Skip to content

Invoking+Awaiting #1051

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
jnyrup merged 1 commit into from
May 27, 2019
Merged

Invoking+Awaiting #1051

jnyrup merged 1 commit into from
May 27, 2019

Conversation

@jnyrup
Copy link
Member

@jnyrup jnyrup commented May 26, 2019

This fixes #872 and complements #1015 by implementing

Func<TResult> Invoking<T, TResult>(this T subject, Func<T, TResult> action)

For consistency this also implements

Func<Task<TResult>> Awaiting<T, TResult>(this T subject, Func<T, Task<TResult>> action)

though this currently doesn't have much benefit as both Func<Task> and Func<Task<T>> uses AsyncFunctionAssertions.

@jnyrup jnyrup requested a review from dennisdoomen May 26, 2019 20:51
@jnyrup jnyrup merged commit 72469c5 into fluentassertions:master May 27, 2019
@jnyrup jnyrup deleted the Invoking branch May 27, 2019 06:11
@jnyrup jnyrup mentioned this pull request Oct 30, 2020
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@dennisdoomen dennisdoomen dennisdoomen approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Invoking should support Func<TInput, TResult>

2 participants

@jnyrup @dennisdoomen