ÐÐ°Ñ ÑелеÑон ÑкоÑо пеÑеÑÑане бÑÑи ваÑим
ÐоÑинаÑÑи з веÑеÑÐ½Ñ 2026, ÑÐ¸Ñ Ðµ оновленнÑ, без згоди запÑÑене Google, заблокÑÑ Ð²ÑÑ Android додаÑки ÑÐ¸Ñ ÑозÑобники не заÑеÑÑÑÑÑвалиÑÑ Ð² Google, Ñ Ð½Ðµ пÑдпиÑали з ними конÑÑакÑ, Ñ Ð½Ðµ ÑплаÑили Ñм за його...
Ðожен додаÑок Ñ ÐºÐ¾Ð¶ÐµÐ½ пÑиÑÑÑÑй Ñ ÑвÑÑÑ, без можливоÑÑÑ Ð²ÑдмовиÑиÑÑ
↓Що Google ÑобиÑÑ
Ð ÑеÑÐ¿Ð½Ñ 2025, Google оголоÑив Ð½Ð¾Ð²Ñ Ð²Ð¸Ð¼Ð¾Ð³Ð¸: поÑинаÑÑи Ñз веÑеÑÐ½Ñ 2026, кожен ÑозÑобник Android додаÑкÑв Ð¼Ð°Ñ Ð·Ð°ÑеÑÑÑÑÑваÑиÑÑ Ð² ÑенÑÑалÑзованÑй ÑиÑÑÐµÐ¼Ñ Google, пеÑед Ñим Ñк ÑÑ Ð½Ñ Ð¿ÑогÑамне забезпеÑÐµÐ½Ð½Ñ Ð·Ð¼Ð¾Ð¶Ðµ бÑÑи вÑÑановленим на бÑдÑ-Ñкий пÑиÑÑÑÑй. Ðе лиÑе Ð´Ð»Ñ Play Store додаÑкÑв: Ð´Ð»Ñ Ð²ÑÑÑ Ð´Ð¾Ð´Ð°ÑкÑв. Це вклÑÑÐ°Ñ Ð´Ð¾Ð´Ð°Ñки поÑиÑÑÐ²Ð°Ð½Ñ Ð¼Ñж дÑÑзÑми, ÑозповÑÑджÑÐ²Ð°Ð½Ñ ÑеÑез F-Droid, ÑÑвоÑÐµÐ½Ñ ÐµÐ½ÑÑзÑаÑÑами Ð´Ð»Ñ Ð²Ð»Ð°Ñного викоÑиÑÑаннÑ. ÐÐµÐ·Ð°Ð»ÐµÐ¶Ð½Ñ ÑозÑобники, ÑеÑÐºÐ¾Ð²Ð½Ñ Ñ Ð³ÑомадÑÑÐºÑ Ð¾ÑганÑзаÑÑÑ, енÑÑзÑаÑÑи бÑдÑÑÑ Ð¿Ð¾Ð·Ð±Ð°Ð²Ð»ÐµÐ½Ñ Ð¼Ð¾Ð¶Ð»Ð¸Ð²Ð¾ÑÑÑ ÑозÑоблÑÑи Ñ ÑозповÑÑджÑваÑи ÑÐ²Ð¾Ñ Ð¿ÑогÑами.
РегÑÑÑÑаÑÑÑ Ð¿ÐµÑедбаÑаÑ:
- СплаÑÐµÐ½Ð½Ñ ÐºÐ¾Ð¼ÑÑÑÑ Google
- ÐÐ¾Ð³Ð¾Ð´Ð¶ÐµÐ½Ð½Ñ Ñз Умовами викоÑиÑÑаннÑ Google
- ÐÐ°Ð´Ð°Ð½Ð½Ñ Ð´ÐµÑжавного поÑвÑдÑÐµÐ½Ð½Ñ Ð¾Ñоби
- ÐабезпеÑÐµÐ½Ð½Ñ Ð´Ð¾ÐºÐ°Ð·Ñв пÑо наÑвнÑÑÑÑ Ñ Ð²Ð°Ñ Ð²Ð°Ñого пÑиваÑного клÑÑа пÑдпиÑÑ
- ÐеÑелÑк ÑÑÑÑ Ð¿Ð¾ÑоÑÐ½Ð¸Ñ Ñ Ð¼Ð°Ð¹Ð±ÑÑнÑÑ ÑнденÑиÑÑкаÑоÑÑв додаÑкÑв
ЯкÑо ÑозÑобник не бÑде доÑÑимÑваÑиÑÑ ÑÐ¸Ñ Ð²Ð¸Ð¼Ð¾Ð³, його додаÑки бÑдÑÑÑ ÑÐ¸Ñ Ð¾ Ð·Ð°Ð±Ð»Ð¾ÐºÐ¾Ð²Ð°Ð½Ñ Ð½Ð° ÐºÐ¾Ð¶Ð½Ð¾Ð¼Ñ Android пÑиÑÑÑÐ¾Ñ Ð² ÑвÑÑÑ
Ðого Ñе ÑÑоÑÑÑÑÑÑÑ
ÐаÑ
Ðи пÑидбали ÑелеÑон на Android, бо Google запевнÑв, Ñо ÑÑ Ð¿Ð»Ð°ÑÑоÑма Ñ Ð²ÑдкÑиÑоÑ. Ðи могли вÑÑановлÑваÑи вÑе, Ñо забажаÑÑе - оÑÑ Ñ ÑÐ¾Ð¼Ñ Ð¿Ð¾Ð»Ñгала ÑÑÑÑ.
ÐаÑаз Google пеÑеглÑÐ´Ð°Ñ Ñмови ÑÑÑÑ Ñгоди, поÑиÑÑÑÑи ÑÑ Ð½Ð° пÑиÑÑÑоÑ, Ñке ви вже маÑÑе. ÐÑÑÐ»Ñ Ð¾Ð½Ð¾Ð²Ð»ÐµÐ½Ð½Ñ Ð²Ð¸ зможеÑе викоÑиÑÑовÑваÑи лиÑе ÑÑ Ð´Ð¾Ð´Ð°Ñки, Ñке попеÑеднÑо ÑÑ Ð²Ð°Ð»Ð¸Ð»Ð° Google. Ðа ваÑÐ¾Ð¼Ñ ÑелеÑÐ¾Ð½Ñ - ваÑÑй влаÑноÑÑÑ, за ÑÐºÑ Ð²Ð¸ заплаÑили.
ÐÐµÐ·Ð°Ð»ÐµÐ¶Ð½Ñ ÑозÑобникÑв
ÐеÑÑий додаÑок пÑдлÑÑка, ÑнÑÑÑÑÐ¼ÐµÐ½Ñ Ð´Ð»Ñ Ð·Ð°Ñ Ð¸ÑÑÑ Ð¿ÑиваÑноÑÑÑ, ÑÑвоÑений волонÑеÑом, Ñи конÑÑденÑÑйна внÑÑÑÑÑÐ½Ñ Ð±ÐµÑа-веÑÑÑÑ Ð´Ð¾Ð´Ð°ÑÐºÑ ÐºÐ¾Ð¼Ð¿Ð°Ð½ÑÑ. Ðе Ð¼Ð°Ñ Ð·Ð½Ð°ÑеннÑ. ÐÑÑÐ»Ñ Ð²ÐµÑеÑÐ½Ñ 2026 ÑÐ¾ÐºÑ Ð¶Ð¾Ð´ÐµÐ½ Ñз Ð½Ð¸Ñ Ð½Ðµ можна бÑде вÑÑановиÑи без Ð´Ð¾Ð·Ð²Ð¾Ð»Ñ Google.
F-Droid, домÑка Ð´Ð»Ñ ÑиÑÑÑÑ Ð²ÑлÑÐ½Ð¸Ñ Ñа вÑдкÑиÑÐ¸Ñ Ð´Ð¾Ð´Ð°ÑкÑв Ð´Ð»Ñ Android, назвала Ñе загÑÐ¾Ð·Ð¾Ñ ÑÑнÑваннÑ. ÐоÑÑ ÐокÑоÑов Ð½Ð°Ð·Ð¸Ð²Ð°Ñ ÑÑ "ÐаÑÑ-Android".
УÑÑдÑв Ñа гÑомадÑÑÐºÐ¸Ñ Ð¾ÑганÑзаÑÑй
ÐомпанÑÑ Google Ð¼Ð°Ñ Ð´Ð¾ÐºÑменÑалÑно пÑдÑвеÑÐ´Ð¶ÐµÐ½Ñ Ð¿ÑакÑÐ¸ÐºÑ Ð²Ð¸ÐºÐ¾Ð½Ð°Ð½Ð½Ñ Ð²Ð¸Ð¼Ð¾Ð³ авÑоÑиÑаÑÐ½Ð¸Ñ ÑежимÑв Ñодо Ð²Ð¸Ð´Ð°Ð»ÐµÐ½Ð½Ñ Ð´Ð¾Ð´Ð°ÑкÑв. У ÑÐ°Ð¼ÐºÐ°Ñ ÑÑÑÑ Ð¿ÑогÑами, пÑогÑамне забезпеÑеннÑ, на ÑÐºÐ¾Ð¼Ñ Ð¿ÑаÑÑÑÑÑ Ð´ÐµÑÐ¶Ð°Ð²Ð½Ñ ÑÑÑанови ваÑÐ¾Ñ ÐºÑаÑни, бÑде залежаÑи вÑд пÑÐ¸Ð¼Ñ Ð¾Ð´Ð½ÑÑÑ-ÑÐ´Ð¸Ð½Ð¾Ñ ÑÐ½Ð¾Ð·ÐµÐ¼Ð½Ð¾Ñ ÐºÐ¾ÑпоÑаÑÑÑ, Ñка не неÑе Ð¶Ð¾Ð´Ð½Ð¾Ñ Ð²ÑдповÑдалÑноÑÑÑ.
EFF Ð½Ð°Ð·Ð¸Ð²Ð°Ñ ÐºÐ¾Ð½ÑÑÐ¾Ð»Ñ Ð´Ð¾ÑÑÑÐ¿Ñ Ð´Ð¾ додаÑкÑв «ÑлÑÑ Ð¾Ð¼, Ñо поÑÑÑйно ÑозÑиÑÑÑÑÑÑÑ Ð´Ð¾ ÑензÑÑи в ÐнÑеÑнеÑÑ».
