Skip to content

Conversation

@mchhoy
Copy link
Contributor

@mchhoy mchhoy commented Dec 13, 2023

Feel free to remove wait_for_inter_process_subscribers in particular ..

@m-dahl
Copy link
Collaborator

m-dahl commented Dec 14, 2023

There is a similar construct implemented in waiting for a service to be available, which also does not emit any events. I poll those in spin() and complete the respective "wait for" future when they become available. This way we don't need to depend on futures-timer.

@mchhoy
Copy link
Contributor Author

mchhoy commented Dec 15, 2023

Ok thanks will revise soon

@mchhoy
Copy link
Contributor Author

mchhoy commented Dec 27, 2023

@m-dahl Could you take a look now?

@m-dahl m-dahl merged commit 3d6936e into sequenceplanner:master Dec 27, 2023
@m-dahl
Copy link
Collaborator

m-dahl commented Dec 27, 2023

Looks good now!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants