➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author serhiy.storchaka
Recipients George K, docs@python, mark.dickinson, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, steve.dower
Date 2017-07-16.17:16:36
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <[email protected]>
In-reply-to
Content 
In 3.4 round() doesn't accept None as ndigits argument. The behavior was changed by issue19933 and issue27936. Wasn't this change a mistake? Seems Mark opposed to it.
History
Date User Action Args
2017-07-16 17:16:36serhiy.storchakasetrecipients: + serhiy.storchaka, rhettinger, mark.dickinson, docs@python, steve.dower, George K
2017-07-16 17:16:36serhiy.storchakasetmessageid: <[email protected]>
2017-07-16 17:16:36serhiy.storchakalinkissue30940 messages
2017-07-16 17:16:36serhiy.storchakacreate