Message 91597 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	gregory.p.smith
Recipients	amaury.forgeotdarc, benjamin.peterson, gregory.p.smith, kristjan.jonsson, pitrou
Date	2009-08-15.06:46:12
SpamBayes Score	6.0675666e-06
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<[email protected]>
In-reply-to

Content
I believe there will be a problem with the patch committed in r68532. If getresponse(buffering=True) is called, extra data on the socket may be consumed by the socket.makefile() buffer which will cause problems if the connection is not closed immediately after this response. I mentioned this in comments on http://bugs.python.org/issue2576 which happens to have a way of fixing this already proposed as they are trying to solve an almost identical issue to this without yet having seen this issue.

I believe there will be a problem with the patch committed in r68532. 
If getresponse(buffering=True) is called, extra data on the socket may
be consumed by the socket.makefile() buffer which will cause problems if
the connection is not closed immediately after this response.

I mentioned this in comments on http://bugs.python.org/issue2576 which
happens to have a way of fixing this already proposed as they are trying
to solve an almost identical issue to this without yet having seen this
issue.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2009-08-15 06:46:15	gregory.p.smith	set	recipients: + gregory.p.smith, amaury.forgeotdarc, pitrou, kristjan.jonsson, benjamin.peterson
2009-08-15 06:46:14	gregory.p.smith	set	messageid: <[email protected]>
2009-08-15 06:46:12	gregory.p.smith	link	issue4879 messages
2009-08-15 06:46:12	gregory.p.smith	create