Feature-complete OpenAI client for Rust, Node.js, and Python.
Streaming, WebSockets, structured outputs, WASM. Built for agentic workflows.
openai-oxide implements the full Responses API, Chat Completions, and 20+ other endpoints with persistent WebSockets, hedged requests, early-parsing for function calls, and type-safe Structured Outputs. Types are provided by the standalone openai-types crate (1100+ types, auto-synced from the Python SDK).
Included:
- Structured Outputs (
parse::<T>()): Auto-generates JSON schema from Rust types viaschemarsand deserializes the response in one call.parse::<MyStruct>(). Works with Chat and Responses APIs. - Stream Helpers: High-level
ChatStreamEventwith automatic text/tool-call accumulation, typedContentDelta/ToolCallDoneevents,get_final_completion(), andcurrent_content()snapshots. No manual chunk stitching. - Streaming: Incremental SSE parser with buffered line extraction and standard anti-buffering headers (
Accept: text/event-stream,Cache-Control: no-cache). - WebSocket Mode + Connection Pool: Persistent
wss://connection for the Responses API with built-in connection pooling (WsPool). OpenAI reports up to ~40% faster end-to-end for 20+ tool call chains. Our preliminary measurements (29-44%, n=5) align with this. The only Rust client that implements this endpoint. - Stream FC Early Parse: Yields function calls the exact moment
arguments.doneis emitted, letting you start executing local tools before the overall response finishes. - Hardware-Accelerated JSON (
simd): Opt-in AVX2/NEON vector instructions for faster JSON parsing of large payloads (agent histories, complex tool calls). - Hedged Requests: Send redundant requests and cancel the slower ones. Trades extra tokens for lower tail latency (technique from Google's "The Tail at Scale").
- Webhook Verification: HMAC-SHA256 signature verification with timestamp tolerance check (rejects stale requests).
- HTTP Tuning: gzip, TCP_NODELAY, HTTP/2 keep-alive with adaptive window, connection pooling, all enabled by default.
- WASM Support: Compiles to
wasm32-unknown-unknown. Streaming, JSON request retries, and early-parsing work in Cloudflare Workers and browsers. Limitations: no multipart uploads, no gzip/HTTP/2 (browser handles these), streaming retries are not yet implemented. Live demo. - Node.js & Python bindings: Native napi-rs (Node) and PyO3 (Python) bindings as separate packages. Structured outputs via Zod (Node) and Pydantic v2 (Python). On mock benchmarks, the Node bindings show 2-3x faster SDK overhead vs official
openainpm (p<0.001).
The Rust crate is the single source of truth. Bindings for other platforms are thin wrappers:
| Platform | Binding | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Rust | native | stable |
| Node.js / TypeScript | napi-rs | stable |
| Python | PyO3 + maturin | stable |
| Browser / Edge / Dioxus / Leptos | WASM (wasm32-unknown-unknown) |
stable |
| iOS / macOS | UniFFI (Swift) | planned |
| Android | UniFFI (Kotlin) | planned |
This means the same HTTP tuning, WebSocket pool, streaming parser, and retry logic run everywhere. No reimplementation per language, no behavior drift. When we add a feature to the Rust core, all platforms get it.
The practical consequence: you can embed openai-oxide as the AI layer in a cross-platform app. For example, rust-code uses sgr-agent (built on openai-oxide) as a TUI coding agent today, and the same crate can be compiled to WASM and run in a browser.
On today's OpenAI API (200ms-2s per call), SDK overhead is <1% of wall time. But that's changing:
- Fast inference providers (Cerebras, Groq, local models) return responses in 10-50ms. At those speeds, SDK overhead (0.1-5ms) becomes 5-30% of wall time.
- Agent farms running hundreds of parallel agents create thousands of requests per second. Per-request overhead compounds fast.
- Structured outputs + function calling add serialization and schema generation on every call. In Rust, this runs without GC pauses.