«ШлÑÑ Ð´Ð¾ поÑÑÑÑнкÑ» вÑд Google виÑвивÑÑ Ð¿Ð°ÑÑкоÑ
Google заÑвлÑÑ, Ñо «доÑвÑдÑÐµÐ½Ñ ÐºÐ¾ÑиÑÑÑваÑÑ» можÑÑÑ Â«Ñк Ñ ÑанÑÑе» вÑÑановлÑваÑи непеÑевÑÑÐµÐ½Ñ Ð¿ÑогÑами. ÐÑÑ Ñк Ñе наÑпÑÐ°Ð²Ð´Ñ Ð²Ð¸Ð³Ð»ÑдаÑ:
- ÐайдÑÑÑ Ñ Ð½Ð°Ð»Ð°ÑÑÑÐ²Ð°Ð½Ð½Ñ ÑиÑÑеми Ñа знайдÑÑÑ ÑоздÑл «ÐаÑамеÑÑи ÑозÑобника»
- ÐаÑиÑнÑÑÑ Ð½Ð° Ð½Ð¾Ð¼ÐµÑ Ð·Ð±ÑÑки ÑÑм ÑазÑв, Ñоб ÑвÑмкнÑÑи Ñежим ÑозÑобника
- ÐакÑийÑе попеÑеджÑвалÑÐ½Ñ ÐµÐºÑани пÑо змÑÑеннÑ
- ÐведÑÑÑ ÑвÑй PIN-код
- ÐеÑезапÑÑÑÑÑÑ Ð¿ÑиÑÑÑÑй
- ÐаÑекайÑе 24 години
- ÐовеÑнÑÑÑÑÑ, закÑийÑе ÑнÑÑ Ð¿Ð¾Ð¿ÐµÑеджÑвалÑÐ½Ñ ÐµÐºÑани
- ÐибеÑÑÑÑ Â«Ð´Ð¾Ð·Ð²Ð¾Ð»Ð¸Ñи ÑимÑаÑово» (7 днÑв) або «дозволиÑи безÑÑÑоково»
- Ще Ñаз пÑдÑвеÑдÑÑе, Ñо ви ÑозÑмÑÑÑе «Ñизики»
Ðев'ÑÑÑ ÐºÑокÑв. Ðбов'Ñзковий 24-годинний пеÑÑод оÑÑкÑваннÑ. ÐÐ»Ñ Ð²ÑÑÐ°Ð½Ð¾Ð²Ð»ÐµÐ½Ð½Ñ Ð´Ð¾Ð´Ð°ÑкÑв на пÑиÑÑÑÑй, Ñкий належиÑÑ Ð²Ð°Ð¼.
ÐÑÑÑе Ñого: Ñей алгоÑиÑм повнÑÑÑÑ Ð¿ÑаÑÑÑ ÑеÑез СеÑвÑÑи Google Play, а не ÑеÑез ÐС Android. Google може його змÑниÑи, поÑилиÑи або Ð²Ð·Ð°Ð³Ð°Ð»Ñ Ð²Ð¸Ð¼ÐºÐ½ÑÑи в бÑдÑ-Ñкий моменÑ, без Ð½ÐµÐ¾Ð±Ñ ÑдноÑÑÑ Ð¾Ð½Ð¾Ð²Ð»ÐµÐ½Ð½Ñ ÐС Ñа без бÑдÑ-ÑÐºÐ¾Ñ Ð·Ð³Ð¾Ð´Ð¸. Рна ÑÑогоднÑÑнÑй Ð´ÐµÐ½Ñ Ð²Ñн не бÑв ÑеалÑзований Ñ Ð¶Ð¾Ð´Ð½Ñй беÑа-, попеÑеднÑй або ÑеÑÑовÑй веÑÑÑÑ. ÐÑн ÑÑнÑÑ Ð»Ð¸Ñе Ñ Ð²Ð¸Ð³Ð»ÑÐ´Ñ Ð¿ÑблÑкаÑÑÑ Ð² Ð±Ð»Ð¾Ð·Ñ Ñа кÑлÑÐºÐ¾Ñ Ð¼Ð°ÐºÐµÑÑв.
Це бÑлÑÑе, нÑж пÑоÑÑо Android
ЯкÑо Google вдаÑÑÑÑÑ Ð¿ÑоÑÑо взÑÑи Ñ Ð·Ð°Ð±Ð»Ð¾ÐºÑваÑи мÑлÑÑÑди пÑиÑÑÑоÑв, ÑÐºÑ Ð¾Ð±ÑÑÑли бÑÑи вÑдкÑиÑими, - Ñе ÑÑане Ñигналом Ð´Ð»Ñ ÐºÐ¾Ð¶Ð½Ð¾Ð³Ð¾ виÑобника Ð¾Ð±Ð»Ð°Ð´Ð½Ð°Ð½Ð½Ñ Ñ ÑвÑÑÑ.
ÐÑÑановлÑÑÑÑÑÑ Ð¿ÑинÑип: компанÑÑ-виÑобник ваÑого пÑиÑÑÑÐ¾Ñ Ð¾Ð´Ð½Ð¾Ð¾ÑÑбно виÑÑÑÑÑ Ð²Ð¶Ðµ пÑÑÐ»Ñ Ð¿Ð¾ÐºÑпки, Ñке пÑогÑамне забезпеÑÐµÐ½Ð½Ñ Ð²Ð°Ð¼ дозволено запÑÑкаÑи. У ÑндÑÑÑÑÑÑ Ñе називаÑÑÑ Â«Ð²Ð¸Ð±Ð¸Ð²Ð°Ð½Ð½Ñм ÒÑÑнÑÑ Ð·-пÑд нÑг» (rug pull); але Ñам ви пÑÐ¸Ð½Ð°Ð¹Ð¼Ð½Ñ Ð·Ð°Ð²Ð¶Ð´Ð¸ могли вÑÑановиÑи пÑогÑамне забезпеÑÐµÐ½Ð½Ñ Ð²Ñд конкÑÑенÑÑв. У Ð²Ð¸Ð¿Ð°Ð´ÐºÑ Ð· «залÑзом» - Ñе fait accompli (доконаний ÑакÑ), Ñкий позбавлÑÑ Ð²Ð°Ñ ÑÑб'ÑкÑноÑÑÑ Ñа ÑобиÑÑ Ð±ÐµÐ·Ñилими пеÑед пÑÐ¸Ð¼Ñ Ð°Ð¼Ð¸ Ñдиного непÑдзвÑÑного конÑÑолеÑа доÑÑÑÐ¿Ñ Ñа визнаного монополÑÑÑа.
ÐÑдкÑиÑÑÑÑÑ Android нÑколи не бÑла пÑоÑÑо однÑÑÑ Ð· ÑÑнкÑÑй. Це бÑла обÑÑÑнка, Ñка вÑдÑÑзнÑла його вÑд iPhone. Саме з ÑÑÑÑ Ð¿ÑиÑини мÑлÑйони лÑдей обÑали Android. ÐаÑаз Google в одноÑÑоÑоннÑÐ¾Ð¼Ñ Ð¿Ð¾ÑÑÐ´ÐºÑ Ð¿Ð¾ÑÑÑÑÑ ÑÑ Ð¾Ð±ÑÑÑÐ½ÐºÑ Ñодо пÑиÑÑÑоÑв, ÑÐºÑ Ð²Ð¶Ðµ Ð·Ð½Ð°Ñ Ð¾Ð´ÑÑÑÑÑ Ñ ÐºÐ¸ÑенÑÑ ÐºÐ¾ÑиÑÑÑваÑÑв, оÑкÑлÑки компанÑÑ Ð²Ð¸ÑÑÑила, Ñо ÑÑ Ð´Ð¾Ð¼ÑнÑÐ²Ð°Ð½Ð½Ñ Ð½Ð° ÑÐ¸Ð½ÐºÑ Ñа вплив на ÑегÑлÑÑоÑÐ½Ñ Ð¾Ñгани доÑÑаÑнÑ, Ñоб ÑникнÑÑи вÑдповÑдалÑноÑÑÑ.
Ars Technica: «ÐаздÑÑÑÑÑ Google до Apple загÑожÑÑ Ð·ÑÑйнÑваÑи ÑÑадиÑÑÑ Ð²ÑдкÑиÑоÑÑÑ Android.»
ÐаÑекайÑе, але Ñе не...
«...пÑоÑÑо пÑо безпекÑ?»
ÐÑгÑменÑи Ñодо безпеки - Ñе лиÑе пÑикÑиÑÑÑ. Google Play Protect Ñ Ñак пеÑевÑÑÑÑ Ð¿ÑогÑами на наÑвнÑÑÑÑ ÑкÑдливого ÐРнезалежно вÑд оÑоби ÑозÑобника. Ðимога надаÑи паÑпоÑÑ Ð½Ðµ ÑобиÑÑ ÐºÐ¾Ð´ безпеÑнÑÑим. Це ÑобиÑÑ ÑозÑобникÑв ÑденÑиÑÑкованими Ñа конÑÑолÑованими. ÐвÑоÑи ÑкÑÐ´Ð»Ð¸Ð²Ð¸Ñ Ð´Ð¾Ð´Ð°ÑкÑв можÑÑÑ Ð·Ð°ÑеÑÑÑÑÑваÑиÑÑ. ÐÐµÐ·Ð°Ð»ÐµÐ¶Ð½Ñ ÑозÑобники Ñа Ð½ÐµÐ·Ð³Ð¾Ð´Ð½Ñ ÑаÑÑо не можÑÑÑ. EFF виÑловлÑÑÑÑÑÑ Ð¿ÑÑмо: конÑÑÐ¾Ð»Ñ Ð½Ð° оÑÐ½Ð¾Ð²Ñ ÑденÑиÑÑкаÑÑÑ Ñ ÑнÑÑÑÑменÑом ÑензÑÑи, а не безпеки.
«...вÑе Ñе ж вÑÑÐ°Ð½Ð¾Ð²Ð»ÐµÐ½Ð½Ñ Ð·Ñ ÑÑоÑоннÑÑ
джеÑел, ÑкÑо йÑи ÑкладнÑÑим ÑлÑÑ
ом?»
Ðев'ÑÑÑ ÐºÑокÑв, 24-годинне оÑÑкÑваннÑ, вÑе Ñе Ð·Ð°Ñ Ð¾Ð²Ð°Ð½Ð¾ глибоко в налаÑÑÑваннÑÑ Ð´Ð»Ñ ÑозÑобникÑв Ñ Ð½Ð°Ð´Ð°ÑÑÑÑÑ ÑеÑез пÑопÑÑÑÑаÑний ÑеÑвÑÑ, Ñкий Google може вÑдкликаÑи бÑдÑ-коли. Це не Ñайдлоадинг. Це Ð¼ÐµÑ Ð°Ð½Ñзм ÑÑÑимÑваннÑ, ÑÑвоÑений Ð´Ð»Ñ Ñого, Ñоб його майже нÑÑ Ñо не пÑойÑов до кÑнÑÑ. РоÑкÑлÑки вÑн пÑаÑÑÑ ÑеÑез СеÑвÑÑи Google Play, а не ÑеÑез Ñам Android, Google може поÑилиÑи Ð¾Ð±Ð¼ÐµÐ¶ÐµÐ½Ð½Ñ Ð°Ð±Ð¾ пÑоÑÑо «вбиÑи» його без жодного ÑÑмÑ.
«...пÑоблема лиÑе Ð´Ð»Ñ ÑиÑ
, ÐºÐ¾Ð¼Ñ Ñ Ñо пÑиÑ
овÑваÑи?»
ÐеÑÑими жеÑÑвами ÑÑанÑÑÑ Ð²Ð¸ÐºÑиваÑÑ ÐºÐ¾ÑÑпÑÑÑ, жÑÑналÑÑÑи Ñа акÑивÑÑÑи в кÑаÑÐ½Ð°Ñ Ð· авÑоÑиÑаÑними Ñежимами. ÐаÑÑÑпними - лÑди, Ñо опинилиÑÑ Ð² ÑиÑÑаÑÑÑÑ Ð´Ð¾Ð¼Ð°ÑнÑого наÑилÑÑÑва. УÑÑ ÑÑ Ð³ÑÑпи маÑÑÑ Ð·Ð°ÐºÐ¾Ð½Ð½Ñ Ð¿ÑдÑÑави поÑиÑÑваÑи або викоÑиÑÑовÑваÑи додаÑки, не вноÑÑÑи ÑÐ²Ð¾Ñ Ð¾ÑобиÑÑÑ Ð´Ð°Ð½Ñ Ð´Ð¾ бази Google. ТÑадиÑÑÑ Ð°Ð½Ð¾Ð½Ñмного внеÑÐºÑ Ñ Ð²ÑдкÑиÑий код ÑÑаÑÑÑа за ÑÐ°Ð¼Ñ ÐºÐ¾Ð¼Ð¿Ð°Ð½ÑÑ Google. Ð¦Ñ Ð¿Ð¾Ð»ÑÑика ÑÑавиÑÑ Ð½Ð° нÑй Ñ ÑеÑÑ Ð² екоÑиÑÑÐµÐ¼Ñ Android.
«...Ñе Ñаме, Ñо ÑобиÑÑ Apple?»
Apple бÑла «огоÑодженим Ñадом» з пеÑÑого днÑ. ÐÑди обиÑали Android Ñаме за Ñе, Ñо вÑн бÑв ÑнÑим. ÐÑгÑÐ¼ÐµÐ½Ñ Â«Apple ÑобиÑÑ Ñак Ñамо» - Ñе ÑлÑÑ Ñ Ð½ÑкÑди Ñа Ñлабке випÑÐ°Ð²Ð´Ð°Ð½Ð½Ñ Ð·Ð° пÑинÑипом tu quoque (Ñам Ñакий). ÐÑлÑÑе Ñого, пÑд ÑиÑком ÑегÑлÑÑоÑÑв (зокÑема ÐÐ°ÐºÐ¾Ð½Ñ ÐС пÑо ÑиÑÑÐ¾Ð²Ñ Ñинки) навÑÑÑ Apple змÑÑена погоджÑваÑиÑÑ. Google же ÑÑÑ Ð°ÑÑÑÑÑ Ñ Ð·Ð²Ð¾ÑоÑÐ½Ð¾Ð¼Ñ Ð½Ð°Ð¿ÑÑмкÑ: намагаÑÑÑÑÑ Ñе ÑилÑнÑÑе закÑÑпиÑи ÑвÑй ÑÑаÑÑÑ ÐºÐ¾Ð½ÑÑолеÑа доÑÑÑпÑ.
«...вÑÑого лиÑе 25 долаÑÑв Ñ ÑÑоÑ
и папеÑÐ¾Ð²Ð¾Ñ ÑÑганини?»
Ðожливо, ÑкÑо ви ÑозÑобник Ñ Ð¡Ð¨Ð Ð· кÑедиÑÐ½Ð¾Ñ ÐºÐ°ÑÑÐºÐ¾Ñ Ñа водÑйÑÑким поÑвÑдÑеннÑм. Ðле ÑпÑобÑйÑе бÑÑи ÑÑÑденÑом Ñ ÐºÑаÑÐ½Ð°Ñ ÐÑÑики на пÑÐ²Ð´ÐµÐ½Ñ Ð²Ñд Ð¡Ð°Ñ Ð°Ñи, диÑиденÑом Ñ Ð'ÑÐ½Ð¼Ñ Ð°Ð±Ð¾ волонÑеÑом, Ñкий пÑдÑÑимÑÑ Ð´Ð¾Ð´Ð°Ñок Ð´Ð»Ñ Ð¼ÑÑÑÐµÐ²Ð¾Ñ Ð³Ñомади. ЦÑна ÑÑÑ Ð½Ðµ лиÑе ÑÑнанÑова: ви пеÑедаÑÑе копÑÑ Ñвого деÑжавного поÑвÑдÑÐµÐ½Ð½Ñ Ð¾Ñоби Ñа Ð´Ð°Ð½Ñ Ð¿Ñо клÑÑÑ Ð¿ÑдпиÑÑ ÐºÐ¾Ð¼Ð¿Ð°Ð½ÑÑ, Ñка ÑегÑлÑÑно виконÑÑ Ð²Ð¸Ð¼Ð¾Ð³Ð¸ ÑÑÑдÑв Ñодо Ð²Ð¸Ð´Ð°Ð»ÐµÐ½Ð½Ñ Ð´Ð¾Ð´Ð°ÑкÑв Ñа деанонÑмÑзаÑÑÑ ÑозÑобникÑв.
ÐайÑе вÑдÑÑÑ!
УÑÑ Ð»Ñди
- ÐÑÑановÑÑÑ F-Droid на Ð²Ð°Ñ ÐºÐ¾Ð¶ÐµÐ½ пÑиÑÑÑÑй з Android. ÐлÑÑеÑнаÑÐ¸Ð²Ð½Ñ Ð¼Ð°Ð³Ð°Ð·Ð¸Ð½Ð¸ додаÑкÑв виживаÑÑÑ Ð»Ð¸Ñе ÑодÑ, коли лÑди ними коÑиÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑ.
- ÐвеÑнÑÑÑÑÑ Ð´Ð¾ ÑвоÑÑ ÑегÑлÑÑоÑÐ½Ð¸Ñ Ð¾ÑганÑв. РегÑлÑÑоÑÐ½Ñ Ð¾Ñгани по вÑÑÐ¾Ð¼Ñ ÑвÑÑÑ ÑиÑо ÑÑÑÑÐ±Ð¾Ð²Ð°Ð½Ñ Ð¿ÑÐ¾Ð±Ð»ÐµÐ¼Ð¾Ñ Ð¼Ð¾Ð½Ð¾Ð¿Ð¾Ð»Ñй Ñа ÑенÑÑалÑзаÑÑÑ Ð²Ð»Ð°Ð´Ð¸ Ñ ÑÐµÑ Ð½Ð¾Ð»Ð¾Ð³ÑÑÐ½Ð¾Ð¼Ñ ÑекÑоÑÑ Ñ Ñ Ð¾ÑÑÑÑ Ð¿Ð¾ÑÑÑи дÑÐ¼ÐºÑ Ð±ÐµÐ·Ð¿Ð¾ÑеÑеднÑо вÑд ÑÐ¸Ñ , кого Ñе ÑÑоÑÑÑÑÑÑÑ Ñ Ñ Ñо пеÑеймаÑÑÑÑÑ ÑÑÑÑ Ð¿ÑоблемоÑ.
- ÐодÑлÑÑÑÑÑ ÑÑÑÑ ÑÑоÑÑнкоÑ. ÐоÑиÑÑйÑе поÑÐ¸Ð»Ð°Ð½Ð½Ñ Ð½Ð° keepandroidopen.org ÑÑÑди.
- Ðе пÑддавайÑеÑÑ Ð½Ð° пÑовокаÑÑÑ Ð¿ÑдÑÑÐ°Ð²Ð½Ð¸Ñ Ð°Ð³ÑÑаÑоÑÑв. ÐÑмÑÑ Â«Ð½Ñ-взагалÑ-Ñо-екÑпеÑÑÑв» Ñже ÑÑÑ Ñк ÑÑÑ. Ðе дозволÑйÑе Ñм дикÑÑваÑи Ñон диÑкÑÑÑÑ.
- ÐÑдпиÑÑÑÑ Ð¿ÐµÑиÑÑÑ Ð½Ð° change.org Ñ Ð¿ÑиÑднайÑеÑÑ Ð´Ð¾ понад 100 000 лÑдей, ÑÐºÑ Ð²Ð¶Ðµ виÑловили ÑÐ²Ð¾Ñ Ð´ÑмкÑ.
- ÐÑоÑиÑайÑе Ñа поÑиÑÑйÑе Ð½Ð°Ñ Ð¼Ð°Ð½ÑÑеÑÑ
- ÐодÑлÑÑÑÑÑ Ð· Google ÑвоÑÑ Ð´ÑмкоÑ, заповнивÑи ÑÑ Ð½Ñ Ð°Ð½ÐºÐµÑÑ Ð´Ð»Ñ Ð¿ÐµÑевÑÑки ÑозÑобникÑв (ÑпÑобÑваÑи ваÑÑо!).
РозÑобники
Ðе ÑеÑÑÑÑÑйÑеÑÑ. Ðе пÑиÑднÑйÑеÑÑ Ð´Ð¾ пÑогÑами, ÑеÑÑÑÑÑÑÑиÑÑ Ñ ÐонÑÐ¾Ð»Ñ ÑозÑобника Android (Android Developer Console) Ñа погоджÑÑÑиÑÑ Ð· ÑÑ Ð½Ñми незвоÑоÑнÑми Умовами викоÑиÑÑаннÑ. Ðе пÑдÑвеÑджÑйÑе ÑÐ²Ð¾Ñ Ð¾ÑобÑ. Ðе гÑайÑе за ÑÑ Ð½Ñми пÑавилами.
Ðлан Google ÑпÑаÑÑÑ Ð»Ð¸Ñе за Ñмови, ÑкÑо ÑозÑобники його доÑÑимÑваÑимÑÑÑÑÑ. Ðе ÑобÑÑÑ ÑÑого.
- ÐеÑеконайÑе ÑнÑÐ¸Ñ ÑозÑобникÑв Ñа оÑганÑзаÑÑÑ Ð½Ðµ ÑеÑÑÑÑÑваÑиÑÑ.
- ÐодайÑе бÑблÑоÑÐµÐºÑ FreeDroidWarn до ваÑÐ¸Ñ Ð´Ð¾Ð´Ð°ÑкÑв, Ñоб повÑдомиÑи коÑиÑÑÑваÑÑв.
- У Ð²Ð°Ñ Ñ ÑайÑ? ÐодайÑе Ð±Ð°Ð½ÐµÑ Ñз вÑдлÑком.
СпÑвÑобÑÑники Google
ЯкÑо вам вÑдомо ÑоÑÑ Ð¿Ñо ÑÐµÑ Ð½ÑÑÐ½Ñ ÑеалÑзаÑÑÑ Ð¿ÑогÑами або ÑÑ Ð²Ð½ÑÑÑÑÑÐ½Ñ Ð»Ð¾Ð³ÑкÑ, звеÑнÑÑÑÑÑ Ð´Ð¾ [email protected] з не ÑобоÑого комп'ÑÑеÑа Ñа з не-Gmail-адÑеÑи. ÐаÑанÑÑÑмо ÑÑвоÑÑ ÐºÐ¾Ð½ÑÑденÑÑйнÑÑÑÑ.
УÑÑ, Ñ Ñо пÑоÑиâ¦
71 оÑганÑзаÑÑй Ñз 23 кÑаÑн пÑдпиÑали манÑÑеÑÑ
April april.org
Rocky Linux rockylinux.org
The Free Software Foundation (FSF) fsf.org
Nextcloud nextcloud.com
Data Rights datarights.ngo
The Free Software Foundation Europe (FSFE) fsfe.org
European Digital Rights (EDRi) edri.org
The Center for Digital Progress (D64) d-64.org
/e/ Foundation e.foundation
Vivaldi Technologies AS vivaldi.com
The Chaos Computer Club (CCC) ccc.de
Open Rights Group (ORG) openrightsgroup.org
FOSDEM fosdem.org
Fundación Karisma karisma.org.co
FUTO futo.org
Software Freedom Conservancy sfconservancy.org
La Quadrature du Net laquadrature.net
GNOME Foundation gnome.org
Proton AG proton.me
Techlore techlore.tech
Digitale Gesellschaft digitale-gesellschaft.ch
Fedimedia fedimedia.it
ARTICLE 19 article19.org
UnifiedPush unifiedpush.org
Italian Linux Society ils.org
Forbrukerrådet forbrukerradet.no
Software Liberty Association of Taiwan slat.org.tw
FULU Foundation fulu.org
CryptPad cryptpad.org
iodé iode.tech
The European Consumer Organisation (BEUC) beuc.eu
Digital Rights Watch digitalrightswatch.org.au
Rossmann Group rossmanngroup.com
The Calyx Institute calyx.org
The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) eff.org
Brave brave.com
GNU/Linux València gnulinuxvalencia.org
MetaBrainz Foundation metabrainz.org
Associação Nacional para o Software Livre (ANSOL) ansol.org
GitHub Store github-store.org
F-Droid f-droid.org
OpenMedia openmedia.org
epicenter.works â for digital rights epicenter.works
Cryptee crypt.ee
The Digital Rights Foundation digitalrightsfoundation.pk
FACiL facil.qc.ca
Technopolice Bruxelles technopolice.be Що кажÑÑÑ ÑнÑÑ
Ð¢ÐµÑ Ð½Ð¾Ð»Ð¾Ð³ÑÑна пÑеÑа
"Keep Android Open â Abwehr gegen Verbot anonymer Apps von Google"
heise online
"Google's New Developer Rules Threaten to End the F-Droid Open-Source App Store"
How-To Geek
"Google's dev registration plan 'will end the F-Droid project'"
The Register
"F-Droid Slams Google for Misleading Users About Android's App Verification"
Android Headlines
"Android app store provider Aptoide hits Google with fresh lawsuit alleging monopoly and anticompetitive chokehold"
Benzinga
"Google's Apple envy threatens to dismantle Android's open legacy"
Ars Technica
"An 'existential' threat to alternative app stores"
The New Stack
"This will wipe out Android as an actual alternative to Apple's mobile OS offerings."
Hackaday
"F-Droid says Google's new sideloading restrictions will kill the project"
Ars Technica
"F-Droid Says Google Is Lying About the Future of Sideloading on Android"
How-To Geek
"Google plans to block side-loading like Apple, declaring war on Android freedom"
Tuta Blog
"It effectively makes the Play Store a monopoly without actually mandating that it is a monopoly."
I-Programmer
"I've been an Android user for almost 15 years -- and Google's sideloading changes are pushing me back to iPhone"
Tom's Guide
"Keep Android Open"
Linux Magazine
"Google is restricting one of Android's most important features, and users are outraged"
SlashGear
"Google will make you wait 24 hours to sideload Android apps"
How-To Geek
"'Keep Android Open' Movement Challenges Google's Developer Verification Rule"
Open Source For U
"Google's Requirement For All Android Developers To Register And Be Verified Threatens To Close Down Open Source App Store F-Droid"
Techdirt
"Sideloading on Android? Soon It'll Be Like a TSA Check for Apps"
Android Headlines
"Android's sideloading limits are its most anti-consumer move yet"
MakeUseOf
"Google's developer registration 'decree' means the end for alternative app stores"
Cybernews
"We all know that's a load of bullshit. Adding a goddamn 24-hour waiting period is batshit insanity."
Thom Holwerda, OSnews
"Google says it's making Android sideloading 'high-friction' to better warn users about potential risks"
XDA Developers
"Google's Attack on Sideloading Will Rob Android of One of Its Best Features"
How-To Geek
"Google's Android developer verification program draws pushback"
InfoWorld
"Google Clamps down On Android's Openness"
Internet Freedom Foundation (India)
"Android Security or Vendor Lock-In? Google's New Sideloading Rules Smell Fishy"
It's FOSS News
"Google's new ID requirements could destroy independent app stores"
TechSpot
"Google will verify Android developers distributing apps outside the Play store"
The Verge
"Open-Source Android Apps Threatened by Google's New Policy"
Datamation
"F-Droid Says Google Is Lying About the Future of Sideloading on Android"
How-To Geek
"Resistance to Google's Android verification grows among developers"
Techzine EU
"Android, Epic, and What's Really Behind Google's 'Existential' Threat to F-Droid"
Slashdot
"Sideloading is dead for all intents and purposes. The Android you know and love is slowly disappearing."
Android Police
"Open letter warns mandatory registration 'threatens innovation, competition, privacy and user freedom'"
Infosecurity Magazine
"Google's Attack on Sideloading Will Rob Android of One of Its Best Features"
How-To Geek
"Over 67 groups urge the company to drop ID checks for apps distributed outside Play"
The Register
"Google will require developer verification to install Android apps, including sideloading"
9to5Google
"F-Droid project threatened by Google's new dev registration rules"
Bleeping Computer
"Google will require developer verification for Android apps outside the Play Store"
TechCrunch
"Open-Source Android Apps at Risk Under Google's New Decree"
TechRepublic
"Google kneecaps indie Android devs, forces them to register"
The Register
"I've been an Android user for almost 15 years -- and Google's sideloading changes are pushing me back to iPhone"
Tom's Guide
"Google's new developer rules could threaten sideloading and F-Droid's future"
Gizmochina
"Sideloading on Android? Soon It'll Be Like a TSA Check for Apps"
Android Headlines
"Google's New Developer ID Rule Could Harm F-Droid"
Reclaim The Net
РедакÑÑÐ¹Ð½Ñ Ð¼Ð°ÑеÑÑали Ñа аналÑзи
"This is not a developer account sign-up. This is comprehensive surveillance of the software development ecosystem."
PixelUnion
"This is a form of malicious compliance with the court orders stemming from its losses to Epic Games."
Cory Doctorow, Pluralistic
"Google's attempts to make Android 'more secure' are, in fact, increasing the risk for Android users. The more friction you introduce in the name of security, the more likely users will attempt to bypass security completely."
Ken Buckler, Enterprise Management Associates
"Android wasn't supposed to be 'safe.' It was supposed to be free."
fireborn, mataroa.blog
"Android is no longer the scrappy rebel. It's just another empire tightening the drawbridge."
Newsfangled
"This could turn Google into the effective gatekeeper for all apps on certified Android devices."
It's FOSS News
"The $25 isn't the real cost. The chilling effect is. Submitting government ID to Google is a non-starter for pseudonymous contributors and privacy researchers."
Arafat Alim, DEV Community
"Google has announced what can only be described as a death blow to the open ecosystem that made Android. Under the guise of 'security,' Google is implementing draconian developer verification requirements."
AndroidSage
"Destroying F-Droid isn't some 'oops.' It's the mission. It's Google finally cutting the last remaining escape route and locking every single user inside their store."
fireborn, mataroa.blog
"Freedom of choice is being reframed as a 'security risk.'"
Newsfangled
"Google has not removed Android's openness, but it is turning openness from a default right into a conditional, attributable, and tiered capability."
MerchMindAI
"This policy represents a dramatic departure from Android's decades-old tradition of openness, in which developers could build and share apps freely without first submitting to a centralized authority."
Biometric Update
"Although Google's claim is that this is for 'security', it does not prevent the regular practice of scammers buying up existing verified developer accounts."
Maya Posch, Hackaday
"One US corporation is placing itself between every Android developer and every Android user on earth."
PixelUnion
"Every additional bureaucratic hurdle reduces diversity in the software ecosystem and concentrates power in large established players."
Mikhail Korotaev, Nextcloud Blog
"Once there is no such thing as 'sideloading', there's virtually no difference between iOS and Android. I see no reason to buy Android over iOS at this point."
Thom Holwerda, OSnews
"Google has announced that they are altering the deal. And telling us that we should pray that they don't alter it further. Block this policy change now before they wrap their cold metal hands around our necks."
Jesse Wilson, PublicObject.com
"Google is turning sideloading from a right into a permission slip, and the open-source community has until September to convince it otherwise."
Reclaim The Net
"This is not about protecting users. This is about control. This is about Google cutting out the last remaining artery of independence in Android."
fireborn, mataroa.blog
"Developers from sanctioned countries or those without Google Play access cannot verify themselves. This creates systemic discrimination against developers based on birthplace rather than conduct."
agnostic-apollo (Termux developer), GitHub
"Google's move is not credibly about 'security,' but actually about consolidating power and tightening control over a formerly open ecosystem."
Techdirt
"The requirement extends Google's gatekeeping authority from its own Play Store to every alternative distribution channel on Android."
