Skip to content

Conversation

@def-
Copy link
Contributor

@def- def- commented Dec 31, 2025

Seen in https://buildkite.com/materialize/nightly/builds/14627

#34628 seems not to have been the root cause

Test run: https://buildkite.com/materialize/nightly/builds/14628

Checklist

  • This PR has adequate test coverage / QA involvement has been duly considered. (trigger-ci for additional test/nightly runs)
  • This PR has an associated up-to-date design doc, is a design doc (template), or is sufficiently small to not require a design.
  • If this PR evolves an existing $T ⇔ Proto$T mapping (possibly in a backwards-incompatible way), then it is tagged with a T-proto label.
  • If this PR will require changes to cloud orchestration or tests, there is a companion cloud PR to account for those changes that is tagged with the release-blocker label (example).
  • If this PR includes major user-facing behavior changes, I have pinged the relevant PM to schedule a changelog post.

@def- def- requested review from bobbyiliev and bosconi December 31, 2025 09:19
@def- def- requested a review from a team as a code owner December 31, 2025 09:19
@def- def- merged commit 50b0df3 into MaterializeInc:main Dec 31, 2025
326 of 336 checks passed
@def- def- deleted the pr-command-cleanup branch December 31, 2025 11:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants