Skip to content

Restyle 🐳🔐🤖#5

Open
restyled-io[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intoadd-docker-lockfrom
restyled/add-docker-lock
Open

Restyle 🐳🔐🤖#5
restyled-io[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intoadd-docker-lockfrom
restyled/add-docker-lock

Conversation

@restyled-io
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@restyled-io restyled-io bot commented Aug 16, 2020

Automated style fixes for #4, created by Restyled.

The following restylers made fixes:

  • jq

To incorporate these changes, merge this Pull Request into the original. We
recommend using the Squash or Rebase strategies.

NOTE: As work continues on the original Pull Request, this process will
re-run and update (force-push) this Pull Request with updated style fixes as
necessary. If the style is fixed manually at any point (i.e. this process finds
no fixes to make), this Pull Request will be closed automatically.

Sorry if this was unexpected. To disable it, see our documentation.

GitHub
Restyled.io. Contribute to restyled-io/restyled.io development by creating an account on GitHub.

@performance-testing-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Unable to locate .performanceTestingBot config file

@commit-lint
Copy link
Copy Markdown

commit-lint bot commented Aug 16, 2020

Contributors

@restyled-commits

Commit-Lint commands

You can trigger Commit-Lint actions by commenting on this PR:

  • @Commit-Lint merge patch will merge dependabot PR on "patch" versions (X.X.Y - Y change)
  • @Commit-Lint merge minor will merge dependabot PR on "minor" versions (X.Y.Y - Y change)
  • @Commit-Lint merge major will merge dependabot PR on "major" versions (Y.Y.Y - Y change)
  • @Commit-Lint merge disable will desactivate merge dependabot PR
  • @Commit-Lint review will approve dependabot PR
  • @Commit-Lint stop review will stop approve dependabot PR

@scribe-connect
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Linked documents: 0
Files with no linked documents: 1
Recently updated documents: 0
Out of date documents: 0
Very out of date documents: 0

@trafico-bot trafico-bot bot added the 🔍 Ready for Review Pull Request is not reviewed yet label Aug 16, 2020
@pull-assistant
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Score: 1.00

Best reviewed: commit by commit


Optimal code review plan

     Restyled by jq

Powered by Pull Assistant. Last update 65f9fa3 ... 65f9fa3. Read the comment docs.

@starrycake starrycake bot requested a review from admdev8 August 16, 2020 03:30
@devreplay
Copy link
Copy Markdown

devreplay bot commented Aug 16, 2020

docker-lock.json : should be

 {
-  "dockerfiles": {},
-  "composefiles": {}
+  "dockerdiff": {},
+  "composediff": {}
 }

@devreplay
Copy link
Copy Markdown

devreplay bot commented Aug 16, 2020

docker-lock.json : should be

 {
-  "dockerfiles": {},
-  "composefiles": {}
+  "dockertitle,": {},
+  "composetitle,": {}
 }

@starrycake starrycake bot added the triage label Aug 16, 2020
@starrycake
Copy link
Copy Markdown

starrycake bot commented Aug 16, 2020

Thanks for opening this pull request!

@vizipi
Copy link
Copy Markdown

vizipi bot commented Aug 16, 2020

Pull request analysis by VIZIPI

Below you will find who is the most qualified team member to review your code.
This analysis includes his/her work on the code included in this Pull request, in addition to their experience in code affected by these changes ( partly found within the list of potential missing files below )   Feedback always welcome

Reviewers with knowledge related to these changes

Match % Person Commit Count Common Files
100.00 % Michael Perel 2 1

Potential missing files from this Pull request

No files found with a 40% threashold :)
No commonly committed files found with a 40% threashold


Committed file ranks

(click to expand)
  • 92.31%[docker-lock.json]
  • @restyled-io restyled-io bot force-pushed the restyled/add-docker-lock branch from 65f9fa3 to 87b2c66 Compare October 19, 2020 19:06
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

    Labels

    🔍 Ready for Review Pull Request is not reviewed yet size/XS triage

    Projects

    None yet

    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    2 participants