LLM Advocates
"Sideloading, a longstanding pillar of Android's openness, is now being marginalized, placing the Android platform closer to the walled-garden approach of Apple's iOS."
Purism
"The phone you bought and paid for is no longer really yours. Google decides which apps are allowed to be loaded on Android and which are not."
Tuta Blog
"Innovation may be the biggest casualty in all of this. This new rule erodes your right to make informed decisions about your own devices."
MakeUseOf
"Google isn't certifying apps, they're certifying developers. This implies that the company can somehow predict whether a developer will do something malicious in the future."
Cory Doctorow, Pluralistic
"The proposed Android Developer Verification program isn't a security update; it's a kill switch for the open ecosystem."
Hillary Keverenge, Tech-ish Kenya
"Google's story that this move is motivated by security is obviously bullshit. The idea that Google can improve Android's safety by certifying developers, rather than code, is obvious bullshit."
Cory Doctorow, Pluralistic
"Android is not open anymore. It's not an alternative. It's not even trying. It's iOS with ads and spyware bolted on."
fireborn, mataroa.blog
"There is also the very real possibility that Google will leak your identity with the result that any apps with political implications could result in persecution and worse."
I-Programmer
"Centralizing the registration of all applications worldwide gives Google newfound powers to completely disable any app it wants."
Mikhail Korotaev, Nextcloud Blog
"What student is going to upload their passport to a trillion-dollar surveillance corporation just to share their weekend project?"
fireborn, mataroa.blog
"Android does not just warn anymore. It enforces."
Youssef Mabrouk, Ostorlab
ÐÑганÑзаÑÑÑ Ñа манÑÑеÑÑи
"Google Play itself has repeatedly hosted malware, proving that corporate gatekeeping doesn't guarantee user protection."
F-Droid
"Ultimately, Google's plan will stop you from owning your Android phone."
Tuta
"Google's abusive approach to the Android operating system has only gotten worse in recent years. Software freedom is sorely lacking in the 'computers in our pockets' we call cell phones."
Free Software Foundation
"Nearly 50 organizations published an open letter opposing what they characterize as a 'kill switch for the open ecosystem.'"
Tech-ish Kenya
"We are running out of time until Google becomes the gate-keeper of all users devices."
F-Droid
"Verification just confirms who's behind the app, it doesn't guarantee clean code or rule out malicious behavior."
AdGuard
"Changes would impose barriers to entry for individual developers, small teams and volunteer projects by imposing fees, identity checks and terms that may not align with the principles of an open ecosystem."
Infosecurity Magazine
"While Android used to be praised for its freedom and independence, it will become a closed shop just like Apple."
Tuta
"There are governments who might very much like to know the names of the developers of those applications so that they can go after them."
Electronic Frontier Foundation
"We unequivocally advise against signing up for this program, now or ever."
F-Droid Open Letter
"Unilaterally consolidating power to approve software into the hands of a single unaccountable corporation is a threat to digital sovereignty everywhere."
Nextcloud
"A centralized global registration system for Android will inevitably chill this work. Those communities are likely to drop out of developing for Android altogether."
Electronic Frontier Foundation
"Independent software distribution on Android will now require Google's explicit permission."
AdGuard
"This is a profound change, one that shatters the entire premise of the Android ecosystem, long regarded as the antithesis of the closed Apple ecosystem."
AdGuard
"Google's developer verification policy creates a centralized database, controlled by a single corporation, containing the real-world identity of every person who writes software for Android."
Brave
"A policy that forces every Android developer to hand their identity to Google, regardless of whether they use Google's services, makes Android a less-open and less-private platform."
Brave
"When you set up a gate, you invite authorities to use it to block things they don't like. And when you build a database, you invite governments to try to get access."
Electronic Frontier Foundation
"For developers building tools specifically designed to protect user privacy, being forced to surrender their own personal data as a precondition for distribution is deeply contradictory."
AdGuard
"Google is turning Android into a walled garden monopoly. We must prevent it."
Osservatorio Nessuno
"Centralised, intransparent security architectures certainly help secure monetization and the market by locking out competitors."
Nextcloud
"MEP Christel Schaldemose formally questioned whether Google's mandatory central registration is compatible with the Digital Markets Act."
European Parliament
"Android's biggest strength has always been its openness. That's what attracted developers and users in the first place."
AdGuard
"Developers who choose not to use Google's services should not be forced to register with, and submit to the judgement of, Google."
Open letter, over 67 signatory organizations
"If it were to be put into effect, the developer registration decree will end the F-Droid project and other free/open source app distribution sources as we know them today."
F-Droid
"Developers who build privacy-first browsers, encrypted messaging apps, VPNs, Tor-based software or tools for journalists and activists would be required to upload government ID to Google. These developers are unlikely to trust Google and might stop developing for Android."
Brave
"Your Smartphone, Their Rules: How App Stores Enable Corporate-Government Censorship."
ACLU
"This extends Google's gatekeeping authority beyond its own marketplace into distribution channels where it has no legitimate operational role."
Open letter, over 67 signatory organizations
"This invasion of privacy of developers is not just an overreach of Google's authority over Android, but also jeopardizes developer safety."
Software Freedom Conservancy
"The European Pirate Party called for proportionate and transparent measures that ensure security without restricting innovation, limiting anonymity, or distorting competition."
European Pirate Party
"Remember: It's your phone, your data, your freedom. Don't let Google take it away."
Tuta
"Google will cut off independent developers to Android if they do not register with Google first. This will kill independent platforms like F-Droid and severely impede FLOSS devs from creating apps for Android."
KDE
"Forcing software creators into a centralized registration scheme is as egregious as forcing writers and artists to register with a central authority."
F-Droid
ЮÑÑбеÑи Ñа ÑвоÑÑÑ ÐºÐ¾Ð½ÑенÑÑ
"The widely-circulated narrative that Google already backed down from this is false. They didn't, and that misunderstanding may be the most dangerous part of the story right now."
Techlore – YouTube
"Google is doing to Android what Microsoft once tried to do to the web. Embrace, extend, extinguish. Just wrapped in a shinier open-source package."
ChiefGyk3D – YouTube
"Follow the money. Google makes money when apps are downloaded from its store. Google has completely forgotten about its earlier company motto: Don't be evil."
Tuta Blog – Blog
"Google has been carefully watching from the sidelines to see what exactly it is that Apple can get away with."
Linus Sebastian, LMG Clips – YouTube
"Every single time a company takes away your ability to do what you want with what you bought and paid for, every single time they twist a knife, we have to point it out."
Louis Rossmann – YouTube
"Google isn't testing this in the US or Europe first. They're starting in countries like Brazil, Indonesia, Singapore, and Thailand. Why? Because these are massive growth markets where regulation is weaker. By the time regulators catch up, the damage will already be done."
ChiefGyk3D – YouTube
"Google already can disable malware that they find on your device. It's already a built-in feature. So what is developer registration actually adding here? Is it security or control? You decide."
Techlore – YouTube
"Google keeps getting in as much trouble as Apple when Google is half evil and Apple is full evil. So there are probably people inside Google saying, 'Why not just go full evil?'"
Louis Rossmann – YouTube
"Google is setting a requirement that only they can fulfill, forcing developers to go through Google and killing off thousands of apps. Countless users stranded."
Techlore – YouTube
"A world where two tech companies from the same city that dominate all of our mobile devices both require centralized developer registration is a world with one more lever for surveillance, one more checkpoint for censorship."
Techlore – YouTube
"If I'm going to be trapped in a walled garden anyway, I'll take the one that's built properly."
fireborn – Blog
"The fact of the matter is, this is my device. I paid a lot of money for it. I should be able to do with it what I want."
Switched to Linux – YouTube
"Android has become what they set out to destroy."
Linus Sebastian, LMG Clips – YouTube
"I'm not using the word 'phone.' I'm using the word 'computer.' This has over 8 GB of RAM, a terabyte of storage. It's a computer. And I'm also not going to be using words like 'sideload.' When you download an exe file onto your Windows computer, you've installed an application. You haven't 'sideloaded' something."
Louis Rossmann – YouTube
"I have really no more strong reason to not recommend you all get iPhones, because this just is pretty much an iPhone with a Google logo on it at this point."
Techlore – YouTube
"This means you can't sideload an app from an unofficial source. But it could also be used to lock the ecosystem so we're forced to install only Google apps on approved Google OS versions."
Rob Braxman Tech – Locals
"That's not openness. That is control."
ChiefGyk3D – YouTube
"Developers of privacy-focused tools and emulators will have to dox themselves, making them vulnerable to government agencies or legal action."
SomeOrdinaryGamers (Mutahar) – YouTube
"Your device, their rules. The phone you bought and paid for is no longer really yours."
Tuta Blog – Blog
"Google is removing the one key advantage Android has over iOS."
SomeOrdinaryGamers (Mutahar) – YouTube
"When you download applications, you've simply installed an application. I don't want to use words like 'sideload.'"
SomeOrdinaryGamers (Mutahar) – YouTube
"This is an iPhone now. I didn't want to buy an iPhone. I use Android because it gives me freedom. If you are not going to give me freedom with my computer, then why would I buy your stuff anymore?"
Louis Rossmann – YouTube
"Google decides what's safe for you, and you don't get a say."
fireborn – Blog
"This has obvious problems for non-Google operating systems like iodeOS, LineageOS, or BraxOS. Google Android will 'check in' with Google to verify the identity of the app and to validate the operating system."
Rob Braxman Tech – Locals
"F-Droid is basically saying that the new Google developer registration process will likely kill the open-source app store entirely."
The Linux Experiment – YouTube
"Imagine Dell told you that you could no longer install any operating system other than Windows on your laptop. That's what Google is doing to your phone."
SomeOrdinaryGamers (Mutahar) – YouTube
"This represents the last real safe place for free and open-source software in the entire mobile ecosystem. Once it's gone, it's gone. And we're going to spend the next decade trying to claw it back."
Techlore – YouTube
РозÑобники Ñа ÑпÑлÑноÑа
"Play store is full of scam apps, F-Droid isn't, but Play Store is considered secure. It's all theatre."
gcupc, Lobsters
"Signal, VPNs -- they'll have a list of everyone opting out of government-mandated backdoors."
Max-P, Lemmy
"I teach digital literacy and 99% of unsavory software I encounter on people's phones come from the Play Store or App Store. I will believe they're serious about protecting users when I see them do something about the crap ton of borderline scam apps infesting their stores."
