[SPARK-56123][PYTHON] Refactor SQL_GROUPED_AGG_ARROW_UDF and SQL_GROUPED_AGG_ARROW_ITER_UDF#54992
Draft
Yicong-Huang wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom
Draft
Conversation
Yicong-Huang
changed the title
Yicong-Huang
force-pushed
the
SPARK-56123/refactor/grouped-agg-arrow-udf
branch
4 times, most recently
from
e8a35a7 to
a15c5d1
Compare
Yicong-Huang
force-pushed
the
SPARK-56123/refactor/grouped-agg-arrow-udf
branch
from
a15c5d1 to
827d633
Compare
Contributor
Author
|
This PR depends on #54967 ( |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Refactor
SQL_GROUPED_AGG_ARROW_UDFandSQL_GROUPED_AGG_ARROW_ITER_UDFto useArrowStreamSerializeras a pure I/O layer, moving all processing logic intoread_udfs()inworker.py.Why are the changes needed?
Part of SPARK-55388. This makes the eval types self-contained in
read_udfs(), consistent with the previously refactoredSQL_SCALAR_ARROW_UDFandSQL_MAP_ARROW_ITER_UDF.Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.
ASV micro-benchmarks show 5-25% improvement for
SQL_GROUPED_AGG_ARROW_UDFand 0-14% forSQL_GROUPED_AGG_ARROW_ITER_UDF:Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?
No.