3568813.3600128(356-370)Online publication date: 7-Aug-2023
    • (2023)How do Teaching Practices and Use of Software Features Relate to Computer Science Student Belonging in Synchronous Remote Learning Environments?Proceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3545945.3569876(771-777)Online publication date: 2-Mar-2023
    • (2023)Using Near-Peer Interviews to Support English Language LearnersProceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3545945.3569868(952-958)Online publication date: 2-Mar-2023
    • (2023)(Work in Progress) Mindset in the Computing Classroom and Broadening Participation: A Pilot Study2023 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)10.1109/FIE58773.2023.10343380(1-5)Online publication date: 18-Oct-2023
    • (2023)Measuring Computing Students' Perceptions of Social Presence and Engagement in Synchronous Remote v. In-Person Classes2023 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)10.1109/FIE58773.2023.10342909(1-8)Online publication date: 18-Oct-2023
    • (2023)Investigating inclusive professional engineering identity developmental patterns of first‐year engineering majors: A person‐centered approachJournal of Engineering Education10.1002/jee.20567113:1(75-102)Online publication date: 12-Dec-2023
    • (2022)“Go[ing] Hard...as a Woman of Color”: A Case Study Examining Identity Work within a Performative Dance and Computing Learning EnvironmentACM Transactions on Computing Education10.1145/353100022:4(1-29)Online publication date: 15-Sep-2022
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media