1995ToyotaCorolla, Lemmy
"Anyone else thinking this looks like a precursor to banning Signal and similar? 1) Put Google in control of what you can install. 2) Get Google to block it."
harry8, Hacker News
"If Android's sandbox and permission systems actually worked, then the mere act of installing an app from an arbitrary source would be as harmless as visiting an arbitrary website."
mwcampbell, Lobsters
"There's an entire genre of scamming where the scammers spend months building rapport with their victims before cashing out. One day is nothing."
free_bip (on the 24-hour wait defeating scammers), Hacker News
"They have stolen a free product and are now actively locking out the people who built it."
TheTearMiser, Lemmy
"We are talking about something categorically worse than vendor lock-in: Collective vendor lock-in."
anordal, Lobsters
"Modern life practically forces you to put all your eggs into a phone controlled by one of two profit-seeking companies."
koala, Lobsters
"Making it harder makes it harder to treat ourselves. Software like AndroidAPS is unique. It's hard to find or very expensive and inferior in the proprietary market."
pimeys (diabetic user on life-critical medical software), Lobsters
"All the banking and payment apps in India refuse to open if you have developer mode on."
nibbleyou (developer in India), Hacker News
"My Pixel 6 just broke, and after 15 years of using Android, I've finally been convinced to move to iOS. If I must live in a walled garden, I suppose I'll choose the one with nicer flowers."
yonato, Hacker News
"Some time in the future, we will look back to this era and ask ourselves what went wrong."
BenjaminRi, Lobsters
"If I go down this path, I will stop all development on Android. I implore all other developers to resist this. This will completely lock down the platform forever, there will be no going back."
BatteryMountain, Hacker News
"I hate this so much. More and more I get the feeling I have no control over the devices I own. My fear is that Windows will eventually follow. For security reasons of course. It's the path we're on now."
cheesyvoetjes, Reddit
"Android is for everyone, provided they submit to Google exclusively."
gumby271, Hacker News
"Brazil government app refuses to operate with developer mode on."
flykespice (developer in Brazil), Hacker News
"You have no right telling me what I can and cannot run on my own devices."
MrZander, Hacker News
"I buy a device with my own money, which I supposedly then own, but then I need to ask some corporation permission to use it."
askonomm, Hacker News
"If the likes of Google, Microsoft, Apple, Amazon, and others have their way, you will not own your computer; those companies will effectively own your computers."
RUs1729, Slashdot
"Give me liberty or give me Symbian."
masterofn001, Lemmy
"The open Android I knew and loved is long gone."
girvo, Hacker News
"The phrase 'sideload' is psychological propaganda we are all best off rejecting."
WaffleMonster, Slashdot
"Google selling Android as both open source and open to running any software you like in order to quickly gain market share, only to break those promises after driving competing platforms out of the market is nothing more than fraud."
GeekyBear, Hacker News
"Computing is infrastructure. Personal computers are a means of expressing agency. This is like banning people from moving furniture around their house without approval from mortgage lenders."
wervenyt, Tildes
"It took them 17 years to finally pull the cage all the way shut."
Apocryphon, Hacker News
"Social engineering is destroyed with education, not with restriction and control. Trading freedom for safety eliminates both."
survirtual, Hacker News
"This is a war on users that want to keep control of their phones and when it's done, you will not be able to escape the enshittification."
ikidd, Lemmy
"Google seems to actively hate people who develop for their platforms."
hbn, Hacker News
"Google has no right to be my parent. As long as I can't reject paternalism, I don't believe for a second this is done with the well-being of scam victims as the main priority."
gspr, Lobsters
"Can't come at a worse time. People are just learning to make things through vibe coding, and they're gonna want to put their own apps on their phones. And now Google says no."
Serinus, Lemmy
"Google's own Play Store had over 600 million malware downloads. They keep talking about 'security' but their own store is crawling with fake apps and straight up malware while actual useful stuff gets buried or rejected."
Historical-Employ129 (324 upvotes), Reddit
"For 'security' -- always security with these assholes. They're just building the walls of the walled garden higher."
lynxy, Tildes
"Whatever Google is doing kind of scares me. We have a big DIY community of diabetics in Germany running tools like AndroidAPS that cannot ever be distributed through official channels."
pimeys (Type 1 diabetic, DIY medical software), Lobsters
"It is a disgrace how Google has managed this situation. The promised 'advanced flow' hasn't appeared in any Android 16 or 17 betas. Google is quietly proceeding with the original lockdown."
fermigier, Hacker News
"If your country is ever in the crosshairs of 'American interests' and bears the brunt of its sanctions, it is possible that you cannot install apps from your fellow citizens. Your own local government, bank, and store apps."
devsda, Hacker News
"Google now has a flag on my phone they can control remotely to keep me from accessing the apps I want."
vala, Lemmy
"The fundamental problem is that we are relying on the good graces of Google to keep Android open, despite the fact that it often runs contrary to their goals as a $4T for-profit behemoth. The 'don't be evil' days are very far behind us."
paxys, Hacker News
"I still remember how in the early days of Android vs iOS discussions, the main point was 'but it's OPEN!' The word 'open' was used as a comma by Google people. It was The Thing. The Difference. Good vs Evil and all that."
jwr, Hacker News
"This isn't just a competition between app stores; it's a struggle for choice and dignity. Your phone shouldn't be a cage carefully constructed by others, but an extension of your own will."
renshijian, Hacker News
"'Sideload' is like 'jaywalking'; seeks to stigmatize humans being human."
tejtm, Hacker News
"Google wants the authority of a gatekeeper without the overhead of human accountability."
afferi300rina, Hacker News
"You are essentially a child to them. The difference is society has decided not to step in to protect you from your abusive parents."
globular-toast, Hacker News
"Any time someone puts a lock on something that belongs to you, and won't give you a key, they're not doing it for your benefit."
vord (quoting Cory Doctorow), Tildes
"Software gatekeeping is a threat to human rights. Just recently an app to track ICE was banned from the iOS app store even though this should clearly be protected first amendment speech."
gthing, Reddit
"Once deployed, there's a near 100% chance of such a mechanism being used for evil."
Zak, Lemmy
"Requiring a government ID to distribute software. Holy shit. If you are a kid and want to create a game for your friends, you better get that birth certificate ready!"
llitz, Reddit
"They're boiling the frog -- slowly removing features until all choice is gone."
hn92726819, Hacker News
"The war on General Purpose Computing is the death of innovation and a direct attack on digital freedom."
layfellow, Hacker News
"Antitrust action is badly needed. It is ridiculous that I need permission from my device manufacturer to install software on hardware I own."
jim201, Hacker News
"I want to deploy apps on my device. They are my apps, it's my device, and I should not be required to ask for permission to do so."
fsniper, Hacker News
"We need to start treating phones differently. We're entering a world where we can't choose what we run on them. Their primary purpose is to gather data on us and serve us advertising, they're engineered for addiction, yet engaging in the world is immensely difficult without one."
specproc, Hacker News
"Google's plan to require developer verification would give Google and governments the ability to ban any app."
Zak, Hacker News
"Twice I have had to deal with Google silently disabling my drone app to the point I had to buy an older phone to perform work. When I purchase a device that works with another device, under no circumstances should I be at the mercy of any updates they make."
cbrophoto (drone professional), Reddit
"Android was never actually open and now they are abandoning even the thin pretense."
Tiraon, Tildes
"It's not cyclic. It's a ratchet and it gets tighter and tighter."
BenjaminRi, Lobsters
"After 15 years of professional development on Android I too am now thinking about switching my focus to something different. And it sucks."
MrDresden, Hacker News
"Don't beg. Don't get in a position that freedoms depend on the whims of a corporation or willingness of a government to regulate them. Build."
jzb, Lobsters
"Years ago, I wondered how Google would try to get away with locking down Android and shutting the cage door after capturing such a large dependent user base. Now I see how they are trying to get away with it."
chaznabin, Reddit
ÐÑмки авÑоÑÑв пеÑиÑÑÑ
"Android used to be all about giving its users freedom over the walled garden approach of iOS. If Google will be following the same path of Apple, they will be losing a major competitive advantage among pro users. "
Freddy, change.org
"Google is going to ruin what they built and turn into Apple. "
Abnormal Software, change.org
"Freedom is fundamental. "
S, change.org
"I use Android because I believe in its policy on freedom of software. If Google is able to take that away, it puts immense power in the hands of 2 giant companies (Apple and Google) as the sole arbiters of what software billions of people are and aren't allowed to use. That scares me, and it should scare you too. "
Nate, change.org
"Goggle shouldn't limit our freedoms on our own devices for any reason "
Tristin, change.org
"As a user who has used the Android operating system for several years, this seems quite unfair to app developers who rely on third-party distribution channels, supposedly to "unify" the system and make it "more secure." But it simply eliminates the way third parties who aren't in the Apple App Store can distribute apps; this applies to emulators I can use on Android and apps that aren't available in the App Store. Besides eliminating the freedom they boasted about Apple, they want to implement this business model, which affects app developers' privacy (and it's clear that UK laws are having a significant impact). "
juan pablo, change.org
"I got an Android tablet for the freedom it offered over an ios device such as ipads and iphones. If Google's going to lock the system down anyway, I might as well buy a touchscreen for a Raspberry Pi and repurpose it instead of using Android in the future. "
Timothy, change.org
"We need to stop the monopolies and surveillance of big tech corporations "
Tyler, change.org
"Android giving users choice has been the staple point of android OS. Removing choices like sideloading apps is not the move. I develop apps for myself, I do not want to be "an approved developer" I don't have time nor care for that. This action also is the beginning of censorship, and monopolization of android OS. Android started as an open operating system, you have simply turned it into a reskinned Apple OS. Your choice to go anti-consumer is going to hurt. You are not "protecting" anyone. ~Seth "
Nathan, change.org
"There has always been more freedom with Android and that is why people choose it. Taking this freedom away will take your customers away. We will always find or create another option. "
Danny, change.org
"The iOS user experience is invariably more polished and seamless than any Android device. In the tablet market especially, Android can't hold a candle to iOS when it comes to usable. For the entirety of Android's existence, the freedom to use our devices the way we want, rather than being beholden to the whims of a manufacturer, has been THE reason to use Android. Not a reason, not the most important or compelling reason, THE ONE AND ONLY REASON. To remove or hamper the ability to sideload apps is to remove Android's only reason to exist. Remember, no matter how many of our rights and abilities you remove with regard to how customers use their devices, there's one right you cannot touch: our right to purchase an objectively easier to use iOS device. "
Pranam, change.org
"This OS has been the only place that has felt free, the ability to download anything from anywhere is what a phone should be able to do. They trying to take away my freedom, and I refuse to bend the knee and accept it. "
Austin, change.org
"Im an adult. I paid for a device based on the promise of features. If I wanted someone to hold my hand while im online I'd get an iPhone or hire a state nurse to watch me. Really this is small, but a first step toward total control from big companies, good luck being an independent developer or whatever in the future when no one can download you stuff bc Google said so. And, as a consumer, think of all the good crowd funded and indie games and products that come out and rival if not demolish the big companies. This is how they stop that, dont let them. "
Ryan, change.org
"As an android guru who runs a blog on getting the best out of android who often recommends and personally use many side loaded apps since a lot of the best apps are on places like f droid and sinilar places but not on google. Ultimately its sad to see android and apple be these walled gardens "
L, change.org
"Android you are not our parents, stop acting like sanctioned company guardians. Nobody asked for this. It must be your goal to make yourself another worse option for operating devices. "
Eva, change.org
"Android has long been the operating system that has allowed customization and freedom. It's the bedrock on why I use the platform. Taking away the ability to use FOSS and alternative sources just kills what makes Android Android for me. At that stage I might as well give in and get a blue bubble and better base privacy. Super disappointed in this direction. "
Jacob, change.org
"The best part of android is the freedom to do what we want, downloading fan made apps and such is the freedom we like its kinda only reason people buy androids "
Andrew, change.org
"Oh great and wise corporate overlords, I come to you a mere peon, a cog in your profit machine, to implore you to keep Android open to small or niche developers. If you implement the proposed changes you will have turned a thriving app ecosphere into nothing more than a reskinned iOS. Your commitment to Open Source and the availability of Android-.apk-but-not-via-Google are on the line here. Many of the most compelling use cases for my Android device would cease to exist under the proposed regime. If that happens I might as well switch to iOS devices, at least they are pretty. "
Michael, change.org
"The level of control Google is attempting to exert over developers and users is unreal. If I download an app from a source that isn't the play store, I shouldn't need Google's approval. I will seek alternate operating systems from the Android and iOS duopoly if this goes through. "
Alice, change.org
"I honestly don't understand why this even has to be petitioned for in the first place. It should be self-evident that it should be entirely up to the user what software should be installed on their own device. "
Patrick, change.org
"The one positive thing differentiating Android from iOS has been the ability for Android users to make their own choices about what's installed on their devices. Killing that differentiator is the exact opposite of forward progress. "
Ryan, change.org
"I choose to use android devices because they provide more freedom and ability to control my own devices and how I use them. I cannot support any measure that limits those freedoms in any way or drives up costs in a world where costs are already increasing due to incompetence and lack of care for the average person. "
Scott, change.org
"Android was created as an open platform. That openness made custom ROMs, alternative app stores, and independent FOSS projects possible. Limiting third-party APK installation reduces user choice and hurts independent developers. Security matters, but it should not remove legitimate options. Keeping Android open protects innovation and freedom of choice. "
Kevyn, change.org
"Sim ao Android "
Cristina, change.org
"Every time you centralise something, you are adding a point of failure that used to not exist. And you can not trust those who care only for money to care for anything else. "
Andrew, change.org
"Dear Google, As a life-long Android user, the perspective of this program ever coming into place is simply devastating. The Android Project was built with the promise of open-source software, community-driven development and digital freedom at its core. This promise has been a vital part of its success, from its humble beginnings to the widely popular and prolific ecosystem we have today. Any measure that does not fully respect these core values is a direct threat to the Android Project as a whole and a betrayal of its community. I believe the "Android developer verification requirements" program as it stands is such a measure. Therefore, I urge everybody involved at Google to seriously reconsider this program to the benefit of the Android Project and its community. Sincerely- "
Yoann, change.org
"Android, if you are going to be just like Apple, I think many might as well just switch to Apple devices..... Please reconsider "
Kaleonahe, change.org
"Big tech companies are more and more trying to restrict users and make them use their services. Anti-competitive practices are bad for the market and for the end user, so i definitely DO NOT support what google is doing. "
QByte, change.org
"You will bury yourselves. "
William, change.org
"Not allowing users to install the applications of their choosing on their own device and forcing developers to verify themselves with Google, even if they exclusively want to make their applications available on alterntive app stores is outrageous and completely unacceptable. "
Brandon, change.org
"I am very conceded that our government and big technology is building a electronic prison to enslave humanity. Google is working to this end by implementing tactics like requiring their permission to create and use apps that big government and big technology approve. This is evil and must be stopped if we are to have any freedom and privacy. "
Pamela, change.org
"I like an open source because we're not stuck to when we might not. It about prefence. I have never used iOS but this might change my mind. I will look for an alternative to android if this takes place. "
Leoncio, change.org
"This is a horrendous plan. The Android Open Source Project is supposed to be just that... Open source. Requiring developers to provide Id, pay a fee, and register to release software for phones that people own is untenable. This is effectively making Android as much of a walled garden as Apple. Except Apple does it better. The whole draw of Android was the openness of the platform. If you remove that, we would be better off with Apple. PLEASE do not ruin Android by going ahead with this misguided plan. "
Alan, change.org
"I develop apps for personal use and use fdroid for open source and privacy focused apps. This will just be another step towards tyranny and control "
Jackson, change.org
"I do not want Google to limit my freedom of speech or right to privacy. Google is a monopoly and must be dismantled. This has to stop. "
Tristan, change.org
"If I wanted a phone that decided what I can and can't do I would have bought an iPhone. "
Tom, change.org
"The entire point of choosing android over IOS is for the freedom to install things that may or may not work. 3rd party installation already requires you to go through some hoops . Its my device let me install what I want. "
Brian, change.org
"We need at least one open mobile platform, and that's something I will never compromise on. If you're gonna take that away from us, go screw yourselves. We will not go quietly into the night. "
Takashi, change.org
"This is a clear grab at power over Android's massive userbase to manipulate the masses via censorship and mass surveillance. If this isn't stopped, they will only push the rules further and further until the slope is so slippery it becomes a cliff. "
Boris, change.org
"Android's biggest advantage over iOS is its open nature! "
Michael, change.org
"This won't stop until we put an end to monopolies! "
daniel, change.org
"Don't let Google shut down Android, let your voice be heard! "
Gustavo, change.org
"Like many others I use Android because it is more open than iOS. This change strips away one of the few real advantages it has over iPhone, sideloading apps. This change is not going to make iPhone users switch to Android but will make Android users look for alternatives. "
Omar, change.org
"Protect Android FREEDOM... Iâve used Android for years because it stood for freedom and choice. But lately Google has been making it harder to install APK files apps that come from outside the Play Store. That freedom to choose what I put on my own phone is what made Android different, and itâs slowly disappearing. Iâm not a developer or hacker just someone who believes that the device I bought should truly belong to me. I should be able to install safe apps from any source without being blocked or discouraged. This isnât about breaking rules itâs about keeping control over our own technology. If Google keeps tightening these restrictions Android will lose the openness that made it great. I care because user freedom matters and I donât want to see it taken away bit by bit. "
Boris, change.org
"Control. That is all this is. Protection is a word you use to hide your true intentions, google. Google promised a platform where everybody can choose what they want; Linux does this, Windows does this. But google chose to threaten the very way of technology. We as consumers want freedom over the products we purchase, not "protection" from things "outside" of our control or knowledge. "
Trevor, change.org
"I have always used android because of the control I have over MY phone. Installing whatever apps I want from WHEREVER I want is one if the main reasons I prefer android! I will do everything I can to keep this from happening! "
Britanie, change.org
"The whole reason I have used Android over iOS is because of the increased freedom to control the device I OWN. My phone is mine and I should be able to use it as I see fit. Companies like Google need to be forced to stop this anti comsumer behavior. "
Mark, change.org
"In a time when a few big companies are controlling everything, having access to open source alternatives is more important than ever. We don't need more restrictions and less access. Right now you can come up with a great idea, create said idea, then share it with other android users. The only barriers are your own willingness to learn. But google is trying to destroy what makes android great! Don't let it happen. Sign the petition, make noise on social media, boycott if it comes to it. Don't let the people at the top continue taking away and restricting things we love and need. It can feel like they're untouchable. But they rely on us for that power and control. If enough people resist they will revert the planned changes. Because in the end we're the consumer and all they care about is "the numbers go up". They need us for that. "
Anthony, change.org
"Changes like this severely limit fledgeling development. While you promise easy ways to register for free, any barrier can be enough to stop someone from making their first app. Additionally, anonymous publishing should be available for applications that may go against the will of those in power. This change limits freedom as well as killing the developer community. "
Jack, change.org
"Censorship and authoritarian regime in the guise of security is asinine and should be illegal. Monopoly is illegal. Google is digging its own grave. "
Billy, change.org
"Openness was supposedly Android's mission to difference itself from iOS and now they're gonna take it away? I don't want a closed system, you're just making a worse version of iOS and throwing away one of the biggest selling points of your OS, keep Android open. "
Ernesto, change.org
