A Translucent Wire in the Sky

eruvAn eruv demarcation wire in the West 50s. (Photo: Don Hogan Charles/The New York Times)

The Jewish Sabbath that begins at sundown tonight will be a particularly significant one for thousands of observant Jews in a wide swath of Manhattan. Today marks a major, southward expansion of an eruv — a symbolic boundary that allows certain actions, like carrying things or pushing a stroller, which would otherwise be forbidden under Jewish law.

The eruv began on the Upper West Side in 1994 and was extended eastward, to the East River, in 2004. Until now, its southern boundary ran through the West and East 50s. About two years ago, a group of rabbis and congregations in Manhattan began discussing how to extend part of the eruv southward, to Houston Street between First and Sixth Avenues. That expansion takes effect today.

The expansion of the eruv involved stringing translucent fish wire across the tops of lampposts. The wire is high enough off the ground as to be virtually imperceptible to passers-by. (The wires in the original Upper West Side eruv were taken down each Thanksgiving to allow the giant Macy’s Thanksgiving Day Parade balloons to pass unimpeded.)

“We’ve been working with a team of rabbis who are experts not only in the Talmudic law but also in the practicalities of how to do it in a city,” said Rabbi Yehuda Sarna of the Edgar M. Bronfman Center for Jewish Student Life at New York University, a main organizer of the effort.

The cost of the expansion came to more than $100,000, raised from members of 11 participating congregations, from Congregation Adereth El (an Orthodox synagogue) to the Central Synagogue (a Reform temple), Rabbi Sarna said.

eruv mapIn this satellite image of Manhattan, the yellow line shows the boundaries of the old eruv and the red line represents its recent expansion. (Photo: Courtesy of Julia Weigensberg and Google Earth)

The eruv will be inspected once a week by a rabbi — “I guess you could basically call him the eruvitect,” Rabbi Sarna said — to confirm that the circuit is intact. If there is any problem, the rabbi will call a construction company to repair any frayed or toppled section of wire.

The expansion has generated considerable excitement.

“We’re all very proud — all Jews in this neighborhood are proud — to preserve the Jewish traditions,” said Rabbi Gideon Shloush of Congregation Adereth El, on East 29th Street, which has been active in the effort to extend the eruv. “It’s phenomenal. It’s something special and long-awaited.”

Because the Sabbath is a day of rest, activities like carrying, cooking or traveling are proscribed. An eruv (the term, meaning “mixture,” technically applies to an array of practices, not just a symbolic boundary) designates an entire area as “one domain,” or a shared space, according to Rabbi Sarna. “It domesticates the space, makes it like one home, where everyone is a family,” he said.

The expansion covers parts of Midtown and Greenwich Village, along with neighborhoods like Murray Hill and Gramercy Park. “Really what the construction of the eruv points to is the excitement around the growing Jewish presence in these areas,” Rabbi Sarna said. “Some of these areas the most hip and the most commercial in the city and the United States.”

As with any religious practice, however, the eruv is not universally recognized, even among observant Jews. As a Times article in March 2006 pointed out, the extension only goes south to Houston Street and does not extend into the Lower East Side – one of the historic centers of Jewish life in America — because some Orthodox rabbis there do not believe that Manhattan’s traffic patterns and street layout allow for valid eruvs.

Rabbi Sarna, while acknowledging that some rabbis do not acknowledge the eruv, said the process had brought together Jews of different movements and beliefs, noting that several Conservative and Reform congregations endorsed the effort.

“I always thought eruv was about Orthodox Jews who followed Shabbat very strictly gaining the ability to carry in certain areas,” he said. “But what I came to understand is that the Talmud says that the real reason the eruv was instituted was to open the ways to peace.”

Comments are no longer being accepted.

While I laud the “expansion” of the eruv, a more extensive history, going back to the first effort, can be found at:
//seforim.blogspot.com/2007/02/adam-mintz-manhattan-eruv.html

While I too laud the expansion, I regret that it cannot come down to a pocket of modern Orthodoxy on the Lower East Side because of a few remaining rabbis who adhere to a older rabbinic ruling that has since been reviewed and re-written since, to accommodate eruvin throughout just about everywhere else in Manhattan.

Right after this eruv was complete and Sewell wrote the article for the Times, the Lower East Side rabbinate, consisting of Rabbi David and Reuven Feinstein, sons of the late great Rav Moshe Feinstein, and a host of minor rabbis from ever dwindling shuls and shteebles, distributed a letter that states:

“We, the Rabbonim of the Lower East Side are reaffirming the issur (prohibition) of constructing an eruv in the Borough of Manhattan which was instated by HaGaon Rabbi Moshe Feisntein ZT”L and the Moetzes Gedolei HaTorah. In accordance with this ruling we oppose the making of an Eruv in our community, the Lower East Side of New York. Chazal teach us that by keeping Shabbos we will merit peace and harmony in our communities and it will bring the final redemption, may it be speedily in our days.”

