Message 62852 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	belopolsky
Recipients	belopolsky, benjamin.peterson, georg.brandl, loewis, vdupras
Date	2008-02-24.00:19:00
SpamBayes Score	0.11630788
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<[email protected]>
In-reply-to

Content
> dict doesn't dynamically bind any calls; to > properly replace the semantics of dict, you > have to implement all API. What was the rationale for this decision? To me it looks like a hold- over from the time when dicts were not subclassable. I agree, this is a topic for python-ideas rather than bug-track, but if you could point me to any prior discussions on this issue, it would help me to either formulate a specific proposal or drop the issue before more electrons are sacrificed.

> dict doesn't dynamically bind any calls; to
> properly replace the semantics of dict, you
> have to implement *all* API.

What was the rationale for this decision?  To me it looks like a hold-
over from the time when dicts were not subclassable.

I agree, this is a topic for python-ideas rather than bug-track, but if 
you could point me to any prior discussions on this issue, it would help 
me to either formulate a specific proposal or drop the issue before more 
electrons are sacrificed.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2008-02-24 00:19:01	belopolsky	set	spambayes_score: 0.116308 -> 0.11630788 recipients: + belopolsky, loewis, georg.brandl, benjamin.peterson, vdupras
2008-02-24 00:19:01	belopolsky	set	spambayes_score: 0.116308 -> 0.116308 messageid: <[email protected]>
2008-02-24 00:19:00	belopolsky	link	issue2144 messages
2008-02-24 00:19:00	belopolsky	create