Simplify control flow when exiting the interpreter.#17756
Merged
markshannon merged 1 commit intopython:masterfrom Jan 13, 2020
Merged
Simplify control flow when exiting the interpreter.#17756markshannon merged 1 commit intopython:masterfrom
markshannon merged 1 commit intopython:masterfrom
Conversation
pablogsal
approved these changes
Dec 30, 2019
Member
Out of curiosity, in which PR/issue was this changed? |
Member
Author
Member
|
Thanks, Mark! |
sthagen
added a commit
to sthagen/python-cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 13, 2020
Cleanup exit code for interpreter. (pythonGH-17756)
shihai1991
pushed a commit
to shihai1991/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 31, 2020
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Skip the stack emptying step for RETURN_VALUE, as the compiler now ensures that the stack is empty.
Remove test that generates invalid bytecode.
Maybe we should have a bytecode verifier, but that's not the job of the interpreter.
No change in behaviour, so no news or BPO issue needed.