The mock benchmarks show the trajectory: oxide's SDK overhead is 2-3x lower than the official JS SDK on small payloads (p<0.001). As APIs get faster, that gap becomes the bottleneck.
OpenAI offers a WebSocket mode for the Responses API at wss://api.openai.com/v1/responses. The connection stays open across multiple turns, and the server uses connection-local caching to speed up continuations. Requests are sequential (one in-flight at a time per connection), but each turn benefits from the server keeping the previous response state in memory.
HTTP (warm connection — TLS reused via pool)
Request 1 (ls) : [HTTP/2 req] -> [Server loads ctx] -> [Generate] -> [Parse] -> [Exec Tool]
Request 2 (cat) : [HTTP/2 req] -> [Server loads ctx] -> [Generate] -> [Parse] -> [Exec Tool]
WebSocket (persistent connection — server caches context)
Connection : [WS Upgrade] (once)
Request 1 (ls) : [Send JSON] -> [Generate] -> [Parse] -> [Exec Tool]
Request 2 (cat) : [Send JSON] -> [Ctx cached] -> [Generate] -> [Parse] -> [Exec Tool]
The speed improvement comes primarily from the server side (connection-local caching, reduced continuation overhead), not from saving a few bytes of HTTP/2 framing on the client. OpenAI reports up to ~40% faster for chains with 20+ tool calls.
Our preliminary measurements (gpt-5.4, warm connections, n=5):
- Plain text: 710ms WS vs 1011ms HTTP (29% faster)
- Multi-turn (2 reqs): 1425ms vs 2362ms (40% faster)
- Rapid-fire (5 calls): 3227ms vs 5807ms (44% faster)
Preliminary at n=5 — direction matches OpenAI's published numbers.
WebSocket mode is compatible with Zero Data Retention (ZDR) and store: false. Context is cached in-memory only for the lifetime of the connection, with no disk persistence.
Separately, Stream FC Early Parse (works on both HTTP and WebSocket) lets you start executing tool calls the moment arguments are complete, before the stream closes, saving additional time in function-calling loops.
cargo add openai-oxide tokio --features tokio/fullnpm install openai-oxide
# or
pnpm add openai-oxide
# or
yarn add openai-oxideSupported platforms: macOS (x64, arm64), Linux (x64, arm64, glibc & musl), Windows (x64).
pip install openai-oxide
# or
uv pip install openai-oxide| Package | Registry | Link |
|---|---|---|
openai-oxide |
crates.io | crates.io/crates/openai-oxide |
openai-types |
crates.io | crates.io/crates/openai-types |
openai-oxide |
npm | npmjs.com/package/openai-oxide |
openai-oxide |
PyPI | pypi.org/project/openai-oxide |
openai-oxide-macros |
crates.io | crates.io/crates/openai-oxide-macros |
use openai_oxide::{OpenAI, types::responses::*};
#[tokio::main]
async fn main() -> Result<(), openai_oxide::OpenAIError> {
let client = OpenAI::from_env()?; // Uses OPENAI_API_KEY
let response = client.responses().create(
ResponseCreateRequest::new("gpt-5.4")
.input("Explain quantum computing in one sentence.")
.max_output_tokens(100)
).await?;
println!("{}", response.output_text());
Ok(())
}const { Client } = require("openai-oxide");
const client = new Client(); // Uses OPENAI_API_KEY
const text = await client.createText("gpt-5.4-mini", "Hello from Node!");
console.log(text);import asyncio, json
from openai_oxide import Client
async def main():
client = Client() # Uses OPENAI_API_KEY
res = json.loads(await client.create("gpt-5.4-mini", "Hello from Python!"))
print(res["text"])
asyncio.run(main())- Environment: macOS (M-series), release mode.
- Model:
gpt-5.4via the official OpenAI API. - Protocol: TLS + HTTP/2 with connection pooling (warm connections).
- Methodology: n=5 per run, 3 runs, median of medians. At n=5, differences <15% are within API jitter. Date: 2026-03-24.
openai-oxide vs async-openai 0.34 vs genai 0.6-beta. All via Responses API (genai uses Chat API, it's a multi-provider adapter).
| Test | openai-oxide |
async-openai |
genai |
Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plain text | 1011ms | 960ms | 835ms | oxide slower |
| Structured output | 1331ms | N/A | 1197ms | within noise |
| Function calling | 1192ms | 1748ms | 1030ms | genai fastest |
| Multi-turn (2 reqs) | 2362ms | 3275ms | 1641ms | genai fastest |
| Streaming TTFT | 645ms | 685ms | 670ms | within noise |
| Parallel 3x | 1165ms | 1053ms | 866ms | oxide slower |
At n=5 with live API calls, no single SDK consistently wins. Differences <15% are API jitter. genai is fastest on plain text (it skips full response deserialization). oxide wins function calling and streaming TTFT. On today's API latencies (800-1100ms), SDK overhead is negligible for all three. The difference grows with faster backends and higher concurrency (see "When SDK speed starts to matter" above).
Feature comparison:
| Feature | openai-oxide |
async-openai 0.34 |
genai 0.6 |
|---|---|---|---|
| SSE streaming | yes | yes | yes |
| Stream helpers (typed events) | yes | no | no |
| WebSocket mode for Responses API | yes | no | no |
Structured parse::<T>() with schema gen |
yes | no | no |
| WASM (streaming, no multipart) | yes | partial (no streaming) | no |
| Node.js / Python bindings | yes | no | no |
| Hedged requests | yes | no | no |
| Stream FC early parse | yes | no | no |
| Webhook verification | yes | yes | no |
Reproduce: cd benchmarks/rust-compare && cargo run --release
Native PyO3 bindings vs openai (openai 2.29.0).
| Test | openai-oxide |
openai |
Diff | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plain text | 845ms | 997ms | +15% | |
| Structured output | 1367ms | 1379ms | +1% | within API noise |
| Function calling | 1195ms | 1230ms | +3% | within API noise |
| Multi-turn (2 reqs) | 2260ms | 3089ms | +27% | |
| Web search | 3157ms | 3499ms | +10% | within API noise |
| Nested structured | 5377ms | 5339ms | -1% | within API noise |
| Agent loop (2-step) | 4570ms | 5144ms | +11% | within API noise |
| Rapid-fire (5 calls) | 5667ms | 6136ms | +8% | within API noise |
| Prompt-cached | 4425ms | 5564ms | +20% | |
| Streaming TTFT | 626ms | 638ms | +2% | within API noise |
| Parallel 3x | 1184ms | 1090ms | -9% | within API noise |
| Hedged (2x race) | 893ms | 995ms | +10% | within API noise |
median of medians, 3x5 iterations (n=5 per measurement). Model: gpt-5.4. Date: 2026-03-24. Not re-measured since — results may have shifted. Differences <15% are within API jitter at this sample size and should not be treated as statistically significant.
Reproduce: cd openai-oxide-python && uv run python ../examples/bench_python.py
Native napi-rs bindings vs official openai npm. n=5 per run, 3 runs — differences <15% are within API noise.
| Test | openai-oxide |
openai |
Diff | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plain text | 1075ms | 1311ms | -18% | |
| Structured output | 1370ms | 1765ms | -22% | |
| Function calling | 1725ms | 1832ms | -6% | within API noise |
| Multi-turn (2 reqs) | 2283ms | 2859ms | -20% | |
| Rapid-fire (5 calls) | 6246ms | 6936ms | -10% | within API noise |
| Streaming TTFT | 534ms | 580ms | -8% | within API noise |
| Parallel 3x | 1937ms | 1991ms | -3% | within API noise |
| WebSocket hot pair | 2181ms | N/A | — | preliminary, needs reproducible script |
median of medians, 3×5 iterations. Model: gpt-5.4. Date: 2026-03-24. At n=5 with ~200ms API jitter, only >15% differences are meaningful.
