Skip to content

Conversation

@hackerwins
Copy link
Member

@hackerwins hackerwins commented Sep 21, 2024

What does this PR do / why do we need it?

  • Update copyright information and fix lint warnings

Which issue(s) this PR fixes?

Fixes #<issue_number>

Any background context you want to provide?

  • N/A

Screenshot (if appropriate)

  • N/A

Checklist

  • Added relevant tests or not required
  • Not submitting changes made to the files in dist/
  • Didn't break anything

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

  • Documentation

    • Updated the contribution guidelines to clarify that changes should only be made to files in the src/ folder, avoiding the dist/ folder.
    • Improved the pull request template for better clarity, including prompts for feature descriptions and issue tracking.
  • Style

    • Minor formatting adjustments made in various test files to enhance code readability.
  • Chores

    • Updated copyright information in configuration files.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 21, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request includes updates to copyright information in the webpack.production.js file, enhancing clarity in the codebase. Additionally, it features formatting adjustments in the Bullet.js file for improved readability. Several test files (dom.spec.js, func.spec.js, key.spec.js, lists.spec.js, and range.spec.js) have had their initial comment blocks removed, which contained metadata about the files, leaving the test logic intact. Furthermore, the contribution guidelines in .github/CONTRIBUTING.md have been clarified regarding file submissions.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
config/webpack.production.js Updated copyright information in const banner and const minBanner variables.
src/js/editing/Bullet.js Adjusted indentation of parameters in the dom.splitTree function for better readability.
test/base/core/*.spec.js Removed comment blocks at the beginning of each test file, retaining the test logic unchanged.
.github/CONTRIBUTING.md Clarified contribution guidelines regarding file submissions, emphasizing not to include dist/ files.
.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md Modified template for clarity, including new sections and rephrased instructions for contributors.

Possibly related PRs

Poem

🐰 In the code where bunnies hop,
Changes made, we can't stop!
Copyrights updated, neat and bright,
Indents fixed, oh what a sight!
Tests are clean, no comments there,
Hopping forward, with code to share! 🌟


Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between cda408d and 31447d9.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • .github/CONTRIBUTING.md (1 hunks)
  • .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (6)
.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md (5)

2-4: LGTM!

The updated comment block enhances clarity and provides better guidance to contributors. The phrasing and structure are appropriate.


6-9: LGTM!

The expanded section prompts contributors to provide more detailed information about the feature or bug fix and its necessity. This will greatly assist reviewers in understanding the purpose and impact of the PR. The phrasing and structure are appropriate.


11-13: LGTM!

Replacing the "Where should the reviewer start?" section with "Which issue(s) this PR fixes?" aligns the template better with common issue tracking practices. The placeholder for issue numbers provides clear guidance on linking the PR to relevant issues. The phrasing and structure are appropriate.


19-21: LGTM!

Modifying the screenshot section title to "Screenshot (if appropriate)" broadens its applicability beyond just frontend changes. The addition of the "N/A" placeholder allows contributors to indicate if a screenshot is not necessary. The phrasing and structure are appropriate.


26-26: LGTM!

The new checklist item reinforces the guideline to not submit changes to the dist/ folder. This helps maintain the integrity of the distribution files and keeps the focus on source code changes. The phrasing and structure are appropriate.

.github/CONTRIBUTING.md (1)

16-18: LGTM!

The changes to the contribution guidelines provide clearer instructions to contributors regarding the handling of files within the repository. The updated text explicitly states that contributions should only involve files located in the src/ folder and not the dist/ folder. This enhances the clarity of the guidelines and helps ensure that contributors submit changes to the appropriate files.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    -- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    -- Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    -- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    -- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    -- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    -- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants