Control Flow Node Monomorphization

#57977

• All CFG nodes (FlowNodes) are now created by the same function, and all have the same shape.
• 4 fields: flags, id, node (basically a payload), antecedent (a possible node or array of nodes)
  • node might be an syntax node or some other piece of data (e.g. FlowSwitchClauseData)
• The effect of this was probably 0.5-1% of all compile time, but every little bit helps!

Removing Effects-Free Blocks from Control Flow Graph

#58013

• The control flow graph is often filled with nodes that have no effect over subsequent nodes.
  • In some cases, "downstream" nodes would be better-served to skip over certain nodes.
• If a stretch of flow nodes has no effect or interruption/termination, then its antecedent can be used in place of the node itself.
  • What is an effect/termination?
    • Assignments like x = ...
    • throw or return
    • Top-level functions (they could be assertion functions like f(x: any): asserts x or exit(): never)
• Does this change mean that you can't walk back from every termination point to find all references?
  • No
  • Because we were thinking about using the CFG for definite assignment
    • Well that you can do!
• This eliminates stuff like optional chains and lots of different things that can cause the graph to be bushy
  • It doesn't really affect ifs since most of those have effects.
  • In fact, the PR might not even bother to optimize those if statements?
    • Tried this in the compiler, very few cases where this optimization would kick in.

Region-Based Semantic Diagnostics

#57393
#57842

• Today, when the editor sends a request for diagnostics (errors), it sends a list of files that are open.
  • TypeScript sends syntactic diagnostics from the parser, and then semantic diagnostics from the type checker.
• With this PR, the editor can specify a visible region.
  • The syntactic diagnostics are sent in-whole, but the semantic diagnostics may come back in a partial state followed by the full diagnostics for a specific file.
• For checker.ts, a full check of the file shrinks down from ~3300ms to ~140ms.
• But what are the tradeoffs?
  • Users can see different diagnostics based on checking order.
    • How much we elaborate, specific error messages, etc.
• This is a tradeoff between speed and accuracy.
  • The user can see the diagnostics faster, but they might not be the same as what would have happened checking top-down.
• One thing to think about is that we can cache the diagnostics themselves.
• Are all of the cases we decide not to do elaboration just cases where we're relating?
  • It's mostly type comparison because we don't want to do structural checks.
• One of the reasons we decided not to elaborate was in the command-line compiler, where you don't want these massive errors repeated over and over.
  • Not sure if we agree with that in the editor scenarios.
• One of the issues was is that elaboration is relatively expensive, and the cache is supposed to avoid this work.
  • But the intermediate diagnostics are cached and they were made to work this way - just linked lists of elaborations.
• How does this work with an input range that partially overlaps with a range?
  • Finds the list of source elements that overlaps.
• What is the bigger UX problem here?
  • The deduplication doesn't work because the diagnostics differ between checks.
    • Could try to exclude the original span of nodes that were originally checked.
      • Might be possible to do that, but there are checks we can only do when we look at the whole file.
        • Export checks, for example.
        • Still worth exploring.
  • So you end up with two close-ish error message that are actually caused by the same error.
  • The position of the error might also be different.
    • e.g. JSX errors that get issued on the first-checked JSX tag rather than the first JSX tag in the file.
• TSServer ultimately decides what to send back to the editor.
  • Could decide to check the whole file instead of the region if the region is the entire file.
  • Could also decide to check the whole file if the region is small enough.
• Is there a way to know if noticeable inconsistencies kick in when doing the full check sweep?
  • We've been testing this with the top 200 repos.