refactor unit tests on package lock #374
Conversation
a ping to localhost doesn't necessarily work on some firewalled computers
WalkthroughThe overall changes primarily involve minor version updates to code generation tools and significant refactoring of test functions for improved readability and structure. Specifically, the code generation tool Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (7)
- config/mocks/NamedPropertySet.go (1 hunks)
- config/mocks/ProfileInfo.go (1 hunks)
- config/mocks/PropertyInfo.go (1 hunks)
- config/mocks/SectionInfo.go (1 hunks)
- lock/lock_test.go (14 hunks)
- monitor/mocks/OutputAnalysis.go (1 hunks)
- schedule/mocks/Handler.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (6)
- config/mocks/NamedPropertySet.go
- config/mocks/ProfileInfo.go
- config/mocks/PropertyInfo.go
- config/mocks/SectionInfo.go
- monitor/mocks/OutputAnalysis.go
- schedule/mocks/Handler.go
Additional context used
golangci-lint
lock/lock_test.go
285-285: 285-309 lines are duplicate of
lock/lock_test.go:311-335(dupl)
311-311: 311-335 lines are duplicate of
lock/lock_test.go:285-309(dupl)
Additional comments not posted (6)
lock/lock_test.go (6)
34-39: Well-implemented helper function for temporary files.The
getTempfilefunction correctly utilisest.TempDir()and logs the temporary file used, which enhances test traceability.
42-45: Refactoring to use helper functiongetTempfileis correctly implemented.Using
getTempfileensures consistency in how temporary files are handled across tests.
74-76: Good use ofgetTempfileand correct error handling testing.The test correctly handles scenarios where no PID is set, which is crucial for robustness.
90-92: Correct implementation of PID setting in tests.The test ensures that the PID is set correctly and verifies it, which is essential for ensuring the lock's functionality.
107-109: Proper handling of multiple PID settings in tests.This test effectively checks the behaviour when multiple PIDs are set, which is crucial for complex scenarios.
126-127: Effective testing of process completion.The test correctly determines if a child process has finished, which is vital for process management.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- lock/lock_test.go (15 hunks)
Additional context used
golangci-lint
lock/lock_test.go
26-26: don't use
initfunction(gochecknoinits)
[medium] 320-320: G204: Subprocess launched with a potential tainted input or cmd arguments
(gosec)
Additional comments not posted (16)
lock/lock_test.go (16)
15-15: Review of imports and global variable declarationThe imports added are necessary for the new functionalities introduced in the test file. Changing
helperBinaryfrom a constant to a variable is appropriate given the platform-dependent modification in theinitfunction.Also applies to: 22-22
36-42: Review ofgetTempfilefunctionThe implementation of
getTempfileis clear and effective, providing a reusable way to generate temporary files for tests, which enhances test isolation and cleanliness.
44-53: Review ofTestLockIsAvailablefunctionThe test is well-structured, making good use of parallel execution and the
getTempfilehelper. It correctly tests the lock acquisition functionality.
Line range hint
55-71: Review ofTestLockIsNotAvailablefunctionThis test is correctly designed to check the lock's behaviour when it is already acquired. It effectively uses assertions to validate the lock status and the identity of the lock holder.
Tools
golangci-lint
26-26: don't use
initfunction(gochecknoinits)
Line range hint
76-88: Review ofTestNoPIDfunctionThe test effectively simulates and validates the scenario where no PID is associated with the lock. It uses the
getTempfilehelper for setup and correctly asserts the expected outcomes.
Line range hint
92-104: Review ofTestSetOnePIDfunctionThe test is well-structured, setting a PID and verifying it through subsequent calls. It makes effective use of the
getTempfilehelper and parallel execution.
Line range hint
109-123: Review ofTestSetMorePIDfunctionThis test correctly simulates setting multiple PIDs in sequence and validates that the last set PID is the one that is retrieved, demonstrating the lock's behaviour in handling multiple PIDs.
Line range hint
128-150: Review ofTestProcessFinishedfunctionThe test effectively uses a signalled command to simulate a process scenario. It sets a PID, runs the command, and correctly asserts whether the process still exists, providing a clear validation of the process's end state.
Line range hint
152-175: Review ofTestProcessNotFinishedfunctionThis test effectively simulates a scenario where a process is expected to be running. It uses the
helperBinaryto ensure the process runs for a sufficient duration and correctly asserts the process's state.
181-189: Review ofTestForceLockIsAvailablefunctionThis test is correctly structured to validate the functionality of forcefully acquiring a lock, using the
getTempfilehelper for setup and asserting the expected behaviour.
Line range hint
191-205: Review ofTestForceLockWithNoPIDfunctionThis test effectively simulates and validates the scenario where a force lock is attempted without any PID being set. It uses the
getTempfilehelper for setup and correctly asserts the expected outcomes.
Line range hint
207-229: Review ofTestForceLockWithExpiredPIDfunctionThis test effectively simulates and validates the scenario where a force lock is attempted with an expired PID. It uses the
getTempfilehelper for setup and correctly asserts the expected outcomes, including the manual closure of the lockfile handle.
Line range hint
237-265: Review ofTestForceLockWithRunningPIDfunctionThis test effectively simulates and validates the scenario where a force lock is attempted with a running PID. It uses the
helperBinaryto ensure the process runs for a sufficient duration and correctly asserts the lock's behaviour in this situation.
Line range hint
266-279: Review ofTestLockWithNoInterruptionfunctionThis test effectively simulates and validates the scenario where a lock is acquired and released without any interruptions. It uses the
helperBinaryto ensure the process runs smoothly and correctly asserts the expected outcomes.
Line range hint
285-305: Review ofTestLockIsRemovedAfterInterruptSignalfunctionThis test effectively simulates and validates the scenario where a lock is acquired and then removed after receiving an interrupt signal. It uses the
helperBinaryto ensure the process is interrupted correctly and asserts the expected outcomes.
Line range hint
311-333: Review ofTestLockIsRemovedAfterInterruptSignalInsideShellfunctionThis test effectively simulates and validates the scenario where a lock is acquired and then removed after receiving an interrupt signal inside a shell command. It uses the
helperBinaryto ensure the process is interrupted correctly and asserts the expected outcomes.Tools
golangci-lint
[medium] 320-320: G204: Subprocess launched with a potential tainted input or cmd arguments
(gosec)
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.