Add JSpecify annotations to 10 language package classes#4218
Open
Add JSpecify annotations to 10 language package classes#4218
Conversation
Co-authored-by: dondonz <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: dondonz <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: dondonz <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: dondonz <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: dondonz <[email protected]>
Copilot
AI
changed the title
[WIP] Add JSpecify annotations to 10 classes in graphql.language package
Add JSpecify annotations to 10 language package classes
Jan 25, 2026
# Conflicts: # .claude/commands/jspecify-annotate.md
Contributor
Contributor
Test Results 335 files ±0 335 suites ±0 5m 5s ⏱️ ±0s Results for commit 72ea92a. ± Comparison against base commit 89b4446. This pull request removes 204 and adds 180 tests. Note that renamed tests count towards both.This pull request skips 1 test.♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results. |
dondonz
reviewed
Feb 15, 2026
dondonz
reviewed
Feb 15, 2026
| Note that JSpecify is already used in this repository so it's already imported. | ||
|
|
||
| If you see a builder static class, you can label it `@NullUnmarked` and not need to do anymore for this static class in terms of annotations. | ||
| **IMPORTANT: Builder classes MUST be annotated with `@NullUnmarked`.** When you encounter a `public static final class Builder` or `public static class Builder` inside a `@NullMarked` class, you MUST: |
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
A number of builder annotations were missed, so I've updated the prompt
Interesting there is a difference between "you can" and "you must" for LLMs
Member
|
Item for discussion - this now enforces a selection set on fragment definition (as per spec), and now requires fields to have a name |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Annotates 10 classes in
graphql.languagepackage with JSpecify nullability annotations and removes them from the exemption list.Annotated Classes
Approach
Field nullability: Core fields (name, type, typeCondition) are marked
@Nullableto allow test code to create incomplete instances for validation testing.Getter enforcement: Getters use
assertNotNull()to satisfy NamedNode contract and fail fast:Builder leniency: Builders accept nullable values without validation, supporting existing test patterns that create invalid AST nodes.
List copying: deepCopy() methods use
assertNotNull()on list results since AbstractNode'sdeepCopy(List)returns@Nullable List.Original prompt
This pull request was created from Copilot chat.
✨ Let Copilot coding agent set things up for you — coding agent works faster and does higher quality work when set up for your repo.