0% found this document useful (0 votes)
2K views4 pages

Complaint: California vs. Alexander Hoch

The document is a felony complaint against Alexander Francis Hoch for multiple counts of making threats against Sacramento City Council members Katie Valenzuela and Karina Talamantes, as well as Mary Yang. The charges include violations of California Penal Code Sections 76(a) and 422, alleging that Hoch unlawfully threatened their lives and safety on November 10, 2022. The complaint is filed in the Superior Court of California, Sacramento County, and includes a holding order for the defendant to answer to the charges.

Uploaded by

ABC10
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
2K views4 pages

Complaint: California vs. Alexander Hoch

The document is a felony complaint against Alexander Francis Hoch for multiple counts of making threats against Sacramento City Council members Katie Valenzuela and Karina Talamantes, as well as Mary Yang. The charges include violations of California Penal Code Sections 76(a) and 422, alleging that Hoch unlawfully threatened their lives and safety on November 10, 2022. The complaint is filed in the Superior Court of California, Sacramento County, and includes a holding order for the defendant to answer to the charges.

Uploaded by

ABC10
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

1

2 ANNE MARIE SCHUBERT SPD-22-316946


3 DISTRICT ATTORNEY FILED
Superior Court of California
4 901 G STREET TEAM: 62/TH (TT2)
Sacramento
5 SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 11115/2022 (IC) 11/15/2022
Electronically Filed
6 (916) 874-6218 Case Number:
7 22FE018884

8 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA


9 COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO
10
11 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OFCALIFORNIA, No.
12 .,.. FELONY COMPLAINT
13
vs.
14
15
ALEXANDER FRANCIS H
16
Defendant.
17
18
The People of the State of California upon oath of the undersigned, upon information and belief
19
complain against the defendant above named for the cri~e(s) as follows:
20
21
22 COUNT ONE
23 On or about November 10, 2022, at and in the County of Sacramento, State of California, the
24 defendant, ALEXANDER FRANCIS HOCH, did commit a felony, namely: a violation of
25 Section 76(a) of the Penal Code of the State of California, in that said defendant did willingly,
26 .....
unlawfully and knowingly threaten the life of, and threaten serious bodily harm to KATIE
27
VALENZUELA, a member of the Sacramento City Council, and KARINA TALAMANTES, a
28
29 candidate for Sacramento City Council and a staff member to Sacramento City Council Member

30 Angelique Ashby, with the intent that the statement be taken as a threat and with the apparent
31 ability to carry out that threat.
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40 1 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
41 1303950
1
2
3 COUNTTWO
4 For a further and separate cause of action, being a different offense of the same class of crimes
5 and offenses and connected in its commission with the charges set forth in Count One hereof: On
6 or about November 10, 2022, at and in the County of Sacramento, State of California, the
7 defendant, ALEXANDER FRANCIS HOCH, did commit a fe lony, namely: a violation of
8 Section 422 of the Penal Code of the State of California, in that said defendant did willfully and
9 unlawfully threaten to commit a crime which would result in death and great bodily injury to
10 KATIE VALENZUELA and KARINA TALAMANTES, with the specific ntent that the
11 statement be taken as a threat.
12
13 It is further alleged that the threatened crime, on its face and under the circumstances in which it
14 was made, was so unequivocal, unconditional, immediate and specific as to convey to KATIE
15 VALENZUELA and KARINA TALAMANTES a gravity of purpose and an irnn1ediate prospect
16 of execution.
17
18
It is further alleged that the said victim, KATIE VALENZUELA and KARINA TALAMANTES ,
19
was reasonably in sustained fear of his/her safety and the safety of his/her immediate family.
20
21
COUNT THREE
22
For a further and separate cause of action, being a different offense of the same class of crimes
23
and offenses and connected in its commission with the charges set forth in Counts One and Two
24
hereof: On or about November 10, 2022, at and in the County of Sacramento, State of California,
25
the defendant, ALEXANDER FRANCIS HOCH, did commit a felony, namely: a violation of
26
Section 76(a) of the Penal Code of the State of California, in that said defendant did willingly,
27
unlawfully and knowingly threaten the life of, and threaten serious bodily harm to MAl YANG,
28
who was elected to the Sacramento City Council, with the intent that the statement be taken as a
29
threat and with the apparent ability to carry out that threat.
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40 2 1111111111111111111111111111111111111 11111111
41 1303950
1
2
3 I declare upon information and belief and under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and
4 correct.
5
6 Executed at Sacramento County, California, the 15th day ofNovember, 2022.
7
8
9
10
11 CHARLES GONZALEZ
12 SACRAMENTO COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY
13 (916) 874-6218
14 Telephone Number
15 CB

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40 3 1111111111111111111111 11111 111111111111111111

41 1303950
1
2
3 HOLDING ORDER
4
5 _ _ It appearing to me that the offense(s) in the within complaint has/have been committed,
6 and that there is sufficient cause to believe that the defendant, ALEXANDER FRANCIS
7 HOCH, is guilty thereof,
8 _ _ The defendant, ALEXANDER FRANCIS HOCH, having waived preliminary hearing to
9 the offense(s) set forth in this complaint,
10
11 Exceptions/Additions/Conditions: - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - -- - -
12
13
14
15 I order that the defendant be held to answer to same. In my capacity as Judge of the Superior
16 Court, I deem the within complaint to be an Information and order it fi led in the Superior Court.
17
18 Date: _ _ _ _ _ Dept: _ __
19
Judge of the Superior Court Sitting as Magistrate
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40 4 1111111111111111111111 11111111111111111111111
41 1303950

You might also like