l408 Final
l408 Final
Alyssa Owens
Dr. Power-Carter
L408
15 December 2019
Final Assignment
Part I:
As an educator it is clear to me that I have a tendency to be very forward and dominate
when facilitating student learning. In some instances, this works quite well, with my ability to be
direct ensuring students pay attention and maintain engagement. In the role of a teacher, there are
some very obvious drawbacks to being overtly direct, including some students finding me
intimidating. I think this natural tendency to lead discussion is useful in some instances, but for
individual student learning this quality is detrimental. I do, however, think that I can repurpose
this approach to my advantage, maintaining a strong presence in the classroom. I will have to
make sure that I reserve time for small groups and self-directed student activity in order to offset
My only real confidence issue so far has been not knowing where my authority ends and
begins. If my students are not respecting each other or are acting up, what can I do? If I were
but in this case I’m not sure that would be the best course of action, especially in a small group
setting. I attempted to redirect student’s attention or draw them back into the conversation by
using what they were talking about and applying it to the reading. This generally helped. But
occasionally these strategies just didn’t work and students would talk to each other about a
Owens 2
totally different topic without paying attention to the lesson. I think that I need to work to find
When it comes to meeting the needs of all learners, I attempt to attend as many
workshops as I possibly can that address student background/identity/ or current issues that could
affect my students. I firmly believe that understanding where your students come from and the
issues affecting them are the first step to figuring out how to best assist them in the classroom.
I’m most interested in how to help ELL students, and have attempted to have some knowledge of
a few different languages so that I can understand the general way different languages might be
structured. If I understand that English is structured as an SVO language but that Korean is a
SOV language, I can better help my Korean students learn English. Since I’ve studied a number
of languages, I know various grammatical structures and can format my assignments to better
explain grammar and verb usage per each student’s native language. Any IEP students in my
classroom will obviously need more individualized attention, though I am already preparing to
provide audio books and visual aids for students generally, since each student learns differently
and will benefit from a variety of lesson aids. I also think that providing audio books will
encourage students to ‘read’ more, since many students find the act of reading itself to be
burdensome. I will also be taking a class next fall that focuses in on how to best help IEP
students in a secondary classroom. Because this isn’t a mandatory part of my program, I will
hone in on my blind spots as much as possible to help prepare for a multitude of eventualities.
I strongly value teaching about social justice issues and also want to emphasize the
importance of context and facts in relation to modern news media. While I have very strong
opinions, this class has made it clear to me that my own classroom is not necessarily the place to
exercise that interest. While I can easily justify talking about different topics, I have to keep in
Owens 3
mind that my students (and their parents) might have different opinions. This shouldn’t prohibit
me from talking about controversial topics, but I should definitely exercise caution. I definitely
want to push my students to confront their own biases and be uncomfortable, but I also need to
A majority of the theory that I ascribe to changes depending on my class and their
learning style. I certainly believe in a more relaxed classroom management style, and don’t
foresee that changing. As for learning theory I am most interested in applying both deductive and
inductive language learning into my classrooms to see which is most effective for each group of
students. Because the inductive method relies primarily on context to learn a language and I
personally learn better from the deductive method, which tells students directly how different
language constructions work, I will have to experiment to find a balance that works with my own
teaching style.
The curricular challenge that I most anticipate is a frustration with required readings. I’ve
always wanted to emphasize world literatures, especially at higher grade levels, but it just simply
isn’t practical to have students read dense pieces like The Tale of Genji, especially at the high
school level. This, combined with a curriculum that values Western literature more than any
other, will likely cause me a lot of frustration. More practically, this class has taught me that
students do not read. Occasionally they do, but it is very difficult to teach a lesson when one
student has finished the book and the rest are still on the first half (if they have even started at
all). I will likely do a lot of in-class reading with my students, especially sophomores and below.
By providing alternative reading methods (audio books) I will also hopefully encourage students
To make my classroom more equitable I will likely make very clear signs and symbols
that tell students they are welcome. At the beginning of each rotation, I am planning on
providing students with a questionnaire that asks for preferred pronouns, anything I should
know, how best they learn and any accommodations they might need, what ticks they may have
(e.g. they need to get up and walk every half hour), etc. So much of my future classrooms
effectiveness will depend on my knowing my students, so giving out this paper on the first day
will both let students know that they are listened to while also allowing me to get to know my
students quickly (and avoid any potential embarrassment they might feel in coming to me
personally). The emphasis on preferred learning strategies will also allow me to make lesson
More than anything, I think I need to have a more open mindset concerning what
literature can be used to teach. While I value classics and also appreciate young adult literature, I
have to admit that I am biased towards classical literature. The difficulty level of the material
combined with the writing style often made me feel that classical literature (with few exceptions)
is what should be used to teach English literature. After reading books like The Sun is Also a
Star, I can understand how using a more ‘relaxed’ novel could assist in teaching, especially since
students are more likely to engage with it than a heavier book that discusses immigration or
family abuse. If students are actively involved and still engaging with the topic of immigration, it
Part II:
Maus Pt. 1
Owens 5
Materials/Resources: 8 pieces of paper w/ comic panels and instructions, colored pencils, copies
Learning Objectives:
Students will be able to write in comic/graphic novel format
Students will use word association to understand animal metaphors in Maus
Students will demonstrate an understanding of autobiography through their writing
Discussion questions:
1. How does the “comic book” formatting influence the story for you personally?
2. How do you usually picture things in your head when you read a “normal novel”? Do you
miss that process with a book like Maus?
Owens 6
3. Would you consider Vladek your average “hero”? Why or why not?
4. What do you think of the use of the “cat and mouse” archetype? Do you think it’s
appropriate to describe something like the holocaust?
Trouble Shooting: In the case of the copy machine not working, students will be able to access
the appropriate documents online. Students will then draw out the comic panels on their own. In
the case of technology being inaccessible, we will go around the room and do popcorn reading
and then discuss each chapter.
Technology Used: No technology required.
Materials/Resources:
Article for bias activity (we will print off enough copies for each student):
https://nypost.com/2019/10/03/why-college-athletes-deserve-a-piece-of-the-action/
Bulls-eye target for bias activity
Copies of The Long Road Home for all students and teachers
Overview/Purpose: To understand the distinction between facts and opinion and identify author
bias
Learning Objectives:
Students will be able to identify bias in a work
Students will understand what counts as a reliable source
Students will discuss how bias shapes a narrative
Standards Addressed:
11-12.RN.3.3 Determine an author’s perspective or purpose in a text in which the rhetoric is
particularly effective (e.g., appeals to both friendly and hostile audiences, anticipates and
addresses reader concerns and counterclaims), analyzing how style and content contribute to the
power, persuasiveness or beauty of the text.
Owens 7
11-12.RN.4.1 Delineate and evaluate the argument and specific claims in seminal U.S. and world
texts, assessing whether the reasoning is valid and the evidence is relevant and sufficient;
identify false statements and fallacious reasoning
4. P. 14 “This must be how Custer felt just before the Battle of Little
Bighorn...everyone they encountered had voiced disdain for the
Americans…”
Modifications/Accommodations: We will read the articles out loud in order to help ELL and
visually impaired learners. A braille/translated/or audiobook addition of The Long Road Home
will also be provided.
Troubleshooting: If unable to get copies of the article students will be allowed to access the
additional readings on their phones/tablets/laptops. If completely unable to access the additional
materials, we will launch directly into discussion of the book. If students are confused after the
bias activity, more time will be spent to focus in on that particular topic.
Part III:
“Critical Conversations on Whiteness With Young Adult Literature” drove home how we
often make the mistake of teaching about diversity without fully explaining why different
minority groups are classified as minorities in the first place. While an ongoing process this
semester, I made several attempts to confront the lens of whiteness and the power structures that
are unspoken that make whiteness the default in most literary works. My first attempt at getting
students to think about these structures was with The Long Road Home, where the author
(Raddatz) often explicitly mentioned a character’s skin color only if they were black. Her writing
felt problematic in other instances, where she felt they need to emphasize the vulnerability of
women. Our bias activity that preceded discussion of the book was meant to get students to think
about why an author chooses to portray something a specific way, and to demonstrate the
implicit biases we carry into our writing. By using this lens, I feel that students achieved a deeper
understanding of the material by thinking about author motivation and viewing the author’s
Owens 9
voice as biased, regardless of the amount of objectivism that they may try to insert into their
writing. I used a similar technique with our second Maus lesson plan, using a majority of our
lesson to read supplemental texts explaining more about what genocide truly means and the
motivations behind it. I specifically chose to do this after hearing a couple of my students
express a frustration with the material, saying that it didn’t apply to them. Through this
additional reading and discussion, we tried to show just how applicable the material was, since
genocide is a result of power structures (often white) that oppress people physically and
culturally.
I also admit a certain unwillingness early in the class to use young adult literature at all.
While I enjoy reading young adult literature and it is the reason for my reading habits, like many
of the teachers in “Young Adult Literature: Young Adult Novels in the Classroom?” I felt that
students would not be exposed to true “literature” unless they were forced to read those novels in
a classroom setting. I also am often overwhelmed when considering the number of classical
novels that students should read, so the idea of taking away more time to focus on a less
culturally impactful work caused me a lot of stress. However, after reading the article and
understanding how much of an impact young adult literature made in my own life, I began to see
the use it could serve in a classroom setting. The Sun is Also a Star is a fantastic example of a
book I wouldn’t have considered prior to reading the article, but after reading it myself and
seeing how it addressed a number of difficult topics like immigration, family abuse, and complex
racial relations in the United States, I could easily see how it would allow for a deeper dive into
the topics it briefly mentions. With A Long Road Home, I felt similarly: that the book was an
inferior representation of many of the issues of family and violence it attempted to confront.
Owens 10
However, after seeing how students engaged with the material it was made clear that use of
young adult literature engages in a way that classical literature might not.
Part IV:
particularly from areas that are overlooked in a traditional education (Africa, the Middle East,
Asia). I also want to emphasize how privilege changes the way we view the world, and help
students understand different viewpoints, and the distinction between equality and equity. I want
my students to walk away with an ability to identify bias and think critically about information
they are given so that they are able to fully participate in society as well-informed citizens.
My classroom will be a place where students can fully participate, feeling safe and able to
express their opinions and debate different topics. Because so much of my ideal curriculum will
feature likely controversial material, I want students to feel safe enough to express opinions that
are contrary to material I may give. Since critical thinking means you will likely disagree with
material or lack of nuance in a piece of literature, students should feel they are able to speak up