Reproduce: cd openai-oxide-node && BENCH_ITERATIONS=5 node examples/bench_node.js
The live benchmarks above include network latency and model inference, which adds noise. To isolate pure SDK overhead, we also run a synthetic benchmark with a localhost mock server (zero network, zero inference). Fixtures are captured from a real coding agent session (320 messages, 42 tools, 718KB request body).
| Test | openai-oxide |
openai npm |
oxide faster | sig |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tiny req → Tiny resp | 172µs | 443µs | +61% | *** |
| Tiny req → Structured 5KB | 161µs | 499µs | +68% | *** |
| Medium 150KB → Tool call | 1.1ms | 1.7ms | +37% | *** |
| Heavy 657KB → Real agent resp | 4.9ms | 6.2ms | +21% | *** |
| SSE stream (114 real chunks) | 283µs | 742µs | +62% | *** |
| Agent 20x sequential (tiny) | 2.1ms | 5.4ms | +61% | *** |
| Agent 10x sequential (heavy) | 51.7ms | 62.2ms | +17% | *** |
50 iterations, 20 warmup, --expose-gc, Welch's t-test — all p<0.001.
Note: the mock server uses HTTP/1.1, so these results measure SDK serialization/parsing overhead, not HTTP/2 multiplexing benefits.
Where oxide is faster: everything on mock, 17-68% depending on payload size. SSE streaming 62% faster. Agent loops compound: 20 tiny calls save 3.3ms, 10 heavy calls save 10.5ms.
When it matters: today, with 200ms-2s API latency, SDK overhead is <1% of wall time. But with fast inference (Cerebras, Groq, local models at 10-50ms) or agent farms running hundreds of concurrent sessions, these savings add up. The mock benchmarks show the floor: oxide's overhead is consistently 2-3x lower.
Reproduce: node --expose-gc benchmarks/bench_science.js
import asyncio
from openai_oxide import Client
async def main():
client = Client()
# 1. Standard request
res = await client.create("gpt-5.4", "Hello!")
print(res["text"])
# 2. Streaming (Async Iterator)
stream = await client.create_stream("gpt-5.4", "Explain quantum computing...", max_output_tokens=200)
async for event in stream:
print(event)
asyncio.run(main())The server caches context locally for WebSocket connections, speeding up continuations. Both HTTP and WebSocket reuse TCP+TLS via connection pooling. The speed gain is server-side, not from saving HTTP/2 framing bytes.
let client = OpenAI::from_env()?;
let mut session = client.ws_session().await?;
// All calls route through the same wss:// connection
let r1 = session.send(
ResponseCreateRequest::new("gpt-5.4").input("My name is Rustam.").store(true)
).await?;
let r2 = session.send(
ResponseCreateRequest::new("gpt-5.4").input("What's my name?").previous_response_id(&r1.id)
).await?;
session.close().await?;Start executing your local functions instantly when the model finishes generating the arguments, rather than waiting for the entire stream to close.
let mut handle = client.responses().create_stream_fc(request).await?;
while let Some(fc) = handle.recv().await {
// Fires immediately on `arguments.done`
let result = execute_tool(&fc.name, &fc.arguments).await;
}Protect your application against random network latency spikes.
use openai_oxide::hedged_request;
use std::time::Duration;
// Sends 2 identical requests with a 1.5s delay. Returns whichever finishes first.
let response = hedged_request(&client, request, Some(Duration::from_secs(2))).await?;Send 3 concurrent requests; the total wall time is equal to the slowest single request. Uses HTTP/2 multiplexing when connecting to OpenAI (the real API supports HTTP/2), but note that local mock servers typically use HTTP/1.1.
let (c1, c2, c3) = (client.clone(), client.clone(), client.clone());
let (r1, r2, r3) = tokio::join!(
async { c1.responses().create(req1).await },
async { c2.responses().create(req2).await },
async { c3.responses().create(req3).await },
);Auto-generate JSON schemas for your functions.
use openai_oxide_macros::openai_tool;
#[openai_tool(description = "Get the current weather")]
fn get_weather(location: String, unit: Option<String>) -> String {
format!("Weather in {location}")
}
// The macro generates `get_weather_tool()` which returns the `serde_json::Value` schema
let tool = get_weather_tool();Native NAPI-RS bindings. Requests and stream events execute in Rust and cross into the V8 event loop with minimal overhead.
const { Client } = require("openai-oxide");
(async () => {
const client = new Client();
const session = await client.wsSession();
const res = await session.send("gpt-5.4-mini", "Say hello to Rust from Node!");
console.log(res);
await session.close();
})();At the moment, the Node bindings expose Chat Completions, Responses, streaming helpers, and WebSocket sessions. The full API matrix below refers to the Rust core crate.
| API | Method |
|---|---|
| Chat Completions | client.chat().completions().create() / create_stream() |
| Responses | client.responses().create() / create_stream() / create_stream_fc() |
| Responses Tools | Function, WebSearch, FileSearch, CodeInterpreter, ComputerUse, Mcp, ImageGeneration |
| WebSocket | client.ws_session() — send / send_stream / warmup / close |
| Hedged | hedged_request() / hedged_request_n() / speculative() |
| Embeddings | client.embeddings().create() |
| Models | client.models().list() / retrieve() / delete() |
| Images | client.images().generate() / edit() / create_variation() |
| Audio | client.audio().transcriptions() / translations() / speech() |
| Files | client.files().create() / list() / retrieve() / delete() / content() |
| Fine-tuning | client.fine_tuning().jobs().create() / list() / cancel() / list_events() |
| Moderations | client.moderations().create() |
| Batches | client.batches().create() / list() / retrieve() / cancel() |
| Uploads | client.uploads().create() / add_part() / cancel() / complete() |
| Conversations | client.conversations() CRUD + items CRUD |
| Videos (Sora) | client.videos() create / list / retrieve / delete / content / edit / extend / remix |
| Pagination | list_page() / list_auto() — cursor-based, async stream |
| Webhooks | Webhooks::new(secret).verify() / .unwrap() (feature: webhooks) |
| Assistants (beta) | Full CRUD + list_page() / list_auto() |
| Threads (beta) | client.beta().threads() CRUD + messages list_page() / list_auto() |
| Runs (beta) | client.beta().runs(thread_id) CRUD + steps + submit_tool_outputs |
| Vector Stores (beta) | client.beta().vector_stores() CRUD + search() + list_page() / list_auto() |
| Realtime (beta) | client.beta().realtime().sessions().create() |
Every endpoint is gated behind a Cargo feature. If you are building for WebAssembly (WASM) (e.g., Cloudflare Workers, Dioxus, Leptos), you can significantly reduce your .wasm binary size and compilation time by disabling default features and only compiling what you need.
[dependencies]
# Example: Compile ONLY the Responses API (removes Audio, Images, Assistants, etc.)
openai-oxide = { version = "0.11", default-features = false, features = ["responses"] }chat— Chat Completionsresponses— Responses API (Supports WebSocket)embeddings— Text Embeddingsimages— Image Generation (DALL-E)audio— TTS and Transcriptionfiles— File managementfine-tuning— Model Fine-tuningmodels— Model listingmoderations— Moderation APIbatches— Batch APIuploads— Upload APIbeta— Assistants, Threads, Vector Stores, Realtime API
structured— Enablesparse::<T>()with auto-generated JSON schema viaschemarswebhooks— Enables webhook signature verification (HMAC-SHA256)macros— Enables#[openai_tool]proc macro for tool schema generationwebsocket— Enables Realtime API over WebSockets (Native:tokio-tungstenite)websocket-wasm— Enables Realtime API over WebSockets (WASM:gloo-net/web-sys)simd— Enablessimd-jsonfor hardware-accelerated JSON deserialization (AVX2/NEON, stable Rust)
Check out our Cloudflare Worker Examples showcasing a Full-Stack Rust app with a Dioxus frontend and a Cloudflare Worker Durable Object backend holding a WebSocket connection to OpenAI.
