Skip to content

Conversation

@wangxingjun778
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @wangxingjun778, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request enhances the robustness of the set_repo_visibility function by implementing explicit input validation for the visibility argument. The change ensures that only 'private' or 'public' are accepted values, preventing potential issues arising from incorrect visibility settings and providing clearer error messages to users.

Highlights

  • Input Validation: Added a ValueError check within the set_repo_visibility function to ensure that the visibility argument is strictly either 'private' or 'public'. This prevents invalid visibility settings from being processed.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request adds a validation check for the visibility argument in the set_repo_visibility method, which is a good improvement. My review includes a suggestion to use predefined constants for visibility values to enhance code maintainability and avoid using magic strings.

Comment on lines +2904 to +2905
if visibility not in ['private', 'public']:
raise ValueError(f'Invalid visibility: {visibility}, supported visibilities: `private`, `public`')
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

For better maintainability and to avoid magic strings, it's recommended to use the Visibility constants that are already defined and imported. This ensures that if the visibility values ever change, you only need to update them in one place.

Suggested change
if visibility not in ['private', 'public']:
raise ValueError(f'Invalid visibility: {visibility}, supported visibilities: `private`, `public`')
if visibility not in [Visibility.PRIVATE, Visibility.PUBLIC]:
raise ValueError(f'Invalid visibility: {visibility}, supported visibilities: `{Visibility.PRIVATE}`, `{Visibility.PUBLIC}`')

@wangxingjun778 wangxingjun778 merged commit 13d8f27 into modelscope:master Dec 10, 2025
1 of 2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants