If we decide to officially support LoongArch, then we need to keep maintaining it.
To do so, we also need to maintain a CI environment.
So far, I have taken on the work for free, but I cannot do it any more.
We need you to bear the labor and expense for this.

If we decide to officially support LoongArch, then we need to keep maintaining it. To do so, we also need to maintain a CI environment. So far, I have taken on the work for free, but I cannot do it any more. We need you to bear the labor and expense for this.

I cannot afford the CI since I also do my work for free. 😂😂😂 Is it possible to classify different architectures into different support levels? (Maybe keep some architectures of which test results that don't guarantee) If not, I can also try to contact Loongson to afford this.

I cannot provide ongoing support for free.
If no one is willing to cover the cost, please just fork the project and support LoongArch at your repo.

I cannot provide ongoing support for free. If no one is willing to cover the cost, please just fork the project and support LoongArch at your repo.

Sigh. As an open source software developer, I completely understand your thoughts. But as a downstream Linux distribution maintainer without financial support, I am also unwilling to bear too much ongoing maintenance costs, so I am unwilling to fork this project. I have already told Loongson about the importance of your project, so let's wait for Loongson's response. 😊😊😊