OpenAI's official guides apply directly. Here's how each maps to openai-oxide:
| OpenAI Guide | Rust | Node.js | Python |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chat Completions | client.chat().completions().create() |
client.createChatCompletion({...}) |
await client.create(model, input) |
| Responses API | client.responses().create() |
client.createText(model, input) |
await client.create(model, input) |
| Streaming | client.responses().create_stream() |
client.createStream({...}, cb) |
await client.create_stream(model, input) |
| Function Calling | client.responses().create_stream_fc() |
client.createResponse({model, input, tools}) |
await client.create_with_tools(model, input, tools) |
| Structured Output | client.chat().completions().parse::<T>() |
client.createChatParsed(req, name, schema) |
await client.create_parsed(model, input, PydanticModel) |
| Embeddings | client.embeddings().create() |
via createResponse() raw |
via create_raw() |
| Image Generation | client.images().generate() |
via createResponse() raw |
via create_raw() |
| Text-to-Speech | client.audio().speech().create() |
via createResponse() raw |
via create_raw() |
| Speech-to-Text | client.audio().transcriptions().create() |
via createResponse() raw |
via create_raw() |
| Fine-tuning | client.fine_tuning().jobs().create() |
via createResponse() raw |
via create_raw() |
| Conversations | client.conversations() CRUD + items |
via raw | via raw |
| Video Generation (Sora) | client.videos() create/edit/extend/remix |
via raw | via raw |
| Webhooks | Webhooks::new(secret).verify() |
— | — |
| Realtime API | client.ws_session() |
client.wsSession() |
— |
| Assistants | client.beta().assistants() |
via raw | via raw |
Tip: Parameter names match the official Python SDK exactly. If OpenAI docs show
model="gpt-5.4", use.model("gpt-5.4")in Rust or{model: "gpt-5.4"}in Node.js.Note: Node.js and Python bindings have typed helpers for Responses, Chat, Streaming, Function Calling, and Structured Output. All other endpoints are available via the raw JSON methods (
createResponse()/create_raw()) which accept any OpenAI API request body.
use openai_oxide::{OpenAI, config::ClientConfig};
use openai_oxide::azure::AzureConfig;
let client = OpenAI::new("sk-..."); // Explicit key
let client = OpenAI::with_config( // Custom config
ClientConfig::new("sk-...").base_url("https://...").timeout_secs(30).max_retries(3)
);
let client = OpenAI::azure(AzureConfig::new() // Azure OpenAI
.azure_endpoint("https://my.openai.azure.com").azure_deployment("gpt-4").api_key("...")
)?;Get typed, validated responses directly from the model. No manual JSON parsing.
use openai_oxide::parsing::ParsedChatCompletion;
use schemars::JsonSchema;
use serde::Deserialize;
#[derive(Deserialize, JsonSchema)]
struct MathAnswer {
steps: Vec<String>,
final_answer: String,
}
// Chat API
let result: ParsedChatCompletion<MathAnswer> = client.chat().completions()
.parse::<MathAnswer>(request).await?;
println!("{}", result.parsed.unwrap().final_answer);
// Responses API
let result = client.responses().parse::<MathAnswer>(request).await?;The SDK auto-generates a strict JSON schema from your Rust types, sends it as response_format (Chat) or text.format (Responses), and deserializes the response. The API guarantees the output matches your schema.
// With raw JSON schema
const { parsed } = await client.createChatParsed(request, "MathAnswer", jsonSchema);
// With Zod (optional: npm install zod-to-json-schema)
const { zodParse } = require("openai-oxide/zod");
const Answer = z.object({ steps: z.array(z.string()), final_answer: z.string() });
const { parsed } = await zodParse(client, request, Answer);from pydantic import BaseModel
class MathAnswer(BaseModel):
steps: list[str]
final_answer: str
result = await client.create_parsed("gpt-5.4-mini", "What is 2+2?", MathAnswer)
print(result.final_answer) # Typed Pydantic instance, not dictHigh-level streaming with typed events and automatic delta accumulation.
use openai_oxide::stream_helpers::ChatStreamEvent;
// Option 1: Just get the final result
let stream = client.chat().completions().create_stream_helper(request).await?;
let completion = stream.get_final_completion().await?;
// Option 2: React to typed events
let mut stream = client.chat().completions().create_stream_helper(request).await?;
while let Some(event) = stream.next().await {
match event? {
ChatStreamEvent::ContentDelta { delta, snapshot } => {
print!("{delta}"); // Print as it arrives
// snapshot = full text accumulated so far
}
ChatStreamEvent::ToolCallDone { name, arguments, .. } => {
// Arguments are complete — execute the tool
execute_tool(&name, &arguments).await;
}
ChatStreamEvent::ContentDone { content } => {
// Final text, fully assembled
}
_ => {}
}
}No manual chunk stitching. Tool call arguments are automatically assembled from index-based deltas.
Verify OpenAI webhook signatures (feature: webhooks).
use openai_oxide::resources::webhooks::Webhooks;
let wh = Webhooks::new("whsec_your_secret")?;
let event: MyEvent = wh.unwrap(payload, signature_header, timestamp_header)?;Built in days, not months, using Claude Code: pre-commit quality gates, OpenAPI spec as ground truth, official Python SDK as reference. Planning and code intelligence via solo-factory skills and solograph MCP server.
Full OpenAI API coverage from a single codebase — Rust core with native bindings for every major platform.
- Rust Core: Typed client covering Chat, Responses, Realtime, Assistants, and 20+ endpoints.
- WASM Support: Cloudflare Workers and browser execution (with limitations noted above).
- Python Bindings: Native PyO3 integration published on PyPI.
- Tauri Integrations: Dedicated examples/guides for building AI desktop apps with Tauri + WebSockets.
- HTMX + Axum Examples: Showcasing how to stream LLM responses directly to HTML with zero-JS frontends.
- Swift Bindings (UniFFI): Native iOS/macOS integration for Apple ecosystem developers.
- Kotlin Bindings (UniFFI): Native Android integration via JNI.
- Node.js/TypeScript Bindings (NAPI-RS): Native Node.js bindings for the TS ecosystem.
PRs welcome.
OpenAI changes their API often. We built an automated sync pipeline to keep up.
Types are strictly validated against the official OpenAPI spec and cross-checked directly with the official Python SDK's AST.
make sync # downloads latest spec, diffs against local schema, runs coveragemake sync automatically:
- Downloads the latest OpenAPI schema from OpenAI.
- Displays a precise
git diffof newly added endpoints, struct fields, and enums. - Runs the
openapi_coveragetest suite to statically verify our Rust types against the spec.
Coverage is enforced on every commit via pre-commit hooks (currently 96% — missing stream and partial_images on Images). Types are auto-synced from the Python SDK via py2rust.py, so new OpenAI fields land with a single make sync-types run.
openai-oxide is designed to be an agent infrastructure crate — the OpenAI layer that any Rust agent framework can build on. Not tied to a specific agent architecture.
- sgr-agent — LLM agent framework with structured output, function calling, and agent loops. Uses
openai-oxideas the OpenAI backend. The same crate compiles to WASM for browser-based agents. - rust-code — AI-powered TUI coding agent built on sgr-agent.
This repo includes an Agent Skill — a portable knowledge pack that teaches AI coding assistants how to use openai-oxide correctly (gotchas, patterns, API reference).
Works with Claude Code, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Gemini CLI, VS Code, and 30+ other agents.
# Context7
npx ctx7 skills search openai-oxide
npx ctx7 skills install /fortunto2/openai-oxide
# skills.sh
npx skills add fortunto2/openai-oxide- openai-python — Official Python SDK (our benchmark baseline)
- async-openai — Alternative Rust client (mature, 1800+ stars)
- genai — Multi-provider Rust client (Gemini, Anthropic, OpenAI)
