Simplify ossl_namemap_name2num with ossl_namemap_name2num_n#30524
Open
jogme wants to merge 1 commit intoopenssl:masterfrom
Open
Simplify ossl_namemap_name2num with ossl_namemap_name2num_n#30524jogme wants to merge 1 commit intoopenssl:masterfrom
jogme wants to merge 1 commit intoopenssl:masterfrom
Conversation
jogme
added
approval: review pending
Contributor
Author
|
Not sure if we backport refactors; please correct the labels if not. Just to note here, 3.0 and 3.3 has a different version still with the strndup. |
github-actions
bot
added
the
severity: fips change
The two functions do the same; there is no reason to maintain duplicit code. Signed-off-by: Norbert Pocs <[email protected]>
jogme
force-pushed
the
ossl_namemap_name2num-merge
branch
from
dc88488 to
d672088
Compare
fwh-dc
approved these changes
Mar 22, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The two functions do the same; there is no reason to maintain duplicit
code.
Checklist