Skip to content

Fix deprecated error#5128

Merged
dgrove-oss merged 2 commits into
apache:masterfrom
jiangpengcheng:fix_deprecated_error
Jun 9, 2021
Merged

Fix deprecated error#5128
dgrove-oss merged 2 commits into
apache:masterfrom
jiangpengcheng:fix_deprecated_error

Conversation

@jiangpengcheng

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description

Fix deprecated error

Related issue and scope

  • I opened an issue to propose and discuss this change (#????)

My changes affect the following components

  • API
  • Controller
  • Message Bus (e.g., Kafka)
  • Loadbalancer
  • Scheduler
  • Invoker
  • Intrinsic actions (e.g., sequences, conductors)
  • Data stores (e.g., CouchDB)
  • Tests
  • Deployment
  • CLI
  • General tooling
  • Documentation

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (generally a non-breaking change which closes an issue).
  • Enhancement or new feature (adds new functionality).
  • Breaking change (a bug fix or enhancement which changes existing behavior).

Checklist:

  • I signed an Apache CLA.
  • I reviewed the style guides and followed the recommendations (Travis CI will check :).
  • I added tests to cover my changes.
  • My changes require further changes to the documentation.
  • I updated the documentation where necessary.

@codecov-commenter

codecov-commenter commented Jun 9, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 74.60%. Comparing base (ecb2a98) to head (6b1481f).
⚠️ Report is 200 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #5128       +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage   28.91%   74.60%   +45.68%     
===========================================
  Files         219      233       +14     
  Lines       11775    12661      +886     
  Branches      506      521       +15     
===========================================
+ Hits         3405     9446     +6041     
+ Misses       8370     3215     -5155     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

docReader: DocumentReader,
actorSystem: ActorSystem,
logging: Logging,
materializer: ActorMaterializer): ArtifactStore[D] = {

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So we don't need a materializer at all?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

seems yes

}

probe.expectMsg(Transition(machine, Paused, Running))
pool.expectMsgType[Resumed]

@ningyougang ningyougang Jun 9, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great idea for using separate probe object

@dgrove-oss dgrove-oss merged commit 20417de into apache:master Jun 9, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants