Adjust how nested anonymous record naming conflicts are resolved#628
Merged
Conversation
tannergooding
force-pushed
the
fix-anonymous
branch
from
0be9be0 to
239fe98
Compare
tannergooding
force-pushed
the
fix-anonymous
branch
from
239fe98 to
9153e00
Compare
This was referenced Dec 22, 2025
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This fixes
RecordDeclto once again match the Clang C++ API surface and ensures we don't deviate from the previous naming strategy when no conflicts exist to avoid unnecessary churn.This was broken in #587