This letter was written in both Hebrew and English, and was accompanied by the initial prohibition signed in the 1960s by Moshe Feinstein. The point they make here is that Moshe Feinstein, a recognized rabbinic giant and Talmudic scholar of the 20th Century, who saw issues clearly and interpreted Judaic law with prudence and human understanding, said at one point that eruvin could not exist in Manhattan. Yet since that initial ruling, many rabbis had consulted with him, sought his advice and found the relevant interpretations to erect the Manhattan eruv, the West Side eruv, the East Side Eruv and the Washington Heights Eruv, but these few remaining rabbis on the Lower East Side believe that while Rav Moshe was a Gadol Hador (a great man of his generation, presumably spanning the country and continents), his prohibition against eruvin in Manhattan is only applicable in a four block radius of Manhattan.

It is a humbling message to see a man of such greatness reduced to four blocks where the Jewish community has been dwindling as a result of the lack of Orthodox-amenities; and strange to me that his kin and followers would see the community he built, where his memory is strong, go dim, instead of finding the courage to build the eruv in his name and honor and revitalize the centers that once were hallowed by his presence.

The fact that there is money and drive to build eruvin around Manhattan show that Jewish families are still moving into the City, but not to the Lower East Side, the once hub for Judaism in America. Instead of imbecilic hollow letters that demonstrate no strength or rabbinic authority where authority once roared, two of the men who signed these renewed prohibitions can change the course of history.

I have no problem re: rabbis debating the validity of the Eruv. This is indeed a gray area.

Where I object, is that some rabbis want to IMPOSE their ruling on other rabbis. In that case, I feel those rabbis have over-stepped their bounds! Rathre they should simply state that all those who follow their authority should not avail themselves of the Eruv in question, and let it go at that. They have no right- in my humble opinion – to stop other rabbis from proceeding; espeically given the fact that they, too, rely upon valid authorities.

There must be a sense of mutual respect for differing opinions. And there are valid differences of opinion on these matters that are rooted in over 800 years of dispute on a several key factors.

Regards
Rabbi Richard Wolpoe

Today’s rabbis do not have the authority to uproot a ruling made in the previous generations, when it comes to matters of Shabbos desecration,which is one of the strongest laws that Jews must adhere toIf in doubt in matters like this,we do not have the power to be lenient.(emergencies are completely excepted )

Why not make satelites the edge of the Eruv or the atmosphere of the earth? This whole concept seems to be about circumventing the sabbath law, why follow it at all if you are only going to do so with these artificial borders, attempting to avoid the letter of the commandment? these are the sorts of excuses Christians use to keep what parts of Leviticus are fitting their agenda, like law against homosexuality, but then they eat a ham. Follow it or don’t follow it.
Only a perspective, do as you will.

More silly superstition.

Jacob – I agree with you. They are just pulling the wool over their own eyes. Hypocrites. Actions like these are what drive people away from organized religion. Christians do it (as you note), Muslims do it. I used to work at the consulate in Alex, Egypt and the Egyptian staff would quaff beers at the Marine house all the while reeling in horror from the pork-laden hot dogs. In Yemen, during Ramadan, a “fasting” taxi driver was drunk in the middle of the day. I lost all respect.

I agree completely with Jacob. The eruv is supposed to be an extension of your home? That way, when you are around your homestead on Sabbath, you are able to do practical things such as carrying something… but carrying groceries from midtown east to uptown west just because you have an “eruv” is like cheating yourself, and being in denial about what you’re actually doing… Why not put the eruv around the entire world, seriously… then you can do whatever you want on Sabbath… ridiculous…

I’m not Jewish but I don’t thing I have to be to understand what’s going on here… please correct me if I’m wrong…

No wonder why both of my grown up sons looking at such a sillyness have decided to set up their own boundaries of observance, e.g. what to eat, whom to date, etc. In other words, this artificial stretching of eruv although funny, actually inflicts some harm to the Jewish community at large.

I totally agree with Jacob (“Why not make…”). I didn’t know about eruvs. Sounds like a bad joke.

Regards,
Juan L.

Always with the artificial boundaries and using those to choose when something is acceptable and when it is not. We take what we can stomach and adjust what we cannot. Pure nonsense.

An article for ERC.

No offense intended, but isn’t the eruv just a wire? What connection is there between an arbitrary wire and following the Mosaic Law? It sure seems like an excuse to justify ignoring certain parts of the Mosaic Law — parts which are most troublesome.

Doesn’t that shake their faith in the Talmud? What if the Talmud said you could violate other portions of the Ten Commandments within that wire? At what point do you decide to go with the Mosaic Law itself, rather than some of the things that have been written about it?

Why not take a step back, and seek after G-d and His intent in setting up the Sabbath — a system that everyone seems to agree is next to impossible to fulfill. Why would a wise, loving Father do that? Perhaps to show us our universal sinfulness and need for His help? If G-d does show us mercy, which we obviously need, how is His divine justice satisfied? Think and pray and study about it. (What have we misunderstood so far?)

Isn’t the eruv the definition of a ghetto!!!!

what if a little chunk of street was brought into the house? then the entire paved world is your oyster, or surimi…

How many angels can dance on the head of a pin? Workarounds like this seem to have little to do with the spirit of the law.