"After dithering for ages, I finally did what I've always wanted to do, I installed a de-googled android it's, E/Os. Its great! If google persist in this, I'm sure more non technical users will too! I also wrote to my mp & to the UK monopoly commission. Search E/Os murena see if you can too! "
ed, change.org
"I'll be concise. This is not the right direction to go. This really is a monopoly and openness is the right choice. You're causing more harm than good and people's freedom of choice needs to be addressed. Thank you. "
Aaron, change.org
"We have the right to choose what apps we want to use or not to use leave it alone "
DENNIS, change.org
"If you, as an Android user are happy using Android but dont understand what this is about, go out and buy an iPhone. Then you'll understand. "
ROBERT, change.org
"If wee do not stop this then our computers are next. We will end up the same as other countries who put out the same message to their people to condition them. Our freedom of speech and the right to privacy under the privacy act will be taken away. You do not want this!!! "
Keith, change.org
"Mandating government identification and a registration fee to share software is a direct violation of the open-source principles and digital privacy that defined the platform. This change creates an unnecessary financial barrier for independent developers and students, effectively stifling global innovation and the creation of niche, non-commercial tools. By positioning itself as the sole gatekeeper of all app installations, Google is stripping away user autonomy and transforming a once-free ecosystem into a restrictive "walled garden." "
Ibrahim, change.org
"We all need security and FOSS apps! "
Chris, change.org
"As a regular user and a small developer, I find this measure deeply concerning. When I choose to buy an Android phone, it is with the expectation of having control over how I use it, not to face restrictions or censorship. Tools like Knox and Play Integrity are already frustrating enough, and now it seems that even downloading applications from F-Droid or other nice Stores should be checked ?! This undermines both user freedom and the open spirit that originally defined Android. We have ( well we have to take it back) the right to create, modify, and use appsâand to communicate onlineâwithout being forced to give up anonymity. It is up to users to educate themselves about potential risks, not for GAFAM to decide on our behalf. "
naknak, change.org
"APPLE wAS GONE LONG AGO NOW WHERE WILL WE GO? "
henry, change.org
"Well google showed their true colours. Time to start migrating all my accounts away from them. What a joke. "
Jordan, change.org
"I have payed and continue to pay for an android device. The right to upload whatever app I please on my own device should be maintained. By extension, developers shouldn't have to give money, personal identifying information, and private sign in keys to google. Nor should developers be subjected to google's constant scrutinized spying and biases through : - Being forced to agree to google's terms and conditions. - Alongside extorting app identifiers for the entirety of an app's life span. Taking away and inhibiting both the ability to do what I want with my own device and the ability of developers to share their creations with others is wrong. What google is proposing is anti-consumer and against the values of freedom. "
Alexandria, change.org
"This change has nothing to do with security, it wants to remove the power of choice from the user and screw up many developer by forcing them to use the Play Store. Android is all about freedom and will always be. "
Yuri, change.org
"We suffer from a dissociative disorder and one the only possible disability aid for it is not on the app store. If we lose access to this aid, our life is functionaly over. Either make it easier to put apps on the play store or knock it off. "
Isaiah, change.org
"Android has always been about freedom and customization. Let's keep it that way "
Jacob, change.org
"We did not ask for this. We do not consent to this. Android's entire identity is built around it being an open platform. We know you aren't doing this for security, you're doing it for control. Don't be evil. "
Gregor, change.org
"I figured out how to play Minecraft Java Edition on my phone, and Google is trying to take that away from me? Besides that, there are probably dozens of unverified apps on my phone that I would REALLY like to keep, and Google requiring verification will basically turn my phone into a little YouTube machine. I hate that and you should too. "
David, change.org
"Google should not be able to say what apps we can and canât download; we are adults and until its illegal for a good and vaild point; i should be allowed to youse the phone i paid for with hard earned money they way I want: the freedom that comes with growing up. I use a lot of niche software/apps and can only do it on android due to its openess. Please stop with this eshitifcation of products and services; eventually will stop buying. We buy products that benefit us; once that stops we will stop buying them; and companies need our money so please actually listen to consumer base that gives you the money you desire. What made me choose Android over iOS is the openness of it. By doing this you are killing what make android great, the fact that everyone can make an app and load it on his phone. You don't have iOS fan base. We will go elsewhere. "
kea, change.org
"It's disappointing that Google wants to take away the only good thing about Android. I said it last time and I'll say it again: if they do it, I'm switching to Apple. There won't be any difference anyway. "
Rubén, change.org
"We ned open source application PLEASE "
french, change.org
"If android truly blocks what are some of my favorite apps from developers I trust, I will no longer be using "smart" phones without root. It'll be graphine or flip phones, I promise you. "
R, change.org
"Also consider giving money towards the Graphene OS at grapheneos.org/donate "
Adam, change.org
"I will dtop uding Android if this is beeing implemented "
Cederick, change.org
"Google is an evil entity. I'm not surprised they're doing something evil. "
Justin, change.org
"Google is about to further close down Android, which isn't good at all. If anything, it's going to hurt everyone, and furthermore, what if others start to copy them and lock down their ecosystems in a similar manner? For example, what if Microsoft starts locking down Windows app dev like Google is locking down Android app dev, and starts restricting sideloading exes? "
Joshua, change.org
"Please don't close off the Android ecosystem. I'm an Android user because it gives me the freedom to install apps while taking responsibility for my installations. That's what differentiates it from iPhone and the reason I chose it. "
VÃctor, change.org
"I dislike all the changes that have undergone Android, but this one takes the cake for the worst one i could have ever imagined. "
Pye, change.org
"The ability to download and install APK's from any source is a choice that should not be taken from users. It's the whole reason Android OS is successful now. Taking away choice will drive users to seek out other software solutions. Keeping Android Open is important to stop corporate overeach, unnecessary tracking and selling of user data, and keeping software available and fair. "
Christopher, change.org
"This change would essentially make android comparable to iOS in the sense of the restricted amount of freedom we have over the operating system and how we want the operating system to function. This will also result in a constant battle between new "crackers" trying to find ways to spoof the signature system and Google patching the spoofs to keep the system restricted. This is not for security, this is corporate control over a dominating service they can milk for profit and add to their greed "
Simon, change.org
"As a user, I will always opt to sideload apps whenever possible. Whether I need a photo editor, keyboard app, audio equalizer app, or any other kinds of apps, I consistently seek open-sourced sideloading options before I even consider using the Google Play Store. Whenever I need any mobile app that isn't social, I prioritize finding an open-sourced app solution. With Google's dominance in the global mobile OS market, it's clear they will attempt to restrict any freedoms of their OS that they can get their hands on if they're not stopped. The importance of maintaining the freedom to sideload apps has never been more critical. Legislative initiatives like the App Store Accountability Act, which pushes users into surrendering personal private details to proprietary third-party solutions for identity verification, underscore why sideloading is a crucial defense line. If Google is allowed to proceed with implementing these restrictions, users will likely get funneled into using its proprietary app store, forced to share personal information like age and biometric data that links back to them for targeted ads and surveillance. Google's push for limiting sideloading is a textbook case of anti-competitiveness as well. The danger of this change can be summed up in an analogy: if some people occasionally get food poisoning from non-vetted sources, should we altogether limit food access to vendors that are deemed as, 'approved' or 'verified' by a multibillion-dollar, anti-consumer corporation? If this decision doesn't get shot down, there is a risk of being forced to give up personal privacy, autonomy, and choice. "
Matthew, change.org
"This is a spit in the face of open-source and Android's userbase. "
Mark, change.org
"The ability to install APKs are a core feature in Android's open nature. It also helps developers to freely test and debug their apps. Installing APKs should be completely free and allowed. Thanks to everyone who made me see this project. Do you want me to draw this as a support material? Thanks. "
Emir, change.org
"Don't be Apple! "
Wenshan, change.org
"Android has always been my favorite platform because I can download apps externally, often community-created apps with various benefits. Removing this option from Android is like erasing its very essence. "
Davi, change.org
"I switched to Android to escape Apple's aggressively anti-consumer walled garden. My S20 Ultra (that I paid over $1600 for, after tax) is finally starting to show it's age, but now I have no incentive to get another android device for my next smartphone if you follow through with these changes. I've been a vocal supporter of Android for years, but if you don't scrap this change, I will boycott Alphabet products altogether and do my best to ensure as many others as possible are well-informed on why they should do the same. "
Jacob, change.org
"This is ridiculous the fact that google is causing this will effect everybody it's gonna make it way harder for developers to post there apps to specific users. "
Daisuke, change.org
"This is not just a threat for programmers and startups but a threat to existing programmers/Co's. they intend to possibly blacklist. No different conceptually than the game they are playing against journalists currently as we have all seen being done. Accepting this type of centralized control says you support fascism and censorship type tactics and exploitative mechanisms that create monopolies at it's core roots. "
Eric, change.org
"It doesn't surprise me to hear that GOOGLE is going to do this. It's not about creating something that could possibly be of benefit anymore. The all mighty dollar has to raise it's ugly head now days or it's just not worth doing. "
Ralph, change.org
"I don't know what words will reach the ones that need to hear them. I'll just say I'm willing to switch, drop, or do what I think works for me. "
Daniel, change.org
"This is literally why I switched to android. The literal only reason. "
Ari Siobhan, change.org
"The openness of the Android is its unique selling point. Keep Android open to keep Android Android. "
John, change.org
"We need to keep Android open! "
Caleb, change.org
"ê°ì¥ í° ê°ì ì ë´ë¤ë²ë¦¬ë íìì´ë¤. ì¸ì¦ì íê³ë¡ ì¼ë§ë ë§ì 컨í ì¸ ë¤ì´ ì ê·¼ ë¶ê°ë¥í´ì§ì§ ìê°íë©´ í¬ê² ê±±ì ì´ë¤. "
CH, change.org
"Keep Android an open platform, avoid a massive class action lawsuit. I along many others bought an android phone precisely because of the open ecosystem, you change that, you get sued and lose customers "
Joseph, change.org
"Android began as the open-source, mod-friendly underdog in the cell phone market years ago. I watched it as it grew into a thriving scene where we could brag to our Apple-loyal friends about the freedom we had in our platform, the platform we bolstered up and supported and went against the culture at the time to get behind. Over time, it's become less and less free and open; locking bootloaders, denying permission to access all of the storage we pay for on our devices, penalizing power users who root their phones by disabling basic functionality, and now that their Play Store monopoly has been called out for what it is Google, so desperately in need of more money than they earn from collecting and selling all of our private data to finance their AI ambitions, which are trained on all of our data in the first place, is locking down the user's ability to control how they can utilize the device they own even further, just so they can have a say (and a fee collected) in every application that others produce for what used to be a truly open-source platform. It's disgusting how for ensh*tification has gone. These are Our devices. We pay for them. They are ours to have to replace, to finance, to insure, to charge, and to use. You should have a say in literally every single aspect of how they're used, and exploiting small developers under the guise of "security" is just pathetic. "
Sheldon, change.org
"Play Integrity, Custom ROM/Root discrimination because of that, and now this? What have you BECOME, Google? You're not helping anyone, and I don't even think it helps them. If I had to pick between an unmodded Galaxy S25 (or whatever the latest one is) and a modded Galaxy S10, I'm picking the S25. It doesn't influence sales, all it does it make life harder, for everyone. Including the people imposing the restrictions, HEY, WHAT A COINCIDENCE! Just stop making the available mobile operating systems "iOS, iOS 2, and the other manufacturers' versions of iOS 2." I've talked more about custom ROMs, but replace it with customs apps and the same point is easily carried over. And because the 2 are interconnected in nature of them both being stuff that Google might not like. "
Gavin, change.org
"Nós vencemos Google idiota ððððð "
Bruno, change.org
"What's the joke about Android being another iOS? Sure, you can find whatever you want on the Play Store as long as it's there, but there are junk apps and paid apps that ask you to doxx yourself and tell them where you live and everything else. No, where's the freedom in that that Android always had? .... Another iOS? No. "
mike, change.org
"As a certified Android glazer I think age verification is stupid and Android should stay open forever "
Anony, change.org
"Prohibition is not the way to safety and health. Good UX is enough to allow power user to own their devices. Don't listen to excuses from big corporations that play the victims, while they treat their users like disposables, in order to maximize their profits. Android must stay open. "
Lorenzo, change.org